UPSC Mains 2026 GS Paper 3: Complete Question-wise Synopsis for All 20 Questions

The UPSC Civil Services Main Examination 2026 General Studies Paper 3 tested candidates through questions on the economy, agriculture, science and technology, environment, disaster management and internal security. This page brings together the complete question-wise synopsis for all 20 questions in one place for focused revision and answer-writing practice.

The synopsis below follows the structure of the supplied GS Paper 3 material. The full UPSC question is used as the heading for every answer so that the directive, scope and multiple demands of each question remain visible while revising the suggested approach.

Paper
General Studies Paper 3
Questions
20 Compulsory Questions
Maximum Marks
250 Marks
Format
10M + 15M Questions
Contents: All 20 Questions
  1. 1. What do you mean by Digital Rupee? In this context, explain the working and progress of India’s Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).
  2. 2. Examine the view that financial inclusion is an integral part of social and economic inclusion in a country like India. Also throw light on the usefulness of the R.B.I.’s Financial Inclusion Index.
  3. 3. Describe the various Technology Missions initiated in Indian agriculture and examine their role in food security.
  4. 4. Explain the factors responsible for inefficiency of agri-produce marketing. How e-commerce helps to reduce inefficiency of agri-produce marketing? Explain.
  5. 5. Explain by giving two examples, how biotechnology has helped the Indian farmers in processing their perishable crops.
  6. 6. Distinguish between a Fast Breeder Reactor (FBR) and a thermal nuclear reactor. In the context of first indigenously developed prototype FBR at Kalpakkam, explain the term ‘criticality’. What are its implications for clean energy future of our country?
  7. 7. Discuss how the contradiction between ‘rapid infrastructure development’ and ‘disaster-risk reduction’ in ecologically-sensitive areas of India can be managed, with suitable examples.
  8. 8. Discuss the aim and goals of Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity framework. Mention India’s commitments and initiatives to achieve the goals and targets of this framework giving suitable examples.
  9. 9. Explain how fake news and disinformation pose threat to Internal Security and Public Order in Indian context? In this regard, discuss salient features of amendments in respect of Information Technology (Intermediatory Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021.
  10. 10. Ladakh is strategically located between China and Pakistan. As a measure to win hearts and minds of locals, discuss the Border Area Development Programmes (BADP) by the Central Government and civic actions by the Army. Also discuss demand of promulgation of provision of the Sixth Schedule of constitution for Ladakh.
  11. 11. Explain the key challenges for India’s energy security. What measures do you suggest for ensuring energy security along with economic growth and sustainability?
  12. 12. How are startups in India promoting entrepreneurship, innovation and employment? Discuss the global and domestic challenges in their working and suggest suitable measures to overcome these challenges.
  13. 13. How Indian agriculture has been transformed from food scarcity to food surplus level? Explain the various government policies implemented for diversification of Indian agriculture.
  14. 14. Discuss the different types of subsidies and supports provided by the Government of India to agricultural sector. Examine the related issues pertaining to Agreement on Agriculture of World Trade Organisation (WTO).
  15. 15. Mention salient features of ‘Mission Drishti’. Discuss the imaging techniques used in the satellite launched on 3rd May 2026. Why it is being considered world’s first satellite of its kind?
  16. 16. What is agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Explain its working. Describe its applications with suitable examples. Discuss the advantages, risks and challenges associated with agentic AI systems.
  17. 17. What are the challenges to solid waste management in India? Discuss the governmental policy framework on solid waste management. Discuss the success/failure cases of Delhi and Indore cities highlighting the salient feature of their solid waste management initiatives.
  18. 18. “Community participation is the cornerstone of effective disaster management”. Analyse this statement with suitable examples from India. Also discuss the challenges to community participation and measures to strengthen it.
  19. 19. Separatist movements have been one of the major factors contributing to militancy and instability in Jammu & Kashmir (J & K). Bring out actions taken by the Government to bring J & K into national mainstream. Discuss pre and post abrogation status of Articles 370 and 35A. Also bring out positive impacts of abrogation of both articles in mainstreaming the state.
  20. 20. Discuss counterfeit currency and money laundering as major sources of terror funding in India. State the actions being taken at International level to check these menaces. Highlight the role of Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and methods of compliance by its member states in preventing terror funding.

Q1. What do you mean by Digital Rupee? In this context, explain the working and progress of India’s Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).

10 Marks
Introduction

The Digital Rupee (e₹) seeks to combine the sovereign trust and settlement finality of currency with the efficiency of digital technology. Described by the RBI as “cash, but digital,” it complements rather than replaces cash and existing payment systems.

Body

About Digital Rupee

1.

Sovereign digital currency: The e₹ is India’s Central Bank Digital Currency, issued by the RBI in digital form, exchangeable at par with physical currency and recorded as its direct liability.

Eg: Unlike privately issued cryptocurrencies, e₹ has a stable face value, sovereign guarantee and legal-tender status. (RBI)
2.

Digital cash, not a payment rail: It functions as a means of payment and store of value, carries finality of settlement and earns no interest, similar to physical cash.

Eg: UPI transfers commercial-bank deposits, whereas e₹ itself constitutes sovereign money that can be separately stored in a digital wallet.

Working of India’s CBDC

Working of Digital Rupee CBDC

Fig: Working of Digital Rupee (CBDC)
1.

Two-tier issuance model: The RBI creates retail e₹ and issues it electronically to participating banks and non-banks, which onboard users and provide e₹ wallets.

Eg: Users can load or redeem e₹ between their linked bank account and wallet 24×7, without maintaining any minimum wallet balance.
2.

Wallet-based retail payments: Retail e₹ facilitates person-to-person and person-to-merchant transactions through mobile wallets using CBDC QR or interoperable UPI QR codes.

Eg: A transfer between two e₹ wallets is settled instantly without passing through the users’ bank accounts, resembling an exchange of physical cash.
3.

Wholesale settlement: The e₹-W enables financial institutions to settle eligible transactions in central-bank money, reducing settlement time, counterparty exposure and collateral requirements.

Eg: RBI pilots use e₹-W for settlement of secondary-market government securities and inter-bank call-money transactions.
4.

Programmable and offline features: Programmability permits funds to be restricted by purpose, location, merchant category or validity period, while offline e₹ enables use with limited connectivity.

Eg: A government or corporate sponsor can programme benefits for designated expenditure, while offline pilots support payments in poorly connected areas.

Progress of India’s CBDC

1.

Phased pilot launch: RBI launched the wholesale pilot on 1 November 2022 and the retail pilot on 1 December 2022, following a controlled test-and-learn approach.

Eg: These pilots assess technology, scalability, cyber-resilience, user acceptance and operational architecture before wider deployment.
2.

Expansion of participation: The retail pilot has expanded geographically and institutionally beyond its initial closed user group, with more banks, users and merchants participating.

Eg: By June 2024, the pilot had about 50 lakh users and 4.2 lakh merchants, RBI subsequently reported around 60 lakh users. (RBI)
3.

UPI interoperability: Existing UPI acceptance infrastructure has been leveraged by enabling users to scan UPI QR codes through e₹ applications.

Eg: Merchants need not maintain a separate CBDC-only QR network, thereby reducing adoption costs and improving the utility of e₹ wallets.
4.

Evolving use cases: During 2025–26, user-level programmability was introduced and RBI continued exploring offline, targeted-transfer and domestic retail applications.

Eg: RBI plans to extend pilots to direct-benefit-transfer schemes, alongside further retail and potential cross-border use cases. (RBI Annual Report 2025–26)
Conclusion

India’s calibrated pilot-first approach can develop e₹ into an inclusive, resilient and programmable form of sovereign money. Its wider adoption will depend on privacy protection, cyber-security, offline accessibility and a clear value proposition beyond UPI.

Q2. Examine the view that financial inclusion is an integral part of social and economic inclusion in a country like India. Also throw light on the usefulness of the R.B.I.’s Financial Inclusion Index.

10 Marks
Introduction

Financial inclusion is a means of expanding capabilities rather than merely opening bank accounts—it enables households to save, borrow, insure themselves and participate in markets on fairer terms. India’s JAM architecture, DBT and digital public infrastructure have increasingly linked financial access with wider social and economic empowerment.

Body

Financial inclusion as an integral part of social and economic inclusion

1.

Breaking the poverty-credit trap: Affordable institutional credit reduces dependence on exploitative informal lending and enables poorer households to invest in productive assets and livelihoods.

Eg: SHG-Bank Linkage Programme and Kisan Credit Cards connect vulnerable households and farmers with formal credit channels instead of relying solely on moneylenders.
2.

Effective welfare delivery: Financial inclusion connects citizens directly with the State, facilitating transparent and timely delivery of subsidies, pensions and other welfare benefits.

Eg: JAM-enabled Direct Benefit Transfer transfers benefits into beneficiaries’ bank accounts, thereby strengthening last-mile delivery and reducing dependence on intermediaries.
3.

Women’s economic empowerment: Independent access to banking increases women’s control over savings and welfare receipts, thereby strengthening their financial autonomy and household bargaining power.

Eg: As on 12 August 2026, 32.89 crore of 59.04 crore PMJDY beneficiaries were women, indicating the gender-inclusive reach of formal banking.
4.

Social security and resilience: Access to savings, insurance and pensions enables vulnerable households to withstand health, accident, livelihood and old-age shocks without distress borrowing.

Eg: Bank-account penetration facilitates participation in PMJJBY, PMSBY and Atal Pension Yojana, extending formal risk-protection mechanisms to underserved households.
5.

Formalisation and economic participation: Banking access and digital payments create financial footprints for small producers and workers, enabling their progressive integration with formal markets and credit systems.

Eg: AePS, UPI and Business Correspondents have reduced geographical and transaction barriers, particularly where conventional bank-branch access is difficult.

RBI Financial Inclusion Index

Fig: RBI Financial Inclusion Index

Usefulness of the RBI’s Financial Inclusion Index

1.

Multidimensional measurement: The FI-Index, introduced by RBI in 2021, captures inclusion through Access (35%), Usage (45%) and Quality (20%), rather than merely counting accounts.

Eg: Its 97 indicators cover availability, ease of access, usage, financial literacy, efficiency and consumer protection.
2.

Measures depth of inclusion: The higher 45% weight to Usage helps distinguish meaningful participation in financial services from mere availability or nominal account ownership.

Eg: The index covers banking, investment, insurance, pension and postal sectors, providing a broader assessment of citizens’ engagement with formal finance.
3.

Tracks quality of services: Inclusion is assessed not only through availability but also through dimensions such as financial literacy and consumer protection, making the measurement more citizen-centric.

Eg: RBI incorporates quality-related indicators alongside access and usage, helping capture deficiencies that simple branch or account statistics cannot reveal.
4.

Tracks progress over time: A standardised 0–100 index enables policymakers to assess whether financial inclusion is progressively deepening and which dimensions require greater attention.

Eg: The FI-Index increased from 43.4 in March 2017 to 64.2 in March 2024, with improvement across all three sub-indices.
5.

Supports evidence-based policy: Disaggregating inclusion into access, usage and quality helps policymakers identify the nature of exclusion and design more targeted interventions.

Eg: RBI reported that the March 2024 improvement was mainly contributed by FI-Usage, indicating the importance of moving beyond simple expansion of access.

Challenges and limitations of the FI-Index

1.

National aggregation masks disparities: A single all-India score can conceal substantial differences in financial inclusion across regions, gender, income groups and rural-urban populations.

Eg: PMJDY data itself shows large state-wise variations in beneficiaries and deposits, which an aggregate national FI score cannot independently display.
2.

Measurement cannot fully capture outcomes: Higher access or usage does not necessarily establish that finance has improved household income, reduced indebtedness or created productive assets.

Eg: An individual may actively use a bank account for DBT or payments while still lacking adequate formal productive credit, insurance or long-term financial security.
3.

Composite score may obscure specific weaknesses: Combining 97 indicators into one index improves comprehensiveness but can make the headline number less intuitive and hide weaknesses within individual indicators.

Eg: Improvement in digital-payment usage may raise overall inclusion even while challenges relating to financial literacy, consumer protection or credit access persist.
Conclusion

India must progress from financial access to financial well-being, where formal finance creates genuine economic opportunity and resilience. Complementing the FI-Index with granular regional and outcome indicators can make financial inclusion a stronger pathway to inclusive growth.

Q3. Describe the various Technology Missions initiated in Indian agriculture and examine their role in food security.

