Read about Insights IAS INSTA 75 Days Revision Plan for UPSC Civil Services Prelims – 2026 [ HERE ] :
DOWNLOAD THE INSTA 75 DAYS REVISION TIMETABLE(GS) [HERE] :
DOWNLOAD THE INSTA 75 DAYS REVISION TIMETABLE(CSAT) [HERE] :
Download MITRA booklet (My Insta Tests Revision and Assessment) – It’s for to track your daily progress while following Insta 75 Days plan. [ CLICK HERE ] :
Quiz-summary
0 of 15 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
Information
Wish you Good Luck! 🙂
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 15 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
| Average score |
|
| Your score |
|
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
| Pos. | Name | Entered on | Points | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Table is loading | ||||
| No data available | ||||
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 15
1. Question
1 pointsConsider the following subjects:
- Audit of accounts of the Union
- Inter-State migration
- Elections to Parliament
- Public order
How many of the above fall under the Union List?
Correct
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Statement I – Correct:
Audit of Union accounts falls under the Union List. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audits Union finances, which is a central subject (Entry 76).Statement II – Correct:
Inter-State migration is covered under the Union List (Entry 81) as it involves movement across states, requiring uniform national regulation.Statement III – Correct:
Elections to Parliament are conducted under the supervision of the Election Commission of India, and fall under the Union List (Entry 72).Statement IV – Incorrect:
Public order is a State List subject (Entry 1), as law and order is primarily the responsibility of State governments.Incorrect
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Statement I – Correct:
Audit of Union accounts falls under the Union List. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audits Union finances, which is a central subject (Entry 76).Statement II – Correct:
Inter-State migration is covered under the Union List (Entry 81) as it involves movement across states, requiring uniform national regulation.Statement III – Correct:
Elections to Parliament are conducted under the supervision of the Election Commission of India, and fall under the Union List (Entry 72).Statement IV – Incorrect:
Public order is a State List subject (Entry 1), as law and order is primarily the responsibility of State governments. -
Question 2 of 15
2. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements regarding the Vice-President of India:
- The Electoral College for the Vice-President includes nominated members of both Houses of Parliament.
- A resolution for the removal of the Vice-President requires a special majority in the Rajya Sabha and a simple majority in the Lok Sabha.
- The Vice-President can only be removed on the grounds of ‘violation of the Constitution’.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Correct
Answer: (a)
Statement I – Correct:
The Electoral College for the Vice-President consists of members of both Houses of Parliament, including nominated members (unlike the President where nominated members are excluded).Statement II – Incorrect:
Removal of the Vice-President requires a resolution passed by a majority of all the then members of the Rajya Sabha (effective majority) and agreed to by the Lok Sabha by a simple majority. It is not a special majority.Statement III – Incorrect:
The Constitution does not specify any ground for removal of the Vice-President. Unlike the President (who can be removed for violation of the Constitution), the Vice-President can be removed without any stated grounds.Incorrect
Answer: (a)
Statement I – Correct:
The Electoral College for the Vice-President consists of members of both Houses of Parliament, including nominated members (unlike the President where nominated members are excluded).Statement II – Incorrect:
Removal of the Vice-President requires a resolution passed by a majority of all the then members of the Rajya Sabha (effective majority) and agreed to by the Lok Sabha by a simple majority. It is not a special majority.Statement III – Incorrect:
The Constitution does not specify any ground for removal of the Vice-President. Unlike the President (who can be removed for violation of the Constitution), the Vice-President can be removed without any stated grounds. -
Question 3 of 15
3. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements about the “Individual Responsibility” of Ministers:
- It is a constitutional provision under Article 75 stating that ministers hold office during the pleasure of the President.
- The President can remove a minister even at a time when the Council of Ministers enjoys the confidence of the Lok Sabha.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
Answer: (c)
Statement I – Correct:
The concept of individual responsibility of ministers is derived from Article 75(2) of the Constitution, which provides that ministers hold office during the pleasure of the President.
