Patriarchy, Public Health and Power: Why Women Must Lead India’s Health Governance

Source:  FL

Subject:   Society/Women and associated issues

Context: A recent analysis of India’s healthcare landscape reveals that entrenched patriarchal structures continue to hinder gender equity, with the female-to-male sex ratio at birth remaining at a low 917 per 1,000 boys.

Patriarchy, Public Health and Power: Why Women Must Lead India’s Health Governance
Patriarchy, Public Health and Power: Why Women Must Lead India’s Health Governance

About Patriarchy, Public Health and Power: Why Women Must Lead India’s Health Governance

What It Is?

  • This concept explores the critical link between gender inequality and systemic health failures. It posits that patriarchy acts as a social determinant of health, infecting everything from policy-making to facility-level infrastructure, and argues that women’s leadership is the only path to achieving true health equity.

Data and Stats on Women’s Health:

  • Skewed Sex Ratio: The sex ratio at birth in India stands at 917 girls to 1,000 boys, significantly lower than the natural genetic predisposition of 950, indicating persistent sex-selective practices.
  • Nutritional Crisis: Approximately 60% of women of reproductive age suffer from anemia, and 40% have sub-optimal Body Mass Indices (BMI).
  • Maternal Mortality Trends: While India reduced maternal mortality to 97 per 1,00,000 live births (2018–20), 23% of women aged 20-24 were married before 18, leading to high-risk teenage pregnancies.
  • State-Level Inequality: Recent NFHS data shows that Gujarat leads in gender inequality regarding physical health status, while Kerala maintains the lowest barriers to healthcare access.

Patriarchy as the Hidden Disease in Public Health:

  • Reproductive Reductionism: Health policies often view women solely through their reproductive roles as mothers, neglecting their health needs throughout the rest of their lives.
  • Male Child Preference: Cultural patriarchy drives recalcitrance toward laws prohibiting sex selection, undermining the genetic balance of the population.
  • Normalization of Poor Conditions: The lack of decent toilets in 81% of labor rooms reflects a systemic disregard for the dignity and hygiene needs of women.
  • Subversion of Local Power: The Panch Pati system allows husbands to usurp the statutory powers of elected women sarpanches, silencing female voices in local health planning.
  • Centralized Decision-Making: Increasing centralization of health schemes prevents local, gender-sensitive nuances from influencing policy, reinforcing a top-down patriarchal model.

Structural Barriers to Women’s Healthcare Access:

  • Facility-Level Obstacles: Lack of essential drugs and the unavailability of female healthcare providers are the most frequently reported barriers.
  • Logistical Constraints: Geographical distances compounded by a lack of safe, affordable transport inhibit women from seeking timely care.
  • Financial Independence: A lack of independent bank accounts and the inability to take health-related financial decisions keep many women dependent on male family members.
  • The Double Burden: Opportunity costs, such as unattended housework, childcare, and eldercare, often force women to prioritize family needs over their own health.
  • Inadequate Support Schemes: Programs like the PMMVY exclude mothers under 19 and provide meager benefits that fail to compensate for pregnancy-induced wage loss.

Women as Invisible Pillars of the Health System:

  • The Frontline Cadre: India relies on a massive all-female workforce of 10 lakh ASHA workers and 28 lakh Anganwadi workers.
  • Honorary Exploitation: Despite their critical role, these four million women are labeled honorary workers, denying them decent wages and formal labor rights.
  • Nursing Backbone: Women form the vast majority of the nursing and auxiliary nurse-midwife (ANM) cadres, yet they face poor working conditions and limited upward mobility.
  • Leadership Deficit: As of 2026, the MoHFW remains male-dominated, with only 6 women officers compared to a vast preponderance of men in senior advisory roles.
  • Silent Contributors: Women manage the majority of informal healthcare within the household, a contribution that is rarely quantified or supported by public policy.

Way Ahead:

  • Reserved Leadership: Implement specific reservations for women in senior health governance and decision-making positions within the MoHFW.
  • Decentralized Planning: Re-establish participatory processes that allow women to lead local health planning and social audits at the village level.
  • Universal Support: Reform maternity benefit schemes to include all mothers regardless of age or number of children, ensuring liveable wage compensation.
  • Dignified Infrastructure: Prioritize the installation of functional, private toilets and gender-sensitive facilities in every public health center.
  • Formalizing the Frontline: Transition ASHA and Anganwadi workers from honorary status to formal employees with fair wages and social security.

Conclusion:

The health of India’s women cannot be separated from the power structures that govern their lives; as long as patriarchy dictates policy, medical outcomes will remain skewed. True transformation requires moving beyond gender budgeting toward actual female command over health resources and infrastructure. Only when women lead the governance of health can the system transition from treating them as reproductive vessels to valuing them as equal citizens.