10 Marks
Introduction

Technology Missions introduced a mission-mode, end-to-end approach combining research, quality inputs, extension, processing and marketing. They widened Indian agriculture’s focus from cereal sufficiency to nutrition, edible-oil security, diversification and resilient livelihoods.

Body

Major technology missions in Indian agriculture

1.

Technology mission on oilseeds: Established in 1986, it coordinated technology generation, input delivery, price support, processing and marketing to accelerate the Yellow Revolution.

Eg: Pulses were included in 1990, the approach later covered oil palm and maize through integrated development programmes.
2.

Technology mission on cotton: Launched on 21 February 2000, its four mini-missions covered research, technology transfer, market infrastructure and modernisation of ginning and pressing.

Eg: It promoted high-yielding varieties, integrated pest management and cleaner processing, improving cotton availability and quality.
3.

Technology mission on horticulture: Started in 2001–02 for the North-East and extended in 2003–04 to three Himalayan states, it covered the entire chain from planting to marketing.

Eg: Renamed HMNEH, it was subsumed under Mission for Integrated Development of Horticulture from 2014–15.
4.

Technology mission on coconut: Launched in 2001–02, it promoted technology development, demonstrations, processing, product diversification and market development in the coconut sector.

Eg: Support for value-added products such as virgin coconut oil and coconut-based foods strengthened plantation livelihoods and edible-oil availability.
5.

National mission on bamboo technology and trade development: Initiated during the Tenth Plan, it promoted bamboo cultivation, processing technologies, product development and market linkages.

Eg: Its approach continues through the restructured National Bamboo Mission, connecting farm-grown bamboo with processing units and rural enterprises.
6.

Jute technology mission: Approved in 2006 and launched in 2006–07, its four mini-missions covered seed research, agronomy, retting, processing, diversification and marketing.

Eg: Improved retting and diversified jute products supported farm families while providing sustainable material for foodgrain packaging and storage.
7.

Contemporary mission continuum: NMEO–Oil Palm (2021), NMEO–Oilseeds (2024) and the Digital Agriculture Mission (2024) extend mission-mode intervention to current technological gaps.

Eg: NMEO–Oilseeds promotes high-oil varieties, genome editing, rice-fallow cultivation and value-chain clusters to reduce import dependence.

Role in food security

1.

Greater food availability: Better seeds, demonstrations and extension raised the production and productivity of oilseeds, pulses, maize, coconut and horticultural crops.

Eg: The oilseeds mission produced the Yellow Revolution, demonstrating the gains possible through coordinated technology and price policy.
2.

Nutritional diversification: Pulses, edible oils, fruits, vegetables and coconut supplement cereal-based diets with proteins, fats, vitamins and micronutrients.

Eg: Horticulture missions expanded access to protective foods, advancing the shift from calorie security towards nutritional security.
3.

Reduced external vulnerability: Domestic production of pulses and edible oils cushions consumers against global supply disruptions, price spikes and foreign-exchange pressures.

Eg: NMEO–Oilseeds and NMEO–Oil Palm target higher domestic edible-oil availability through productivity and area expansion.
4.

Improved stability of supplies: Processing, storage, grading, pest management and value-chain infrastructure reduce post-harvest losses and seasonal fluctuations.

Eg: Horticultural cold-chain support and improved jute packaging help preserve perishables and protect stored foodgrains.
5.

Enhanced economic access: Higher productivity and value addition increase farm incomes, enabling rural households to purchase adequate and diverse food.

Eg: Coconut processing, bamboo enterprises and horticultural clusters generate income beyond seasonal cereal cultivation.
6.

Mixed outcomes: Uneven extension, regional concentration, climatic risks and weak processing have prevented mission technologies from achieving universal gains.

Eg: Continued edible-oil import dependence shows the need to bridge yield gaps without encouraging ecologically unsuitable crop expansion.
Conclusion

The next generation of missions must integrate climate-resilient seeds, digital advisories, local processing and assured markets. Their ultimate test should be affordable, nutritious and stable food—not production growth alone.

Q4. Explain the factors responsible for inefficiency of agri-produce marketing. How e-commerce helps to reduce inefficiency of agri-produce marketing? Explain.

10 Marks
Introduction

Efficient marketing should transmit consumer demand and prices fairly to cultivators, yet India’s farm-to-fork chain remains costly and fragmented. RBI studies estimate farmers’ share in the consumer rupee at only 33% for tomato, 36% for onion and 37% for potato, revealing substantial marketing inefficiencies.

Body

Factors responsible for inefficiency of agri-produce marketing

1.

Fragmented regulatory markets: Differences in State APMC laws, mandi jurisdictions, licences and market charges constrain inter-market competition and obstruct a unified national market.

Eg: A trader operating across different States or market areas may require multiple licences, restricting farmers largely to buyers in the local APMC mandi.
2.

Excessive intermediation: Multiple commission agents, wholesalers and retailers raise marketing margins while reducing the producer’s share in the final consumer price.

Eg: RBI studies estimate farmers’ share at merely 31% for banana, 35% for grapes and 43% for mangoes in domestic value chains. (RBI Working Papers)
3.

Small surplus and weak bargaining power: Fragmented holdings produce small, scattered lots that are costly to transport and leave individual farmers unable to negotiate with large buyers.

Eg: A marginal vegetable grower generally sells to a village aggregator instead of independently supplying a processor, retailer or distant wholesale market.
4.

Information and credit asymmetry: Limited access to real-time prices and dependence on traders for informal credit lead farmers to accept unfavourable prices and tied sales.

Eg: During a post-harvest glut, a farmer needing immediate cash may sell to the financing trader without comparing prices in nearby mandis.
5.

Deficient post-harvest infrastructure: Inadequate assaying, grading, warehouses, cold chains, pack-houses and processing facilities cause deterioration and force immediate sale of perishables.

Eg: Poor refrigerated transport and storage intensify distress sale and price volatility in tomato, onion, potato, fruits and fish.
6.

Opaque price discovery: Manual auctions, subjective visual inspection and possible trader collusion prevent prices from accurately reflecting quality and wider demand conditions.

Eg: Without standardised assaying, a high-quality grain lot may be mixed with ordinary produce and denied the quality-linked premium it deserves.

e-commerce reduces marketing inefficiency

1.

Transparent price discovery: Online bidding exposes produce to more buyers, displays competing bids and reduces the information advantage enjoyed by local intermediaries.

Eg: By March 2026, e-NAM connected 1,656 mandis, over 1.80 crore farmers and 2.73 lakh traders across 23 States and four UTs. (Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare)
2.

Wider market access: Digital platforms connect farmers and FPOs with traders, processors, retailers and consumers beyond local mandi boundaries, increasing effective competition.

Eg: e-NAM facilitated cumulative trade of 13.25 crore tonnes worth about ₹4.84 lakh crore between 2016 and March 2026.
3.

Shorter supply chains: Business-to-business and business-to-consumer e-commerce permits FPOs to list produce and interact directly with institutional buyers and consumers.

Eg: Over 9,000 FPOs were onboarded on ONDC by June 2025, enabling digital sale of farm products across wider geographies.
4.

Aggregation and farm-gate trading: FPO and farm-gate modules combine small lots, strengthen bargaining power and allow bidding without first transporting produce to the mandi.

Eg: By March 2026, 4,724 FPOs were onboarded on e-NAM and could offer aggregated produce through their collection centres.
5.

Quality-based transactions: Electronic assaying certificates and standard commodity parameters enable remote buyers to trust quality and offer differentiated prices accordingly.

Eg: AI and machine-learning-based assaying machines were being used in 134 e-NAM mandis of Rajasthan by February 2026.
6.

Integrated storage and settlement: Linkage with e-NWRs, logistics providers and digital payments reduces physical movement, settlement delays, spoilage and distress sales.

Eg: Farmers can store produce in a WDRA-accredited warehouse, trade its e-NWR on e-NAM and receive sale proceeds directly into their bank accounts.
Conclusion

E-commerce can transform agricultural marketing from a locality-bound transaction into a transparent, quality-sensitive and nationally connected value chain. Its gains must be reinforced through harmonised market regulations, reliable assaying, digital literacy and last-mile logistics.

Q5. Explain by giving two examples, how biotechnology has helped the Indian farmers in processing their perishable crops.

10 Marks
Introduction

Perishable crops rapidly lose quality through respiration, enzymatic softening and microbial spoilage, often compelling farmers to accept distress prices. Biotechnology expands their economic life by enabling efficient processing, biological preservation and conversion into higher-value products.

Body

Food Biotechnology

Fig: Food Biotechnology

Biotechnology in food processing

1.

Enzyme-assisted extraction: Microbial enzymes break down plant tissues, increasing juice or pulp recovery while reducing processing time, energy use and raw-material wastage.

Eg: Pectinases and cellulases improve juice recovery from apples, grapes and citrus fruits by degrading pectin and cellulose in their cell walls.
2.

Quality enhancement: Specialised enzymes remove haze, bitterness and anti-nutritional substances, thereby improving the flavour, texture, clarity and acceptability of processed food.

Eg: Lactase produces lactose-free milk, while proteases and amylases improve the texture and consistency of several fermented and bakery products.
3.

Controlled fermentation: Selected microbial cultures convert sugars and other substrates into products with longer shelf life, distinct flavour and greater commercial value.

Eg: Lactic-acid bacteria convert vegetables into fermented foods, with the resulting acidity naturally limiting the growth of spoilage organisms.
4.

Biopreservation: Beneficial microorganisms and their metabolites inhibit pathogens and spoilage microbes, reducing excessive dependence on synthetic chemical preservatives.

Eg: Microbial products such as nisin, natamycin and organic acids are used to improve the safety and storage stability of processed foods.
5.

Bio-based coatings: Biopolymers and antimicrobial compounds form semi-permeable coatings that limit moisture loss, respiration and surface microbial contamination.

Eg: Chitosan and alginate-based edible coatings can delay quality deterioration in fresh-cut fruits and vegetables during storage and transportation.
6.

Waste valorisation: Microbial and enzymatic conversion transforms peels, pomace, seeds and rejected produce into useful products, supporting circular utilisation of biomass.

Eg: Fruit-processing residues can yield pectin, enzymes, organic acids, animal feed and bioethanol, generating value from material otherwise discarded.

Two specific examples of benefits to Indian farmers

1.
Enzyme-assisted processing of kinnow
1.

Processing constraint: Kinnow is seasonal and highly perishable, its juice contains pectin and bitter compounds that obstruct clarification and reduce consumer acceptability.

Eg: Seasonal concentration of arrivals exposes kinnow growers in Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan to low prices and rejection of blemished fruits.
2.

Biotechnological intervention: Microbial pectinases and cellulases improve juice extraction and clarification, while naringinase reduces bitterness associated with naringin.

Eg: The treated juice becomes better suited for conversion into clarified juice, concentrate and blended beverages with greater marketability.
3.

Benefit to farmers: Processing absorbs surplus and non-premium-grade fruits, creates demand beyond the fresh market and facilitates productive utilisation of residues.

Eg: ICAR-CIPHET has also worked on microbial conversion of kinnow waste into cellulase and ethanol, improving total value recovered from the crop.
2.
Microbial processing of cashew apple
1.

Processing constraint: The cashew apple is sugar-rich but highly perishable and astringent, and is frequently underutilised after the commercially valuable nut is removed.

Eg: In Goa and other western-coastal States, large quantities must be consumed or processed soon after collection to avoid deterioration.
2.

Biotechnological intervention: Saccharomyces cerevisiae ferments cashew-apple sugars into alcohol, which acetic-acid bacteria can subsequently convert into vinegar.

Eg: Controlled fermentation produces comparatively stable products such as cashew-apple wine, vinegar and fermented beverages.
3.

Benefit to farmers: It creates a second revenue stream from the same harvest, supports decentralised processing enterprises and reduces disposal of organic biomass.

Eg: Cashew cultivators can derive income from both the nut and the apple, improving value realisation without expanding the cultivated area.
Conclusion

Biotechnology turns perishability from a source of distress sale into an avenue for product diversification and rural value addition. FPO-linked bioprocessing units, food-safety compliance and assured markets can take these gains from laboratories to farm clusters.

Q6. Distinguish between a Fast Breeder Reactor (FBR) and a thermal nuclear reactor. In the context of first indigenously developed prototype FBR at Kalpakkam, explain the term ‘criticality’. What are its implications for clean energy future of our country?