This implies that each minister is individually accountable for their actions and can be removed separately, unlike collective responsibility which relates to the entire Council.Statement II – Correct:
Even when the Council of Ministers enjoys the confidence of the Lok Sabha, an individual minister can still be removed.
This is because:- The removal of a minister is linked to individual responsibility, not majority support.
- The President formally exercises this power, but acts on the advice of the Prime Minister (Article 74).
- Therefore, if the Prime Minister advises removal, the President can dismiss that minister without affecting the survival of the entire Council.
Incorrect
Answer: (c)
Statement I – Correct:
The concept of individual responsibility of ministers is derived from Article 75(2) of the Constitution, which provides that ministers hold office during the pleasure of the President.
This implies that each minister is individually accountable for their actions and can be removed separately, unlike collective responsibility which relates to the entire Council.Statement II – Correct:
Even when the Council of Ministers enjoys the confidence of the Lok Sabha, an individual minister can still be removed.
This is because:- The removal of a minister is linked to individual responsibility, not majority support.
- The President formally exercises this power, but acts on the advice of the Prime Minister (Article 74).
- Therefore, if the Prime Minister advises removal, the President can dismiss that minister without affecting the survival of the entire Council.
-
Question 4 of 15
4. Question
1 pointsIn the context of the Indian Polity, consider the following statements regarding the “Kitchen Cabinet”:
- It is a formal, top-level decision-making body created under the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961.
- It may include outsiders like friends and family members of the Prime Minister.
- It reduces the authority of the Council of Ministers as the real center of power shifts to a smaller, informal circle.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Correct
Answer: (b)
Statement I – Incorrect:
The Kitchen Cabinet is not a formal body and has no constitutional or statutory basis.
It is not created under the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961. Rather, it is an informal advisory group around the Prime Minister.Statement II – Correct:
The Kitchen Cabinet may include trusted aides, friends, and even non-political persons (such as family members or close advisors) of the Prime Minister.
Its composition is flexible and entirely at the discretion of the PM.Statement III – Correct:
The functioning of a Kitchen Cabinet can undermine the role of the formal Council of Ministers, as key decisions are often taken in this smaller informal circle, shifting the real center of power away from the full Cabinet.Incorrect
Answer: (b)
Statement I – Incorrect:
The Kitchen Cabinet is not a formal body and has no constitutional or statutory basis.
It is not created under the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961. Rather, it is an informal advisory group around the Prime Minister.Statement II – Correct:
The Kitchen Cabinet may include trusted aides, friends, and even non-political persons (such as family members or close advisors) of the Prime Minister.
Its composition is flexible and entirely at the discretion of the PM.Statement III – Correct:
The functioning of a Kitchen Cabinet can undermine the role of the formal Council of Ministers, as key decisions are often taken in this smaller informal circle, shifting the real center of power away from the full Cabinet. -
Question 5 of 15
5. Question
1 pointsWhich of the following are the constitutional limitations on Parliament’s power?
- Judicial Review
- Federal Distribution of Powers
- Basic Structure Doctrine
- Directive Principles
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Correct
Answer: (b)
Statement I – Correct:
Judicial Review constitutes a fundamental limitation on the powers of Parliament. The judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court and High Courts, is empowered to examine the constitutional validity of laws and strike down those that are inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution.Statement II – Correct:
The federal distribution of legislative powers, as provided under the Seventh Schedule, imposes a structural limitation on Parliament. Parliament’s law-making authority is primarily confined to the Union List and Concurrent List, and it cannot ordinarily legislate on subjects in the State List except under constitutionally specified circumstances.Statement III – Correct:
The Basic Structure Doctrine acts as a substantive limitation on Parliament’s amending power under Article 368. Parliament is not competent to alter or destroy the essential features of the Constitution, such as judicial review, federalism, and the rule of law.Statement IV – Incorrect:
The Directive Principles of State Policy do not operate as enforceable limitations on Parliament’s powers. They are non-justiciable guidelines intended to direct the State in governance and policy formulation, but they do not impose legal constraints on legislative authority.Incorrect
Answer: (b)
Statement I – Correct:
Judicial Review constitutes a fundamental limitation on the powers of Parliament. The judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court and High Courts, is empowered to examine the constitutional validity of laws and strike down those that are inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution.Statement II – Correct:
The federal distribution of legislative powers, as provided under the Seventh Schedule, imposes a structural limitation on Parliament. Parliament’s law-making authority is primarily confined to the Union List and Concurrent List, and it cannot ordinarily legislate on subjects in the State List except under constitutionally specified circumstances.Statement III – Correct:
The Basic Structure Doctrine acts as a substantive limitation on Parliament’s amending power under Article 368. Parliament is not competent to alter or destroy the essential features of the Constitution, such as judicial review, federalism, and the rule of law.Statement IV – Incorrect:
The Directive Principles of State Policy do not operate as enforceable limitations on Parliament’s powers. They are non-justiciable guidelines intended to direct the State in governance and policy formulation, but they do not impose legal constraints on legislative authority. -
Question 6 of 15
6. Question
1 pointsWhat is the primary purpose of the Cabinet Committee system in India?
