Context: The Supreme Court clarified that State governments remain free to close or withdraw First Information Reports (FIRs) registered against student protesters during mass agitations, provided they strictly follow procedures prescribed under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
About The Process for Withdrawing / Closing FIRs:
What Is an FIR?
- A First Information Report (FIR) is the first written information recorded by the police regarding the commission of a cognizable offence. Registration of an FIR sets the official criminal investigation process into motion under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
Key Features of an FIR:
- Primary Trigger for Investigation: Serves as the foundational document that empowers police authorities to investigate a cognizable offence without a prior court warrant.
- No Direct Executive Cancellation: An FIR cannot be unilaterally cancelled, revoked, or expunged by an executive order passed by a government or minister.
- Judicial Oversight: Once registered, any resolution or termination of the resulting criminal proceedings requires police filings or explicit judicial approval.
- Informational, Not Substantive Evidence: Functions as an initial report of an alleged crime; it does not constitute conclusive evidence until corroborated during trial.
How an FIR / Criminal Case Can Be Withdrawn or Closed?
- Route One: Police Closure Report (Section 193, BNSS):
- If police investigation reveals insufficient evidence to proceed against the accused, the investigating agency submits a Closure Report (or Final Report) to the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 193 of the BNSS.
- The Magistrate holds full supervisory authority to accept the report, reject it, order further investigation, or take cognisance independently (Palaniswamy Veeraraja v. State of Karnataka, 2026).
- Route Two: Withdrawal from Prosecution (Section 360, BNSS):
The Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor can file an application before the trial court seeking to withdraw from the prosecution at any time before judgment (Section 360 BNSS). To be valid:
-
- The decision must stem from the Prosecutor’s independent judgment, not mere executive dictation.
- The court must grant explicit consent after verifying that withdrawal is sought in good faith and public interest (Sheonandan Paswan v. State of Bihar, 1986).
- Victims must be afforded an opportunity to be heard before consent is granted.
- Route Three: Quashing by High Court (Section 528, BNSS):
- Under Section 528 of the BNSS, High Courts exercise inherent powers to quash an FIR or pending chargesheet to prevent abuse of the process of any court or to secure the ends of justice.
- High Courts can exercise this power if no prima facie case is established or if the matter has been settled amicably in non-heinous offences.
Significance:
- Withdrawing minor cases against student protesters or agitators can restore peace without burdening individuals with lasting criminal records.
- Executive decisions cannot automatically quash FIRs, preventing arbitrary withdrawal of cases and ensuring judicial scrutiny, public interest, and victims’ rights.