10 Marks
Introduction

India’s three-stage nuclear programme, conceived under Homi J. Bhabha, seeks to overcome limited domestic uranium availability and ultimately harness India’s large thorium resources. The indigenous 500 MWe Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) at Kalpakkam is the crucial bridge to the programme’s second stage.

Body

Fast Breeder Reactor

Fig: Fast Breeder Reactor

Difference between a fast breeder reactor and a thermal nuclear reactor

Basis Fast breeder reactor Thermal nuclear reactor
1. Neutron energy Uses fast neutrons to sustain the fission chain reaction.
Eg: The Kalpakkam PFBR operates with a fast-neutron spectrum.
Uses thermal or slowed-down neutrons for sustaining fission.
Eg: India’s Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs) are thermal-neutron reactors.
2. Fuel breeding Designed to breed more fissile material than it consumes by converting fertile material into fissile fuel.
Eg: PFBR’s U-238 blanket breeds fissile Pu-239 through neutron capture.
Primarily designed to generate energy by consuming fissile fuel rather than achieve a breeding ratio above one.
Eg: Indian PHWRs use natural uranium fuel, with U-235 principally sustaining the chain reaction.
3. Moderator No moderator is used, because maintaining the high energy of fast neutrons is essential.
Eg: The PFBR has no neutron moderator for slowing down its fast neutrons.
A moderator slows down neutrons to thermal energies, increasing the probability of fission in suitable fuels.
Eg: Indian PHWRs use heavy water (D₂O) as moderator.
4. Coolant India’s FBR uses liquid sodium coolant, which transfers heat efficiently without substantially slowing neutrons.
Eg: PFBR employs two sodium coolant circuits before transferring heat to the steam-water system.
Coolant depends on reactor design, Indian PHWRs use pressurised heavy water for heat removal.
Eg: 700 MWe indigenous PHWRs, such as Kakrapar units, use heavy water coolant.
5. Fuel utilisation Breeding and recycling permit greater utilisation of fertile U-238, supporting India’s closed nuclear fuel-cycle strategy.
Eg: Reprocessed plutonium from spent PHWR fuel provides the fissile input for the second-stage FBR programme.
Only a fraction of the potential energy in natural uranium is extracted during one passage through a thermal reactor.
Eg: Spent PHWR fuel is reprocessed in India to recover plutonium for subsequent stages of the nuclear programme.

Criticality in the context of PFBR

1.

Self-sustaining chain reaction: Criticality is the state where a controlled fission chain reaction becomes self-sustaining, with neutron production balancing neutron losses through absorption and leakage.

Eg: The 500 MWe PFBR achieved first criticality on 6 April 2026 at 8:25 PM, marking successful establishment of a self-sustaining chain reaction.
2.

Commissioning milestone: First criticality validates the reactor’s core behaviour and is a crucial commissioning step before systematic power escalation and eventual commercial electricity generation.

Eg: After criticality, PFBR proceeds through low-power physics experiments and phased power raising under prescribed regulatory clearances.

Implications for India’s clean-energy future

1.

Second-stage breakthrough: PFBR establishes the technological foundation for expanding Stage II of India’s three-stage nuclear programme through fast breeder reactors.

Eg: DAE identifies the 500 MWe PFBR as the forerunner of Stage II, paving the way for future commercial breeder reactors.
2.

Greater fuel security: Conversion of abundant fertile U-238 into fissile Pu-239 enables significantly better utilisation of uranium resources and reduces long-term fuel constraints.

Eg: PFBR is designed to produce more fissile material than it consumes, allowing bred plutonium eventually to fuel additional breeder capacity.
3.

Gateway to thorium: A mature breeder programme helps build the fissile inventory needed for eventual transition towards thorium utilisation in Stage III of India’s nuclear programme.

Eg: India ultimately envisages using Th-232 to breed fissile U-233, leveraging its substantial domestic thorium resource base.
4.

Reliable low-carbon power: Nuclear power provides firm, low-carbon electricity, complementing variable solar and wind generation while limiting additional dependence on fossil-fuel generation.

Eg: The Nuclear Energy Mission announced in Union Budget 2025-26 envisages at least 100 GW of nuclear-energy capacity by 2047, supporting India’s net-zero 2070 goal.
5.

Strategic technological self-reliance: Successful PFBR development demonstrates indigenous capability in complex reactor physics, sodium technology, fuel-cycle engineering and advanced nuclear manufacturing.

Eg: The PFBR was designed and developed by IGCAR, with BHAVINI responsible for its construction and commissioning at Kalpakkam.
Conclusion

The PFBR can transform India’s nuclear programme from limited fuel utilisation towards fuel multiplication and eventual thorium exploitation. Its safe and economical scaling can make advanced nuclear power a vital pillar of energy security and long-term decarbonisation.

Q7. Discuss how the contradiction between ‘rapid infrastructure development’ and ‘disaster-risk reduction’ in ecologically-sensitive areas of India can be managed, with suitable examples.

10 Marks
Introduction

Disaster risk arises when infrastructure increases exposure and vulnerability to an existing hazard. In India’s Himalayas, Western Ghats, coasts and islands, development must therefore be risk-informed, not merely rapid.

Body

Infrastructure development–disaster risk contradiction

1.

Slope cutting and landslides: Roads, tunnels and buildings constructed without slope-sensitive designs disturb geology, remove vegetation and obstruct natural drainage.

Eg: The Joshimath land-subsidence crisis, 2023 exposed the risks of dense construction, inadequate drainage and cumulative developmental pressure on fragile slopes.
2.

Hydropower and cascading disasters: Dams provide electricity but can multiply downstream losses if GLOFs, sediment loads and extreme floods exceed design assumptions.

Eg: The South Lhonak GLOF, 2023 caused the failure of Teesta-III dam and damaged bridges, NH-10 and settlements downstream.
3.

Tourism infrastructure and higher exposure: Hotels, parking facilities and road widening concentrate people and assets in floodplains, unstable slopes and narrow valleys.

Eg: The Kedarnath disaster, 2013 demonstrated how intensive construction and pilgrim concentration can magnify losses during extreme rainfall and flash floods.
4.

Ecosystem loss and weakened protection: Destruction of forests, wetlands, dunes and mangroves removes natural barriers against landslides, floods and cyclonic storm surges.

Eg: Odisha’s mangrove belts, including those around Bhitarkanika, demonstrate how ecosystem buffers can reduce exposure to cyclone-driven coastal hazards.

Managing the contradiction through disaster-risk reduction

1.

Multi-hazard zonation: Landslide, flood, seismic, avalanche and coastal-risk maps must guide master plans and prohibit critical infrastructure in high-risk zones.

Eg: GSI landslide susceptibility maps can guide road alignments, settlement regulation and relocation planning across vulnerable Himalayan and Western Ghats districts.
2.

Carrying-capacity-based development: Infrastructure density, tourist inflow, vehicle numbers and water demand should remain within the ecological and evacuation capacity of each region.

Eg: The Mishra Committee, 1976 recommended restrictions on heavy construction and excavation in Joshimath—advice whose relevance became evident in 2023.
3.

Cumulative disaster-impact assessment: Project appraisal must evaluate basin-wide and landscape-level risks from clusters of dams, roads and townships, not merely individual projects.

Eg: The Supreme Court-appointed High-Powered Committee examined the cumulative and independent impacts of the Char Dham project on Himalayan valleys.
4.

Climate-resilient engineering standards: Designs must account for future rainfall extremes, GLOFs and seismic loads through larger drainage, safer spillways and slope bio-engineering.

Eg: After the Teesta-III collapse, the CWC mandated GLOF studies for new dams having glacial lakes in their catchments and began reviewing vulnerable dams.
5.

Technology-based early warning: Satellites, Doppler radars, automatic weather stations, lake sensors and siren networks must provide actionable last-mile warnings.

Eg: The CWC monitors 902 Himalayan glacial lakes and water bodies, while NDMA-led teams assess high-risk lakes for early-warning interventions.
6.

Protection of natural infrastructure: Restoring forests, wetlands, river floodplains and mangroves provides cost-effective protection while preserving biodiversity and livelihoods.

Eg: Room for the River-type floodplain restoration can reduce peak flows more sustainably than continuous embankment construction in Himalayan river valleys.
7.

Community-centred preparedness: Local communities should participate in risk mapping, project appraisal, evacuation planning and monitoring of environmental safeguards.

Eg: Aapda Mitra volunteers can support last-mile warning, evacuation and first response in remote settlements where professional responders require time to arrive.
8.

Risk-informed investment and audits: Projects should undergo disaster-risk screening, periodic structural safety audits and dedicated maintenance throughout their lifecycle.

Eg: The Sendai Framework’s “Build Back Better” principle requires damaged roads, bridges and utilities to be reconstructed to higher resilience standards.
Conclusion

Ecologically sensitive areas require neither a development freeze nor unregulated construction, but development within risk thresholds. Making disaster-risk assessment a binding part of planning can transform infrastructure from a risk multiplier into a resilience asset.

Q8. Discuss the aim and goals of Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity framework. Mention India’s commitments and initiatives to achieve the goals and targets of this framework giving suitable examples.

10 Marks
Introduction

Adopted under the Convention on Biological Diversity at COP-15 in December 2022, the Kunming–Montreal framework provides a global roadmap for nature recovery. It links action up to 2030 with the vision of living in harmony with nature by 2050.

Body

Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Fig: Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Aim of the framework: Action by 2030

1.

Reverse biodiversity loss: Bring the loss of high-biodiversity areas close to zero through biodiversity-inclusive spatial planning and ecosystem management.

Eg: Land- and sea-use decisions must account for ecologically important forests, wetlands, grasslands, coasts and wildlife corridors.
2.

Restore and conserve ecosystems: Place at least 30% of degraded ecosystems under restoration and effectively conserve 30% of terrestrial, inland-water and marine areas.

Eg: The 30×30 target includes protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures with equitable governance.
3.

Reduce direct threats: Halt species extinction, halve invasive-species introduction and substantially reduce pollution, nutrient losses and pesticide risks.

Eg: Special priority is accorded to controlling invasive alien species in vulnerable island and freshwater ecosystems.
4.

Transform economic behaviour: Mainstream biodiversity into government, business and consumption decisions while halving global food waste and harmful incentives.

Eg: The framework seeks to reduce biodiversity-harmful incentives by US$500 billion annually and mobilise US$200 billion yearly.

Goals of the framework: Outcomes by 2050

1.

Goal A—protect and restore nature: Maintain ecosystem integrity and connectivity, halt human-induced extinction and preserve genetic diversity.

Eg: It seeks a tenfold reduction in extinction rate and risk, alongside healthy populations of native species.
2.

Goal B—prosper with nature: Sustainably use biodiversity and restore ecosystem services essential for present and future generations.

Eg: Mangroves simultaneously provide fish nurseries, carbon storage, livelihoods and protection from storm surges.
3.

Goal C—share benefits fairly: Increase equitable sharing of benefits from genetic resources, digital sequence information and associated traditional knowledge.

Eg: Communities conserving medicinal plants should receive benefits when their resources or knowledge are commercially utilised.
4.

Goal D—invest and collaborate: Secure finance, technology transfer, capacity-building and scientific cooperation, especially for developing countries.

Eg: The framework aims progressively to close the estimated US$700-billion annual biodiversity-finance gap (CBD Secretariat).

India’s commitments

1.

Updated national roadmap: India launched its National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2024–2030 at COP-16 in Cali on 30 October 2024.

Eg: The roadmap commits India to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030 and pursue harmony with nature by 2050.
2.

Twenty-three national targets: India adopted 23 National Biodiversity Targets, corresponding to the global targets but adapted to national circumstances and priorities.

Eg: They assign domestic responsibilities across conservation, sustainable use, restoration, benefit-sharing, finance and institutional capacity.
3.

Inclusive implementation: India committed to a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach, integrating biodiversity across sectors and governance levels.

Eg: The updated NBSAP involved consultations with 23 Union ministries, states, experts, communities and other stakeholders.
4.

Community rights and equity: India reaffirmed participation of local communities, protection of traditional knowledge and fair access-and-benefit sharing.

Eg: The national approach recognises communities as knowledge holders and conservation partners, rather than merely programme beneficiaries.
5.

Accountable implementation: India committed to indicator-based monitoring, sectoral integration, biodiversity-expenditure assessment and mobilisation of implementation resources.

