Article 355 imposes a duty on the centre to ensure that the government of every state is carried out in accordance with the provisions of the constitution. It is to fulfil this duty that centre takes over the administration of a state under article 356 in case of failure of constitutional machinery in state
Grounds of imposition
|
The president’s ruler can be proclaimed under Article 356 on two grounds:
|
Parliamentary approval and duration
|
· A proclamation imposing president’s rule must be approved by both the houses of parliament within two months from the date of its issue. · However, if the proclamation of President’s rule is issued at a time when the Lok Sabha has been dissolved or the dissolution of the Lok Sabha takes place during the period of two months without approving the proclamation, then the proclamation survives until 30 days from the first sitting of the Lok Sabha after its reconstitution, provided that the Rajya Sabha approves it in the meantime. |
Scope of judicial review
|
The 38th Amendment act of 1975 made the satisfaction of the President in invoking Article 356 final and conclusive which would not be challenged in any court on any ground. But this provision was subsequently deleted by the 44th Amendment Act of 1978 implying that the satisfaction of the President is not beyond judicial review.
|
R. Bommai v. Union of India
R. Bommai v. Union of India is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, where the Court discussed at length provisions of Article 356 of the Constitution of India and related issues. This case had huge impact on Centre-State Relations.