Eg: The NBSAP connects national targets with responsible agencies, implementation strategies and monitoring indicators.

India’s initiatives

1.

Area-based habitat conservation: India is expanding protected areas, conservation and community reserves, tiger reserves and wildlife corridors to secure connected landscapes.

Eg: India’s protected-area network reached 1,134 in 2025, while Madhav became the country’s 58th tiger reserve.
2.

Restoration of degraded ecosystems: Green India Mission, CAMPA and MISHTI support restoration of degraded forests, wildlife habitats and mangroves.

Eg: MISHTI, launched in 2023, promotes ecologically suitable mangrove restoration through convergence and community participation along India’s coastline.
3.

Wetland and coastal conservation: Wetlands Rules, 2017, Amrit Dharohar and National Coastal Mission promote ecosystem management and sustainable local livelihoods.

Eg: Indore and Udaipur became India’s first internationally accredited Wetland Cities, integrating wetland protection with urban governance.
4.

Species recovery and monitoring: Project Tiger, Project Elephant, Project Dolphin and Project Snow Leopard combine habitat protection, population estimation and conflict mitigation.

Eg: India’s first nationwide snow-leopard assessment estimated 718 individuals, creating a scientific baseline for high-altitude conservation.
5.

Community governance and benefit-sharing: The Biological Diversity Act, 2002, amended in 2023, establishes decentralised conservation and access-benefit-sharing institutions.

Eg: Biodiversity Management Committees prepare People’s Biodiversity Registers and facilitate benefits for communities conserving commercially accessed biological resources.
Conclusion

India must now translate national targets into time-bound, financed and independently monitored ecological outcomes. Success will lie in making protected areas as well as production landscapes biodiversity-positive.

Q9. Explain how fake news and disinformation pose threat to Internal Security and Public Order in Indian context? In this regard, discuss salient features of amendments in respect of Information Technology (Intermediatory Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021.

10 Marks
Introduction

Fake news is false information presented as authentic news, whereas disinformation is deliberately created to deceive. Their rapid digital amplification can convert online manipulation into offline violence, panic and strategic vulnerability.

Body

Threats to internal security and public order

1.

Communal violence: Fabricated visuals exploit religious or ethnic fault lines and mobilise groups towards retaliatory violence.

Eg: An unrelated video circulated before the 2013 Muzaffarnagar riots aggravated communal hostility.
2.

Mob vigilantism: Viral allegations bypass verification and provoke crowds to punish innocent persons based on suspicion.

Eg: WhatsApp-based child-lifting rumours contributed to lynchings across several States during 2017–18.
3.

Hostile information warfare: Foreign networks spread false military claims to confuse citizens, weaken morale and discredit security forces.

Eg: During Operation Sindoor, 2025, over 1,400 hostile URLs were blocked.
4.

Electoral manipulation: Deepfakes and fabricated endorsements distort voter choice and undermine confidence in electoral legitimacy.

Eg: The ECI’s January 2025 advisory required prominent labelling of AI-generated election material.
5.

Public panic: False claims about lockdowns, disasters or shortages can trigger migration, hoarding and administrative disruption.

Eg: Fabricated reports of another nationwide COVID-19 lockdown threatened panic among migrant workers.
6.

Institutional distrust: Repeated falsehoods create competing realities and weaken trust in government, police and professional media.

Eg: Decontextualised visuals concerning Manipur’s ethnic violence intensified polarisation and obstructed reconciliation.

Salient features of amendments to the IT Rules, 2021

1.

Strengthened due diligence: Intermediaries must make reasonable efforts against patently false, misleading, impersonating and violence-inciting content.

Eg: Non-compliance may remove their safe-harbour protection under Section 79 of the IT Act.
2.

Rights-based platform governance: Intermediaries must ensure accessibility, privacy and transparency while enforcing their user agreements.

Eg: The amendment specifically requires respect for citizens’ rights under Articles 14, 19 and 21.
3.

Grievance appellate committees: An aggrieved user may appeal an intermediary’s decision to a three-member GAC within 30 days.

Eg: The online appellate mechanism endeavours to decide the appeal within 30 calendar days.
4.

Government fact-check provision: It covered Union government-related information identified by its notified FCU as fake, false or misleading.

Eg: Kunal Kamra case, 2024 struck it down, the Supreme Court declined a stay in March 2026.
5.

Safeguarded takedowns: Removal notices must be reasoned, legally grounded, URL-specific and issued by authorised senior officers.

Eg: Police notices require a DIG-rank officer, followed by Secretary-level monthly proportionality review.
6.

Synthetic-content safeguards: Platforms must restrict unlawful deepfakes and label permissible synthetic audio-visual content with persistent provenance.

Eg: The amendment also prescribes seven-day, 36-hour, two-hour and three-hour response windows for different complaints and orders.
Conclusion

India requires swift action against demonstrably harmful falsehoods without suppressing criticism, satire or dissent. Independent oversight, platform accountability, media literacy and credible official communication must operate together.

Q10. Ladakh is strategically located between China and Pakistan. As a measure to win hearts and minds of locals, discuss the Border Area Development Programmes (BADP) by the Central Government and civic actions by the Army. Also discuss demand of promulgation of provision of the Sixth Schedule of constitution for Ladakh.

10 Marks
Introduction

Ladakh is a high-altitude strategic frontier where security along the LAC with China and the western sectors facing Pakistan depends not merely on military deployment but also on resilient local communities. Thus, development and civil-military trust form an important component of comprehensive border management.

Body

Map of Ladakh

Fig: Map of Ladakh

Strategic significance of Ladakh

1.

Two-front strategic location: Ladakh links sensitive sectors involving both China and Pakistan, making stable settlements and reliable connectivity critical security assets.

Eg: Depsang-Demchok-Chushul face the China frontier, while Siachen-Dras-Kargil constitute crucial western security sectors.
2.

Local population as force multiplier: In difficult terrain, settled and supportive border communities contribute to situational awareness, logistics and effective administrative presence.

Eg: Villages such as Chushul, Hanle, Demchok and Turtuk lie in strategically sensitive frontier regions of Ladakh.

Border area development programmes

1.

Strategic infrastructure: BADP fills critical infrastructure gaps in remote border habitations, strengthening both civilian resilience and effective territorial administration.

Eg: BADP covers gaps in roads, bridges, health, education, drinking water and sanitation in eligible border areas.
2.

Preventing border depopulation: Livelihoods and basic services reduce migration from frontier settlements, maintaining a permanent civilian presence near sensitive borders.

Eg: VVP-I promotes tourism, skills, cooperatives and connectivity specifically to create incentives for residents to remain in border villages.
3.

Last-mile connectivity: Roads, telecom and energy infrastructure reduce isolation and enhance the State’s ability to reach strategically important remote communities.

Eg: VVP provides road, telecom and renewable-energy connectivity to selected northern-border villages, including in Ladakh.
4.

Evolving border strategy: BADP is in its sunset phase, while VVP now emphasises comprehensive development of strategically located frontier villages.

Eg: Ladakh received ₹8.2353 crore BADP committed liability in 2025-26, VVP-I covers 662 northern-border villages.

Army civic actions

1.

Winning local confidence: Operation Sadbhavana uses military civic action to address local needs and strengthen trust between frontier populations and the Army.

Eg: Projects are selected with local communities and civil administration, while avoiding duplication of civilian schemes.
2.

Educational outreach: Army-supported schooling and exposure programmes strengthen human development and deepen national integration among remote border communities.

Eg: The Army runs 7 Army Goodwill Schools in Ladakh, educating more than 2,200 students.
3.

Healthcare security: Army medical outreach fills accessibility gaps created by extreme altitude and dispersed settlements, strengthening confidence in national institutions.

Eg: Op Netra 1.0, April 2026, screened 950 patients from areas including Chushul, Hanle, Demchok, Drass and Turtuk.
4.

Youth and women engagement: Skill, sports and empowerment initiatives reduce alienation while increasing opportunities for populations in remote security-sensitive regions.

Eg: Kargil Ignited Minds supports girl students from Kargil in preparing for admission to professional institutions.
5.

Strategic national integration: Civic outreach strengthens psychological integration and builds sustained community cooperation in areas exposed to external security pressures.

Eg: A 2025 Army expedition across Ladakh interacted with 1,100 students in 11 schools and Ladakh University.

Demand for Sixth Schedule safeguards

1.

Constitutional protection: The demand seeks safeguards under the Sixth Schedule read with Articles 244(2) and 275(1) for Ladakh’s tribal population and institutions.

Eg: Sixth Schedule arrangements presently operate in tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram.
2.

Land and resource security: Supporters seek stronger control over land and natural resources, especially important in Ladakh’s ecologically fragile and strategically sensitive environment.

Eg: Sixth Schedule councils can make laws on specified matters including land use and management of certain local resources.
3.

Cultural security: Constitutional safeguards are sought to protect tribal identity, customs and traditional institutions amid socioeconomic and demographic transformation.

Eg: Sixth Schedule councils possess specified powers concerning inheritance, marriage, social customs and village administration.
4.

Greater local participation: The demand also reflects aspirations for stronger representative governance after Ladakh became a UT without legislature in 2019.

Eg: Existing LAHDCs of Leh and Kargil provide decentralisation, while Ladakhi groups seek stronger constitutional safeguards.
5.

Ongoing calibrated response: The Centre has pursued dialogue while introducing safeguards without yet extending the Sixth Schedule to Ladakh.

Eg: By 2025, measures included 84% ST reservation, one-third women reservation in councils and official status for Bhoti and Purgi.
Conclusion

In Ladakh, development is a security multiplier and local trust is strategic capital. Combining vibrant frontier settlements, sustained Army-community partnership and credible constitutional safeguards can strengthen India’s whole-of-nation border security.

Q11. Explain the key challenges for India’s energy security. What measures do you suggest for ensuring energy security along with economic growth and sustainability?

15 Marks
Introduction

Energy security rests on availability, accessibility, affordability and environmental acceptability. India must power a fast-growing economy while preventing imported fuels, carbon lock-in and external technologies from becoming strategic vulnerabilities.

Body

India Installed Power Capacity Mix

Fig: India’s Installed Power Capacity Mix

Key challenges to India’s energy security

1.

High import dependence: India imports over 85% of its crude-oil requirement and substantial gas, exposing inflation, exchange rates and growth to external shocks.

Eg: Red Sea disruptions since 2023 increased voyage distances, freight and insurance costs for energy cargoes travelling between Asia and Europe.
2.

Demand–supply pressure: Industrialisation, cooling, electric mobility and data centres are increasing peak demand faster than firm capacity and network expansion.

Eg: India met a record peak demand of about 256 GW in August 2026, CEA projects it to reach 277.2 GW during 2026–27.
3.

Coal–climate dilemma: Coal provides affordable domestic baseload power but creates emissions, pollution, water stress and the risk of long-term carbon lock-in.

Eg: India produced 1,047.5 MT coal in 2024–25, even as its NDC and net-zero goal require progressive power-sector decarbonisation.
4.

Renewable-integration gap: Solar and wind variability requires storage, forecasting, flexible generation and transmission beyond merely adding renewable capacity.

Eg: CEA projects a requirement of about 47.2 GW battery storage and 26.7 GW pumped storage by 2031–32 for grid balancing.
5.

Distribution-sector weakness: Technical losses, theft, subsidy delays and weak billing restrict discom capacity to invest in reliable, affordable electricity supply.

Eg: Despite recent improvement, national AT&C losses remained 15.04% in 2024–25, indicating continuing leakage in power distribution.
6.

Clean-technology dependence: India depends on imported battery cells, critical minerals, permanent magnets and several upstream solar-manufacturing inputs.

Eg: Import dependence for lithium-ion cells and rare-earth-based magnets can substitute oil insecurity with a new clean-energy supply-chain insecurity.
7.

Climate and security vulnerability: Extreme weather and cyberattacks can disrupt generation, dams, pipelines, substations and fuel-transport infrastructure.

Eg: The South Lhonak GLOF of 2023 caused the failure of Teesta-III dam, demonstrating the vulnerability of Himalayan energy infrastructure.

Measures for energy security along with economic growth and sustainability

1.

Diversified sourcing and strategic reserves: India should diversify suppliers, negotiate long-term contracts and expand emergency petroleum and gas storage.

Eg: Strategic reserves at Visakhapatnam, Mangaluru and Padur provide about 5.33 MT of crude storage, proposed expansion can lengthen emergency cover.
2.

Domestic fuel and mineral capability: Responsible exploration, mineral processing, overseas acquisition and recycling can reduce conventional and clean-energy import risks.

Eg: The National Critical Mineral Mission, 2025 provides ₹16,300 crore in government expenditure and anticipates ₹18,000 crore investment by public-sector entities.
3.

Renewables with transmission planning: Solar, wind, hydro and bioenergy additions must be synchronised with interstate lines and Green Energy Corridors.

Eg: India had 283.46 GW non-fossil capacity by March 2026, including 150.26 GW solar and 56.09 GW wind capacity.
4.

Storage and firm low-carbon power: Battery storage, pumped hydro and nuclear capacity should provide balancing, reserves and dependable electricity during non-solar hours.

Eg: India targets over 400 GWh storage by 2032 and 100 GW nuclear power by 2047, against 8.78 GW nuclear capacity in July 2026.
5.

Energy-efficiency-first growth: Efficient industry, appliances, buildings and demand response can lower fuel imports without reducing economic output or household welfare.

Eg: UJALA distributed over 36 crore LED bulbs, while PAT mandates energy-intensity reductions for designated energy-intensive industries.
6.

Petroleum substitution in transport and industry: Electric mobility, biofuels, public transport and green hydrogen can reduce oil use and urban emissions.

Eg: India achieved 20% ethanol blending in 2025–26, reportedly saving over ₹1.84 lakh crore in foreign exchange cumulatively.
7.

Distribution reform and resilient access: Smart metering, targeted subsidies, cost-reflective tariffs and climate-proof networks can improve viability while protecting vulnerable consumers.

Eg: Under RDSS, 3.90 crore smart meters were installed by December 2025, supporting better billing, consumption monitoring and loss reduction.
Conclusion

India needs an energy system that is diverse in sources, domestic in capability and efficient in consumption. Such a transition can power sustained growth while protecting affordability, strategic autonomy and ecological stability.

Q12. How are startups in India promoting entrepreneurship, innovation and employment? Discuss the global and domestic challenges in their working and suggest suitable measures to overcome these challenges.

15 Marks
Introduction

India’s startup ecosystem has evolved from a metropolitan technology phenomenon into a broad-based engine of enterprise and innovation. By June 2026, India had over 2.3 lakh DPIIT-recognised startups, with nearly half emerging from Tier-II/III cities.

Body

Growth of DPIIT Recognised Startups in India

Fig: Growth of DPIIT Recognised Startups

Role of startups in entrepreneurship, innovation and employment

1.

Democratising entrepreneurship: Startups have lowered entry barriers for first-generation entrepreneurs and spread enterprise beyond traditional business families and metropolitan centres.

Eg: Nearly 50% of recognised startups originate from Tier-II/III cities, widening India’s entrepreneurial geography.
2.

Deepening women entrepreneurship: The ecosystem is creating greater space for women as founders, directors and partners, strengthening inclusive enterprise creation.

Eg: Over 1.07 lakh recognised startups had at least one woman director/partner by March 2026.
3.

Driving technological innovation: Startups translate research and emerging technologies into commercially scalable products across AI, biotech, space, clean-tech and digital services.

Eg: Startups filed over 4,480 patent applications in FY 2025-26, against over 2,850 in FY 2024-25.
4.

Generating employment: Young enterprises create direct jobs while generating indirect opportunities across logistics, professional services, manufacturing and platform ecosystems.

Eg: DPIIT-recognised startups had generated over 23.36 lakh direct jobs by March 2026, including about 4.99 lakh during FY 2025-26.
5.

Solving India-specific problems: Startups combine technology with scalable business models to address gaps in agriculture, healthcare, mobility, finance and public services.

Eg: The Economic Survey 2025-26 notes widening startup innovation across biotech, AI, digital services and sustainability-oriented solutions.
6.

Expanding market competition: Startups challenge incumbents with new products and business models, improving consumer choice and pushing established firms towards innovation.

Eg: By August 2026, 42,242 startups had secured GeM orders worth over ₹65,633 crore, opening public procurement to innovative firms.

Global challenges

1.

Global funding volatility: Startups dependent on foreign venture capital remain vulnerable to high interest rates, risk aversion and tightening global liquidity.

Eg: The Economic Survey 2025-26 notes higher global interest rates raising capital costs and weakness in international investment flows.
2.

Geopolitical fragmentation: Trade tensions and strategic technology restrictions can disrupt access to overseas markets, capital, components and critical technologies.

Eg: Semiconductors, AI hardware and other deep-tech sectors increasingly operate within strategically contested global supply chains.
3.

Intense global competition: Indian startups compete with better-capitalised innovation ecosystems for technology, markets, skilled researchers and intellectual property.

Eg: Frontier sectors such as AI, quantum, biotechnology and space require high-risk R&D expenditure before commercial returns emerge.
4.

External demand uncertainty: Global slowdown and protectionist measures can constrain exports and overseas expansion, particularly for internationally oriented startups.

Eg: Early-stage SaaS and technology exporters are especially exposed to changes in enterprise spending in major foreign markets.

Domestic challenges

1.

Funding gap across stages: Seed funding has expanded, but deep-tech and scale-up ventures require larger pools of patient capital because commercialisation periods are longer.

Eg: The new ₹10,000-crore FoF 2.0 explicitly prioritises deep-tech, early-growth and innovative manufacturing startups.
2.

Research-commercialisation gap: Strong academic research does not always translate into patents, prototypes and scalable enterprises due to weak industry-academia linkages.

Eg: The ₹1-lakh-crore RDI Scheme supports high-risk, high-impact R&D and private-sector innovation, including deep-tech startups.
3.

Regulatory complexity: Multiple sector-specific licences, taxation requirements and compliance obligations disproportionately raise costs for young firms with limited administrative capacity.

Eg: Government initiatives such as Jan Vishwas and Business Reform Action Plan seek to reduce compliance burdens on enterprises.
4.

Uneven ecosystem depth: Although startups are spreading geographically, specialised mentors, venture funds, laboratories and skilled talent remain concentrated around major innovation hubs.

Eg: Maharashtra, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi and Gujarat remained leading regions in startup numbers and employment in March 2026.
5.

High mortality and scalability challenge: Product-market mismatch, weak cash flows and managerial deficiencies can prevent promising ventures from becoming sustainable businesses.

Eg: Government data separately tracks recognised startups that become dissolved or struck-off, indicating that recognition does not ensure commercial survival.

Measures to strengthen the startup ecosystem

1.

Mobilise patient domestic capital: Pension, insurance and institutional capital should increasingly support professionally managed venture funds, reducing excessive dependence on overseas funding cycles.

Eg: FoF 2.0, notified in April 2026 with ₹10,000 crore, seeks to crowd-in private capital through SEBI-registered AIFs.
2.

Build deep-tech financing: Long-tenor finance and specialised funds should support technologies where high R&D costs and long gestation discourage conventional venture capital.

Eg: The RDI Scheme provides a ₹1-lakh-crore framework for high-risk innovation, including support for Deep-Tech Funds of Funds.
3.

Strengthen university-industry linkages: Technology-transfer offices, shared laboratories and industry-backed incubators can convert publicly funded research into commercially viable products.

Eg: IIT Roorkee’s ₹1,000-crore Super Endowment initiative aims to support research translation and deep-tech entrepreneurship.
4.

Create government as first buyer: Procurement norms should provide credible domestic demand for innovative products before startups attempt large-scale private or overseas expansion.

Eg: Startup Runway and SWAYATT on GeM facilitate startup participation in government procurement and market access.
5.

Deepen regional ecosystems: Incubators, accelerators, research facilities and local funding networks should be strengthened around universities and industrial clusters beyond major metros.

Eg: Startup India Seed Fund Scheme has selected 219 incubators, approving funding for more than 3,400 startups.
6.

Ease entry-to-exit regulation: Predictable taxation, simpler compliance, faster IPR processing and efficient insolvency mechanisms can allow entrepreneurs to innovate without excessive regulatory costs.

Eg: The 2026 revised DPIIT framework extends recognition parameters for deep-tech startups to accommodate their longer gestation periods.
Conclusion

India must progress from being a startup-rich economy to an innovation-led scale-up economy, producing globally competitive firms rooted in domestic capabilities. Patient capital, deep-tech R&D and easier market access can make startups a cornerstone of Viksit Bharat 2047.

Q13. How Indian agriculture has been transformed from food scarcity to food surplus level? Explain the various government policies implemented for diversification of Indian agriculture.

15 Marks
Introduction

At Independence, India produced only about 50.8 million tonnes of foodgrains in 1950–51 and later depended on concessional imports. Scientific farming, institutional support and public procurement have since created food self-sufficiency, with output estimated at 376.56 million tonnes in 2025–26.

Body

Transformation from food scarcity to food surplus

1.

Green revolution: High-yielding varieties, chemical inputs and improved agronomy substantially raised wheat and rice productivity from the mid-1960s.

Eg: Kalyan Sona and Sonalika wheat varieties made Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh major surplus-producing regions.
2.

Irrigation development: Multipurpose projects, canal networks, groundwater irrigation and rural electrification reduced monsoon dependence and facilitated multiple cropping.

Eg: The Bhakra-Nangal project provided reliable irrigation for intensive wheat–rice cultivation in north-western India.
3.

Price and procurement support: MSP, FCI procurement and buffer stocking ensured remunerative markets and encouraged investment in productivity-enhancing inputs.

Eg: Central procurement supplies foodgrains for the National Food Security Act, 2013 and the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana.
4.

Agricultural research and extension: ICAR, agricultural universities and Krishi Vigyan Kendras developed and disseminated location-specific technologies and improved seeds.

Eg: Short-duration and disease-resistant varieties enabled higher yields and increased cropping intensity across diverse agro-climatic regions.
5.

Accessible inputs and credit: Fertiliser support, certified seeds, mechanisation and institutional credit improved farmers’ ability to undertake timely farm operations.

Eg: The Kisan Credit Card scheme, 1998 provides revolving credit for crop production and allied agricultural requirements.
6.

Risk and resource management: Crop insurance, soil testing, micro-irrigation and weather advisories protected production against climatic and agronomic uncertainties.

Eg: PM Fasal Bima Yojana and Soil Health Cards support risk mitigation and balanced nutrient application respectively.
7.

Outcome of sustained transformation: Higher productivity, cropping intensity and institutional support converted recurring shortages into record production and exportable surpluses.

Eg: Foodgrain output increased from 265.05 million tonnes in 2013–14 to 376.56 million tonnes in 2025–26.

Government policies for diversification of Indian agriculture

1.

Diversification beyond paddy: The Crop Diversification Programme under RKVY promotes alternative crops in original Green Revolution states and tobacco-growing regions.

Eg: Punjab and Haryana incentivise shifts from water-intensive paddy towards maize, pulses, oilseeds and horticultural crops.
2.

Horticulture promotion: The Mission for Integrated Development of Horticulture supports planting material, protected cultivation, post-harvest management and cold chains.

Eg: The Clean Plant Programme, 2024, with ₹1,765.67 crore, provides disease-free planting material for fruit crops.
3.

Oilseed diversification: NMEO–Oil Palm, 2021 and NMEO–Oilseeds, 2024 support quality seeds, acreage expansion, processing and better market linkages.

Eg: NMEO–Oilseeds has an outlay of ₹10,103 crore for 2024–25 to 2030–31 to reduce edible-oil import dependence.
4.

Pulse self-reliance: The National Food Security Mission and Mission for Aatmanirbharta in Pulses encourage pulse acreage, climate-resilient seeds and value-chain development.

Eg: The ₹11,440-crore mission launched in 2025 focuses particularly on tur, urad and masoor.
5.

Millet-based farming: The NFSM–Nutri Cereals promotes climate-resilient millets requiring relatively fewer inputs and offering better nutritional value.

Eg: The International Year of Millets, 2023 expanded branding and markets for Shree Anna, including ragi, jowar and bajra.
6.

Allied-sector diversification: PM Matsya Sampada Yojana, Rashtriya Gokul Mission and National Livestock Mission diversify incomes into fisheries, dairying and livestock.

Eg: Dairy cooperatives such as Amul demonstrate how assured procurement and processing generate regular income beyond seasonal crops.
7.

Markets and value addition: e-NAM, Agriculture Infrastructure Fund, PMFME and the 10,000-FPO scheme support aggregation, storage, processing and market access.

Eg: By October 2025, 10,000 FPOs enrolled about 50 lakh farmers, strengthening markets for diversified produce.
Conclusion

India must now progress from food surplus to nutritional security, remunerative farming and ecological sustainability. Agro-climatic planning, assured markets and local value chains can make diversification both profitable and climate-resilient.

Q14. Discuss the different types of subsidies and supports provided by the Government of India to agricultural sector. Examine the related issues pertaining to Agreement on Agriculture of World Trade Organisation (WTO).

15 Marks
Introduction

Agricultural support in India serves three functions—remunerative farm incomes, stable food production and affordable consumer access. However, WTO rules often assess these livelihood-oriented interventions through trade-distortion benchmarks designed for commercially organised agriculture.

Body

Types of agricultural subsidies and supports in India

1.

Price and procurement support: MSP, government procurement and buffer stocking protect farmers against price crashes while supplying foodgrains for welfare programmes.

Eg: FCI and state agencies procure rice and wheat at MSP for buffer stocks and distribution under the National Food Security Act.
2.

Input subsidies: Subsidised fertilisers, electricity, irrigation, seeds and machinery reduce cultivation costs, especially for small and marginal farmers.

Eg: Under nutrient-based subsidy, fertiliser companies receive support to make phosphatic and potassic fertilisers available below market-linked prices.
3.

Direct income support: Unconditional transfers supplement farm income without directly determining crop choice, input use or marketed production.

Eg: PM-KISAN transfers ₹6,000 annually in three instalments to eligible landholding farmer families through direct benefit transfer.
4.

Credit and interest support: Concessional institutional credit reduces dependence on moneylenders and enables timely purchase of inputs and farm equipment.

Eg: The Modified Interest Subvention Scheme provides short-term Kisan Credit Card loans at concessional rates, with incentives for prompt repayment.
5.

Risk-management support: Crop insurance and disaster assistance protect farm incomes against droughts, floods, cyclones, pests and production losses.

Eg: PM Fasal Bima Yojana caps farmers’ premium at 2% for kharif, 1.5% for rabi and 5% for annual commercial or horticultural crops.
6.

Public goods and infrastructure: Government expenditure on research, extension, irrigation, storage, roads and digital markets improves productivity without directly fixing output.

Eg: The Agriculture Infrastructure Fund supports warehouses, cold chains, grading units and primary-processing facilities through interest subvention and credit guarantees.
7.

Diversification and value-chain support: Assistance for horticulture, livestock, fisheries, FPOs and food processing reduces excessive dependence on rice–wheat cultivation.

Eg: MIDH and Operation Greens support horticultural production, post-harvest infrastructure and value-chain development for perishable commodities.

WTO Agreement on Agriculture and related issues

The Agreement on Agriculture rests on three pillars—domestic support, market access and export competition. Domestic support is classified into reducible Amber Box, production-limiting Blue Box and minimally distorting Green Box support.

1.

Outdated reference prices: Market-price support is calculated using the fixed 1986–88 external reference price, without adequately accounting for decades of inflation.

Eg: India’s present MSP for rice appears highly subsidised when compared with a frozen 1986–88 price, even if its real value has risen modestly.
2.

Restrictive de minimis ceiling: Developing countries may provide product-specific and non-product-specific support up to only 10% of the respective production value.

Eg: Large procurement for millions of small rice farmers can breach the limit, although per-farmer support remains far below that in developed countries.
3.

Public stockholding uncertainty: MSP procurement for food security is counted as trade-distorting support, creating tension between WTO rules and India’s welfare obligations.

Eg: The Bali Peace Clause, 2013 protects eligible programmes subject to transparency conditions, but no permanent solution emerged even at MC14 in 2026.
4.

Asymmetry in subsidy entitlements: Some developed members retain large historical Aggregate Measurement of Support entitlements, while India mainly relies on de minimis flexibility.

Eg: The United States and European Union can support agriculture through inherited AMS limits alongside crop insurance and decoupled payments.
5.

Green Box imbalance: Green Box subsidies face no expenditure ceiling, although large decoupled income, insurance and infrastructure support can influence production and trade.

Eg: Wealthier members possess greater fiscal capacity to shift support from the Amber Box into formally permissible Green Box programmes.
6.

Export-support constraints: The Nairobi decision restricts agricultural export subsidies, narrowing India’s policy space for freight, marketing and surplus-disposal assistance.

Eg: A 2021 WTO panel found India’s challenged sugar support and export schemes inconsistent with AoA provisions, India appealed the findings.
7.

Market-access and import-surge concerns: Tariff-reduction pressures can expose small farmers to subsidised imports, while a permanent Special Safeguard Mechanism remains unresolved.

Eg: Sudden increases in low-priced edible-oil or pulse imports can depress domestic prices before ordinary tariff adjustments protect cultivators.

Way forward

1.

Permanent food-security solution: Update reference prices for inflation or calculate support using actual procurement rather than total eligible production.

Eg: India and the G-33 advocate a permanent public-stockholding solution that protects genuine food-security programmes.
2.

Development-sensitive disciplines: WTO rules should evaluate subsidies through per-farmer support, farm size and livelihood vulnerability, not aggregate expenditure alone.

Eg: Input and investment assistance to low-income and resource-poor farmers already receives special treatment under Article 6.2 of the AoA.
3.

Rebalance domestic support: Developed-country AMS entitlements and trade-influencing Green Box programmes require stricter caps and transparency.

Eg: Comparable disclosure of crop insurance, decoupled payments and environmental support would make subsidy disciplines more equitable.
4.

Reorient domestic subsidies: India should gradually shift from open-ended input subsidies towards income support, irrigation efficiency, research and climate-resilient infrastructure.

Eg: Direct transfers and micro-irrigation support can protect incomes while reducing groundwater depletion and imbalanced fertiliser use.
Conclusion

India should defend legitimate policy space for smallholder livelihoods and food security while making support more targeted and environmentally responsible. WTO reform must discipline trade distortion without treating developmental agriculture as commercial protectionism.

Q15. Mention salient features of ‘Mission Drishti’. Discuss the imaging techniques used in the satellite launched on 3rd May 2026. Why it is being considered world’s first satellite of its kind?

15 Marks
Introduction

India’s private space ecosystem has moved from building components to developing sophisticated end-to-end Earth-observation missions. Mission Drishti, launched on 3 May 2026, represents this transition by integrating complementary optical and radar sensing on one indigenous private satellite platform.

Body

Mission Drishti OptoSAR Satellite

Fig: Mission Drishti – OptoSAR Satellite

Salient features of Mission Drishti

1.

Private Earth-observation mission: Drishti is an Earth-observation satellite developed by Bengaluru-based space startup GalaxEye.

Eg: At about 190 kg, it is India’s largest privately developed Earth-observation satellite.
2.

OptoSAR payload: It integrates Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Multispectral Imaging (MSI) sensors on the same spacecraft.

Eg: Optical clarity is combined with all-weather radar sensing, removing dependence on either sensor alone.
3.

All-weather observation: SAR enables observation despite clouds and darkness, overcoming a major limitation of conventional optical satellites.

Eg: This is particularly useful during monsoon floods and cyclones, when dense clouds can obscure optical observations.
4.

High-resolution capability: Its sensors provide detailed imagery suitable for object detection, change monitoring and infrastructure assessment.

Eg: The X-band SAR provides up to 0.9-m resolution in Spotlight mode, while MSI has 3.6-m native GSD.
5.

Low-Earth orbit: Drishti operates in a Sun-synchronous low-Earth orbit, enabling systematic and repeatable Earth observation.

Eg: GalaxEye places Drishti at approximately 500 ±10 km altitude, with a stated revisit frequency of around four days.
6.

Wide applications: Combined imagery supports defence, agriculture, disaster management, infrastructure, environmental monitoring and insurance applications.

Eg: SAR can map flood inundation through clouds, while multispectral data can assist crop and vegetation assessment.

Imaging techniques used in Mission Drishti

1.

Multispectral optical imaging: MSI passively records reflected sunlight in multiple wavelength bands, revealing spectral characteristics of Earth-surface objects.

Eg: Drishti carries a 7-band MSI, including Coastal Blue, Red Edge and Near-Infrared (NIR) bands.
2.

Synthetic Aperture Radar imaging: SAR actively transmits microwave pulses and measures returned backscatter to generate high-resolution surface images.

Eg: Drishti uses an X-band, VV-polarised SAR supporting Stripmap and Spotlight imaging modes.
3.

Day-night radar imaging: As an active sensor, SAR supplies its own electromagnetic signal and therefore does not require sunlight for observation.

Eg: Drishti can obtain radar observations at night, unlike passive optical imaging dependent on reflected solar radiation.
4.

Cloud-penetrating observation: Microwave wavelengths used by SAR can operate through cloud cover, greatly improving imaging availability during adverse weather.

Eg: SAR can observe terrain during cloud-covered monsoon conditions, when optical sensors may be unable to obtain usable imagery.
5.

Complementary sensor fusion: Optical data provides spectral and visually intuitive information, while SAR provides structural and all-weather information.

Eg: Drishti produces fused OptoSAR imagery, combining complementary information from both sensors for improved interpretation.

Mission Drishti considered the world’s first of its kind

1.

First OptoSAR satellite: It is described as the world’s first satellite to combine SAR and MSI sensors on a single commercial imaging platform.

Eg: The Government of India recognised Drishti as the world’s first OptoSAR satellite after its May 2026 launch.
2.

Same-platform observations: Both sensors observe from the same spacecraft, reducing spatial and temporal mismatches associated with combining separate satellites.

Eg: GalaxEye states that both data streams can be captured in a single pass, producing inherently aligned observations.
3.

Combines complementary strengths: Optical imaging supplies spectral clarity while SAR supplies all-weather, day-night reliability on the same mission.

Eg: Clouds that obscure the MSI can still be penetrated by the satellite’s SAR, maintaining observation continuity.
4.

Analysis-ready fused product: Co-located sensors enable integrated datasets rather than requiring imagery acquired separately at different times and geometries.

Eg: GalaxEye reports 1.8-m fused OptoSAR data resolution, designed for downstream analytics and automated applications.
5.

Private-space capability: The mission demonstrates that Indian startups can develop sophisticated sensor payloads and complete operational Earth-observation spacecraft.

Eg: Prime Minister termed Drishti’s launch a major achievement in India’s space journey and private-sector innovation.
Conclusion

Mission Drishti represents a shift from simply acquiring more satellite images towards obtaining richer, reliable and complementary Earth intelligence. Its OptoSAR architecture can strengthen India’s capabilities in disaster resilience, agriculture, infrastructure and strategic surveillance.

Q16. What is agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Explain its working. Describe its applications with suitable examples. Discuss the advantages, risks and challenges associated with agentic AI systems.

15 Marks
Introduction

AI is evolving from systems that merely generate answers to systems capable of independently pursuing objectives. Agentic AI marks this transition from passive assistance to reasoning, tool-using and action-oriented intelligence.

Body

About agentic AI

1.

Goal-directed autonomy: Agentic AI refers to systems that perceive their environment, make decisions and autonomously perform actions to fulfil specified objectives.

Eg: Google Project Mariner can interact with websites and undertake tasks such as searching and purchasing event tickets under user control.
2.

Composite architecture: It combines a foundation model with planning, memory, external tools, guardrails and feedback mechanisms rather than relying on a model alone.

Eg: Salesforce Agentforce uses the Atlas Reasoning Engine to analyse business data, select actions and complete customer-service workflows.
3.

Beyond generative AI: Generative AI produces content in response to prompts, while agentic AI executes multi-step workflows and modifies its conduct according to outcomes.

Eg: GitHub Agent HQ, 2025, allows developers to assign, steer and monitor multiple coding agents through a unified control system.

Working of Agentic AI

Fig: Working of Agentic AI

Working of agentic AI

1.

Perception and goal interpretation: The agent understands instructions and gathers contextual information from interfaces, sensors, databases or documents.

Eg: Anthropic’s computer-use capability interprets screenshots and identifies interface elements before deciding where to click or type.
2.

Task decomposition and planning: The reasoning model breaks a complex objective into subtasks and determines their appropriate sequence.

Eg: OpenAI Deep Research independently plans searches, examines numerous online sources and synthesises them into a cited report.
3.

Tool selection and execution: The agent selects authorised APIs, browsers, applications or code environments and performs the planned actions.

Eg: ChatGPT agent, 2025, uses a virtual computer and connected applications to research and complete multi-step online tasks.
4.

Evaluation and adaptation: Results are evaluated against the objective, enabling the agent to correct errors and revise subsequent actions.

Eg: AlphaEvolve, 2025, repeatedly generates, tests and improves algorithms using automated evaluators and evolutionary selection.

Applications of agentic AI

1.

Software engineering: Agents can explore repositories, repair defects, implement features and validate code without continuous developer prompting.

Eg: GitHub Copilot coding agent, generally available in September 2025, runs tests and opens pull requests for human review.
2.

Cybersecurity: Specialised agents can investigate alerts, classify threats and automate routine defensive responses at machine speed.

Eg: Microsoft Security Copilot agents, 2025, undertake functions such as phishing triage and vulnerability-remediation support.
3.

Customer services: Enterprise agents can consult organisational data, resolve routine queries and escalate exceptional cases to human personnel.

Eg: 1-800Accountant’s Agentforce autonomously resolved 70% of chat engagements during tax week in 2025 (Salesforce case study).
4.

Scientific research: Agentic systems can operate computational tools and search large solution spaces beyond manual experimentation.

Eg: Google’s AI co-scientist, 2025, uses multiple specialised agents to generate, debate and rank biomedical research hypotheses.

Advantages of agentic AI

1.

Productivity improvement: End-to-end task execution reduces administrative effort and processing time across document-intensive workflows.

Eg: Uber’s advertising team reported 83% faster RFP intake and processing using Agentforce (Salesforce customer study).
2.

Faster service delivery: Continuous autonomous resolution reduces waiting periods while reserving human intervention for complex cases.

Eg: Equinox reported reducing customer-response time from 48 hours to 17 seconds after deploying Agentforce.
3.

Personalised experience: Agents can combine real-time context with user history to provide individually tailored assistance and recommendations.

Eg: At SaaStr AI London, an Agentforce-powered voice concierge delivered personalised event schedules to hundreds of attendees.
4.

Operational scalability: Organisations can manage rising workloads without proportionately increasing repetitive human labour or fragmented software systems.

Eg: Trustpilot reported a 99% reduction in its service backlog after deploying Agentforce and Data 360.

Risks and challenges

1.

Agent hijacking: Malicious instructions concealed in webpages or documents can redirect an agent towards unintended actions or information disclosure.

Eg: NIST’s 2025 agent-hijacking evaluation demonstrated the danger of indirect prompt injection against tool-using agents.
2.

Autonomous security failures: Agent-generated code or actions may introduce vulnerabilities at a scale exceeding conventional human oversight.

Eg: GitHub reported in June 2026 that automatic validation had prevented hundreds of potential security leaks in agent-generated code.
3.

Privacy and accountability: Access to multiple databases raises consent and surveillance concerns, while liability is dispersed among several actors.

Eg: An agent processing Indian citizens’ data without valid consent could breach the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.
4.

Standards and capacity deficit: Reliable benchmarks, interoperable protocols, affordable compute and skilled AI auditors remain insufficient for large-scale deployment.

Eg: NIST launched the AI Agent Standards Initiative in February 2026, reflecting continuing gaps in agent security and interoperability standards.
Conclusion

Agentic AI should be governed through bounded autonomy, least-privilege access, continuous evaluation and human approval for consequential actions. Audit trails and the NIST govern–map–measure–manage framework can reconcile technological innovation with accountability and public trust.

Q17. What are the challenges to solid waste management in India? Discuss the governmental policy framework on solid waste management. Discuss the success/failure cases of Delhi and Indore cities highlighting the salient feature of their solid waste management initiatives.

15 Marks
Introduction

India’s expanding cities are producing increasingly complex streams of organic, plastic, electronic and hazardous waste. The challenge is to replace the linear collect–transport–dump model with scientifically managed circular-resource systems.

Body

Municipal Solid Waste Management

Fig: Municipal Solid Waste Management

Challenges to solid waste management in India

1.

Poor source segregation: Mixing wet, recyclable and hazardous waste lowers material recovery, contaminates compost and makes scientific processing expensive.

Eg: The Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026 mandate segregation into wet, dry, sanitary and special-care waste at source.
2.

Legacy dumpsites: Unscientific dumps generate methane, fires, toxic smoke and leachate while occupying valuable urban land.

Eg: Delhi’s Bhalswa dumpsite contained nearly 73 lakh tonnes of legacy waste in June 2022.
3.

Processing and infrastructure gaps: Collection often expands faster than material-recovery, composting, biomethanation and sanitary-landfill capacity.

Eg: India’s solid-waste processing increased from about 17% in 2014 to over 77% by 2024, but the remaining waste still risks dumping.
4.

Technological mismatch: India’s moisture-rich mixed waste has low calorific value, reducing the efficiency of incineration and increasing emission-control requirements.

Eg: Wet waste is better treated through composting or biomethanation, while waste-to-energy requires segregated, high-calorific residual material.
5.

Financial and behavioural constraints: Weak cost recovery, low user-fee compliance, littering and exclusion of informal waste-pickers undermine municipal operations.

Eg: Bulk generators account for nearly 30% of solid waste, necessitating decentralised processing and stronger responsibility.

Governmental policy framework

1.

Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026: Effective from 1 April 2026, the Rules supersede the 2016 framework and institutionalise four-stream segregation and circularity.

Eg: Wet waste must undergo biological treatment, whereas dry waste must be routed through material recovery facilities.
2.

Polluter-pays enforcement: Environmental compensation, user fees, facility audits and higher charges for unsegregated landfilling strengthen compliance.

Eg: State pollution control boards can levy environmental compensation for improper management, false reporting or operation without registration.
3.

Bulk-generator responsibility: Extended Bulk Waste Generator Responsibility makes large establishments accountable for collection, transportation and processing.

Eg: Bulk generators must process wet waste on-site where feasible or obtain an EBWGR certificate from the local body.
4.

Mission-based infrastructure: Swachh Bharat Mission-Urban 2.0, 2021–26 promotes garbage-free cities, source segregation, scientific processing and waste-to-wealth facilities.

Eg: The Dumpsite Remediation and Action Plan accelerates biomining towards “Lakshya Zero Dumpsites.”
5.

Stream-specific regulation: Plastic, e-waste, biomedical, hazardous and construction-and-demolition waste are governed through specialised rules.

Eg: Plastic Waste Management Rules employ extended producer responsibility, while the E-Waste Management Rules, 2022 prescribe recycling targets.

Delhi as a case of partial initiatives but systemic failure

1.

Persistent landfill dependence: Continued reliance on Ghazipur, Bhalswa and Okhla shows inadequate diversion of fresh waste from disposal sites.

Eg: Recurrent fires and leachate at these dumpsites have produced severe air, soil, groundwater and public-health risks.
2.

Weak upstream segregation: Mixed collection reduces recycling and sends unsuitable material to composting and waste-to-energy facilities.

Eg: Delhi’s treatment facilities coexist with garbage mountains because adequate processing depends upon clean, segregated feedstock.
3.

Remediation without complete prevention: Biomining and waste-to-energy plants address accumulated and residual waste, but continuing fresh inflows delay closure.

Eg: This illustrates the need to combine dumpsite remediation with decentralised wet-waste processing and ward-level material recovery.
4.

Progress remains incomplete: Accelerated biomining has recovered land, although substantial legacy waste continues to require treatment.

Eg: By 26 May 2026, around 43 of Bhalswa’s 70 acres were reclaimed, but approximately 23.17 lakh tonnes remained.

Indore as a success case

1.

Segregation-led logistics: Compartmentalised door-to-door vehicles and route monitoring prevent remixing during collection and transportation.

Eg: Segregated wet waste is sent for biological treatment, while dry material moves to sorting and recycling facilities.
2.

Integrated processing chain: Indore combines composting, biomethanation, material recovery and authorised disposal according to waste characteristics.

Eg: Its 550-tonne-per-day Bio-CNG plant can produce around 17,000 kg CNG and 100 tonnes of compost daily.
3.

Circular and viable financing: User charges, penalties, public-private investment and sale or use of recovered products support operating costs.

Eg: The Bio-CNG plant was developed through a ₹150-crore PPP, with the municipality committed to purchasing at least half of its CNG output.
4.

Data-driven citizen participation: Continuous awareness, grievance redressal, worker involvement and strict monitoring made segregation a durable civic practice.

Eg: Following repeated leading performances, Indore entered the Super Swachh League in Swachh Survekshan 2024–25.
Conclusion

India requires segregation before collection, processing before disposal and recovery before landfilling. Delhi reveals the cost of downstream dependence, while Indore shows that appropriate technology succeeds when backed by financial viability and behavioural compliance.

Q18. “Community participation is the cornerstone of effective disaster management”. Analyse this statement with suitable examples from India. Also discuss the challenges to community participation and measures to strengthen it.

15 Marks
Introduction

Disasters are experienced locally before they are managed institutionally, hence, the community constitutes the first responder and the last-mile recipient of warnings. Its participation transforms disaster management from episodic relief into continuous preparedness, mitigation, response and recovery.

Body

Community participation is indispensable

1.

Golden-hour response: Trained residents can provide evacuation, first aid, light search-and-rescue and relief before specialised agencies reach the affected area.

Eg: By 2025, one lakh Aapda Mitras across 350 vulnerable districts had helped evacuate 78,000 people and facilitate treatment that saved 129 lives.
2.

Effective last-mile warning: Local volunteers convert scientific forecasts into trusted, location-specific instructions and reach households beyond digital communication networks.

Eg: During Cyclone Fani, 2019, Odisha’s shelter committees and volunteers assisted the evacuation of over one million people before landfall.
3.

Local risk intelligence: Communities possess knowledge of flood channels, unstable slopes, safe routes, vulnerable households, livestock and locally available resources.

Eg: Odisha’s Venkatraipur and Noliasahi became India’s first UNESCO-IOC Tsunami Ready communities in 2020 through hazard maps, signage and evacuation drills.
4.

Context-sensitive recovery: Community institutions identify genuine livelihood and shelter needs, improve relief targeting and promote locally accepted reconstruction.

Eg: After the 2018 Kerala floods, Kudumbashree women supported house-cleaning, relief distribution and livelihood restoration at the neighbourhood level.
5.

Risk awareness and behavioural compliance: Participation creates ownership of evacuation plans, safe construction and preventive action, reducing dependence on coercive administration.

Eg: Ahmedabad’s Heat Action Plan uses public advisories, health workers and community outreach to promote hydration, altered work timings and early treatment.

Challenges to community participation

1.

Episodic engagement: Communities are mobilised during emergencies but receive insufficient attention during risk mapping, mitigation and maintenance of preparedness.

Eg: Evacuation routes and emergency contact lists prepared during one-time mock drills often become outdated before the next flood or cyclone season.
2.

Unequal representation: Women, migrants, elderly persons, persons with disabilities and marginalised communities may be absent from decision-making structures.

Eg: NDMA’s Disability-Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction Guidelines, 2019 recognise gaps such as inaccessible shelters and non-accessible warning formats.
3.

Limited volunteer capacity: Volunteers may lack refresher training, protective equipment, insurance and clarity regarding coordination with official responders.

Eg: Spontaneous rescuers operating during urban floods face electrocution, contaminated water and structural-collapse risks without certified training or equipment.
4.

Warning and trust deficit: Technical, delayed or repeated false warnings create confusion and warning fatigue, particularly among fishers and remote communities.

Eg: A generic cyclone alert is ineffective unless it specifies the affected coast, expected impact, safe shelter and evacuation deadline in local languages.
5.

Weak integration with formal systems: Community knowledge is often collected consultatively but not incorporated into district plans, budgets and emergency operations.

Eg: Village hazard maps have little operational value when evacuation routes are absent from district response plans and incident-response protocols.

Measures to strengthen community participation

1.

Institutionalise community-based planning: Participatory hazard, vulnerability and capacity assessments should guide village, ward and district disaster-management plans.

Eg: The NDMA Guidelines on Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024 provide an updated framework for participation across the disaster cycle.
2.

Develop a permanent volunteer cadre: Aapda Mitras should receive periodic certification, role-specific equipment, insurance and linkage with emergency operation centres.

Eg: NDMA’s Aapda Mitra Community Volunteering Framework, 2026 seeks structured coordination rather than ad hoc volunteering.
3.

Scale youth and women’s participation: NCC, NSS, NYKS, Scouts and Guides, self-help groups and women volunteers should be trained for locally relevant hazards.

Eg: Yuva Aapda Mitra, with an approved outlay of ₹470.50 crore, targets training about 2.37 lakh youth volunteers.
4.

Create inclusive response systems: Local plans must provide accessible alerts, evacuation assistance, separate shelter facilities and continuity of medicines and assistive devices.

Eg: Ward-level registers can pre-identify pregnant women, dialysis patients, elderly persons and persons with disabilities requiring assisted evacuation.
5.

Connect technology with human networks: Impact-based warnings should flow through apps, sirens, community radio, panchayat volunteers and door-to-door communication.

Eg: Alerts from Sachet, Damini and FloodWatch can be translated by local volunteers into actionable messages for farmers, fishers and remote settlements.
Conclusion

Communities should be treated neither as passive victims nor as substitutes for state capacity, but as co-producers of disaster resilience. Combining scientific forecasting and professional response with trained local networks can realise the Sendai Framework’s people-centred approach in India.

Q19. Separatist movements have been one of the major factors contributing to militancy and instability in Jammu & Kashmir (J & K). Bring out actions taken by the Government to bring J & K into national mainstream. Discuss pre and post abrogation status of Articles 370 and 35A. Also bring out positive impacts of abrogation of both articles in mainstreaming the state.

15 Marks
Introduction

J&K’s prolonged instability has resulted from the interplay of Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism, infiltration, separatist mobilisation and local support networks. Mainstreaming therefore requires dismantling the terror ecosystem while expanding democratic participation, development and citizens’ stakes in peace.

Body

Separatist movements as a factor behind militancy and instability

1.

Ideological radicalisation: Separatist narratives promoted alienation from constitutional institutions and created an enabling environment for radicalisation and terrorist recruitment.

Eg: JKLF-Y and Jamaat-e-Islami J&K remain declared unlawful associations under the UAPA.
2.

Terror-support ecosystem: Separatist mobilisation intersected with OGWs, terror financing and propaganda networks, providing logistical and social support to militancy.

Eg: NIA, SIA and J&K Police have acted against terror-financing and logistical networks associated with terrorism.
3.

Street mobilisation: Separatist-sponsored stone-pelting and hartals disrupted normal life, challenged public order and facilitated mobilisation of vulnerable youth.

Eg: J&K witnessed 1,328 organised stone-pelting incidents in 2018.
4.

Cross-border exploitation: Pakistan-backed terrorist organisations exploited local grievances and separatist narratives to facilitate infiltration, recruitment and propaganda.

Eg: LoC infiltration remains a threat addressed through fencing, surveillance and multi-tier security deployment.

Government actions to bring J&K into the national mainstream

1.

Dismantling the terror ecosystem: Intelligence-led operations target terrorists alongside their financiers, recruiters, harbourers and logistical support structures.

Eg: Army, J&K Police, CAPFs, NIA and SIA undertake coordinated counter-terror and terror-financing operations.
2.

Democratic mainstreaming: Representative institutions channel political aspirations through constitutional mechanisms, shrinking the space available for separatist mobilisation.

Eg: The 2024 J&K Assembly elections recorded 63.88% turnout and restored an elected government.
3.

Development-led stabilisation: Infrastructure, education, healthcare and livelihoods address governance deficits that can otherwise contribute to alienation and instability.

Eg: The ₹80,068-crore PM Development Package covers major connectivity and socioeconomic projects in J&K.
4.

Youth engagement: Skills, employment, education and sports create alternatives to radicalisation while strengthening young people’s economic stakes in peace.

Eg: Mission Youth and Himayat promote skill development, livelihoods and constructive youth engagement in J&K.

Pre-abrogation status of Articles 370 and 35A

1.

Special constitutional arrangement: Article 370 governed the application of provisions of the Constitution of India to the erstwhile State of J&K.

Eg: Constitutional provisions were progressively extended to J&K through Presidential Orders issued under Article 370.
2.

Separate constitutional framework: J&K possessed its own Constitution, operating alongside those provisions of the Constitution of India applicable to it.

Eg: The Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir came into force on 26 January 1957.
3.

Permanent-resident provisions: Article 35A empowered the J&K legislature to define permanent residents and provide specified special rights to them.

Eg: These covered immovable property, State employment, settlement and scholarships within the erstwhile State.
4.

Differential application of laws: Parliament’s legislative framework did not automatically operate identically in J&K, although extensive integration had occurred before 2019.

Eg: Numerous constitutional provisions and Central laws had been progressively extended to J&K through Article 370 mechanisms.

Post-abrogation status of Articles 370 and 35A

1.

Article 370 made inoperative: The 2019 Presidential Orders and declaration ended the operative special constitutional arrangement under Article 370.

Eg: The Supreme Court in December 2023 upheld the 2019 action, affirming the temporary character of Article 370.
2.

Article 35A ceased to operate: Supersession of the 1954 Constitution Application Order removed the constitutional basis through which Article 35A operated.

Eg: The earlier constitutional protection for permanent-resident-based special privileges consequently ceased to operate.
3.

Full constitutional application: The Constitution of India became applicable in its entirety, ending the separate constitutional framework of J&K.

Eg: The Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir ceased to operate following the 2019 constitutional changes.
4.

Territorial reorganisation: The J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019 changed the administrative structure of the erstwhile State.

Eg: From 31 October 2019, it became UT of J&K with legislature and UT of Ladakh without legislature.

Positive impacts of abrogation on mainstreaming

1.

Improved security environment: Terrorist-initiated violence has declined considerably, although cross-border terrorism and infiltration remain continuing security challenges.

Eg: Terrorist-initiated incidents declined from 228 in 2018 to 28 in 2024.
2.

Reduced separatist mobilisation: Organised stone-pelting and separatist-sponsored hartals have virtually disappeared, weakening mechanisms of organised street disruption.

Eg: MHA recorded zero organised stone-pelting and organised hartals during 2023 and 2024.
3.

Democratic consolidation: Greater electoral participation has strengthened constitutional politics as the legitimate avenue for articulating regional aspirations and grievances.

Eg: The 2024 election recorded 63.88% turnout, demonstrating substantial participation in representative democracy.
4.

Socioeconomic normalisation: Improved public order has facilitated tourism and livelihood activity, increasing local economic stakes in sustained peace and stability.

Eg: J&K recorded about 2.36 crore tourist visits in 2024, supporting hotels, transport, handicrafts and allied livelihoods.
Conclusion

The key achievement is the gradual shift from separatist mobilisation towards democratic participation and everyday normalcy. Consolidating it requires sustained counter-terror vigilance alongside employment, responsive governance, deradicalisation and community trust.

Q20. Discuss counterfeit currency and money laundering as major sources of terror funding in India. State the actions being taken at International level to check these menaces. Highlight the role of Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and methods of compliance by its member states in preventing terror funding.

15 Marks
Introduction

Terror networks survive by making illicit finance appear ordinary, fragmented and untraceable. In India, counterfeit currency can provide immediate operational funds, while money laundering converts proceeds from organised crime into apparently legitimate resources for sustained militancy.

Body

Terror Financing and Money Laundering Cycle

Fig: Terror Financing and Money Laundering Cycle

Counterfeit currency and money laundering as sources of terror funding

1.

Counterfeit operational finance: Cross-border FICN networks can fund recruitment, transport, weapons and forged documents while simultaneously harming monetary security.

Eg: The NIA’s Terror Funding and Fake Currency Cell specifically investigates high-quality FICN smuggling and its national-security linkages.
2.

Evolving currency threat: Security features restrict counterfeiting but do not eliminate it, detection patterns continually shift towards circulating denominations.

Eg: Counterfeit ₹500 notes increased during 2025–26, although several other denominations recorded declines (RBI Annual Report 2025–26).
3.

Crime–terror convergence: Proceeds from narcotics, extortion and illegal arms are laundered through hawala, shell entities and cash-intensive businesses to sustain terrorism.

Eg: In August 2026, the NIA attached property in the 500-kg Attari heroin narco-terror case, linking drug proceeds with terror financing.
4.

Layering through informal channels: Small transactions, over-invoiced trade, mule accounts and virtual assets obscure the origin, destination and beneficiary of funds.

Eg: The 2017 J&K terror-funding case uncovered alleged use of hawala and cross-LoC trade channels to finance separatist activities (NIA).

Actions being taken at the international level

1.

Binding UN framework: The 1999 Terrorist Financing Convention criminalises terror funding, while UNSC Resolution 1373 of 2001 mandates prevention and asset freezing.

Eg: Resolution 1373 requires every state to prohibit financial support and deny safe haven to persons financing terrorist acts.
2.

Targeted financial sanctions: The 1267/1989/2253 regime mandates asset freezes, travel bans and arms embargoes against listed ISIL and Al-Qaida affiliates.

Eg: As updated on 18 August 2026, its sanctions list contained 252 individuals and 89 entities (UN Security Council).
3.

Operational intelligence cooperation: Egmont Group, INTERPOL and UNODC facilitate cross-border financial intelligence, tracing, arrests and recovery of illicit assets.

Eg: INTERPOL’s Operation HAECHI VI, 2025, blocked over 68,000 bank accounts and froze nearly 400 cryptocurrency wallets.
4.

Transnational legal assistance: The UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, 2000 promotes extradition, confiscation and mutual legal assistance against laundering networks.

Eg: Countries employ mutual legal-assistance treaties to obtain foreign bank records and restrain assets held in overseas jurisdictions.

Role of FATF

1.

Global standard-setting: FATF’s 40 Recommendations, updated through June 2026, provide common standards against money laundering, terror and proliferation financing.

Eg: Recommendations 5 and 6 require criminalisation of terrorist financing and implementation of targeted financial sanctions respectively.
2.

Detection of emerging threats: FATF publishes typologies and red flags concerning FICN, hawala, non-profits, crowdfunding, shell companies and virtual assets.

Eg: FATF’s counterfeit-currency study identified methods used to place proceeds from fake notes into the legitimate financial system.
3.

Peer-review and follow-up: Mutual evaluations assess both technical compliance with standards and the effectiveness of their implementation through measurable outcomes.

Eg: FATF’s September 2024 evaluation placed India in regular follow-up, requiring its next progress report after three years.
4.

Pressure on deficient jurisdictions: The grey list imposes increased monitoring, while high-risk jurisdictions face enhanced due diligence and possible countermeasures.

Eg: FATF removed Nigeria and South Africa from increased monitoring in October 2025 after completion of their action plans.

Methods of compliance by member states

1.

Criminalisation and asset freezing: Members outlaw money laundering and terror financing and provide for confiscation and immediate freezing of designated assets.

Eg: India operationalises these obligations through the PMLA, 2002 and UAPA, 1967, including Section 17A for freezing terrorist assets.
2.

KYC and beneficial ownership: Banks and other regulated entities verify customers, controlling natural persons and the purpose of high-risk transactions.

Eg: The United Kingdom introduced mandatory identity verification for company directors and persons with significant control through Companies House from November 2025
3.

Financial-intelligence reporting: Institutions maintain transaction records and report suspicious transactions and counterfeit-note detections to specialised agencies.

Eg: In Australia, banks and other reporting entities must submit Suspicious Matter Reports to AUSTRAC whenever suspicion arises on reasonable grounds.
4.

Regulation of new technologies: Members register virtual-asset providers, apply customer due diligence and obtain originator–beneficiary information for transfers.

Eg: India brought virtual digital asset service providers under the PMLA in March 2023, requiring registration and reporting to FIU-IND.
Conclusion

India’s response must move from tracing money after violence to disrupting the financial ecosystem before mobilisation. Integrated FICN intelligence, real-time cross-border cooperation and technology-neutral AML/CFT supervision can deny terror networks both resources and anonymity.

UPSC Mains 2026 GS Paper 3 Synopsis: FAQs

How many questions are covered in this GS Paper 3 synopsis?

The page covers all 20 questions from UPSC Mains 2026 General Studies Paper 3, including both 10-mark and 15-mark questions.

Why are the complete UPSC questions used as headings?

Using the full question keeps its directive and multiple demands visible, which is especially useful in GS Paper 3 where many questions require explanation, analysis and suggestions within the same answer.

How should aspirants use this synopsis?

Attempt each question independently first and then compare your structure, examples, dimensions and conclusion with the synopsis. Use it to improve answer relevance and organisation rather than memorising the material word for word.