Correct
Answer: (a)
The Cabinet Committee system in India refers to a set of smaller, high-level committees of ministers constituted by the Cabinet to deal with specific areas of governance such as security, economic affairs, political matters, and appointments.
These committees are extra-constitutional and non-statutory bodies, formed for efficient and expeditious decision-making. They enable detailed examination of issues, reduce the burden on the full Cabinet, and allow specialisation and focused deliberation within the executive.
Thus, the system helps in streamlining governance and decentralising executive functions within the broader framework of the Council of Ministers.
Incorrect
Answer: (a)
The Cabinet Committee system in India refers to a set of smaller, high-level committees of ministers constituted by the Cabinet to deal with specific areas of governance such as security, economic affairs, political matters, and appointments.
These committees are extra-constitutional and non-statutory bodies, formed for efficient and expeditious decision-making. They enable detailed examination of issues, reduce the burden on the full Cabinet, and allow specialisation and focused deliberation within the executive.
Thus, the system helps in streamlining governance and decentralising executive functions within the broader framework of the Council of Ministers.
-
Question 7 of 15
7. Question
1 pointsWith reference to the State Legislature in India, consider the following statements:
- The Legislative Council is not subject to dissolution, though its membership undergoes periodic renewal.
- Parliament may provide for the creation or abolition of a Legislative Council, subject to the will of the concerned State Legislature.
- A law relating to the creation or abolition of a Legislative Council is enacted in the same manner as an ordinary law of Parliament.
- The presence of a Legislative Council reflects a constitutional design allowing variation in the legislative structure of States.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
Correct
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
- Statement 1 – Correct:
The Legislative Council (Vidhan Parishad) is a permanent chamber and is not subject to dissolution, unlike the Legislative Assembly. Its continuity is maintained through a system of staggered retirement, wherein one-third of its members retire every two years. This ensures both institutional continuity and periodic infusion of new members. - Statement 2 – Correct:
The Constitution provides that Parliament may create or abolish a Legislative Council only after the Legislative Assembly of the concerned State passes a resolution to that effect. This resolution must be supported by a special majority, reflecting the importance of State consent in altering its legislative structure. - Statement 3 – Correct:
The law enacted by Parliament for the creation or abolition of a Legislative Council is passed by a simple majority, following the procedure applicable to ordinary legislation. As per constitutional provisions, such a law is not treated as a constitutional amendment under Article 368, even though it affects the structure of the State Legislature. - Statement 4 – Correct:
The constitutional framework allows flexibility in the structure of State legislatures. While some States have a bicameral legislature, others function with a unicameral system. This reflects the principle of asymmetrical federalism, enabling States to adopt institutional arrangements suited to their specific political and administrative needs.
Incorrect
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
- Statement 1 – Correct:
The Legislative Council (Vidhan Parishad) is a permanent chamber and is not subject to dissolution, unlike the Legislative Assembly. Its continuity is maintained through a system of staggered retirement, wherein one-third of its members retire every two years. This ensures both institutional continuity and periodic infusion of new members. - Statement 2 – Correct:
The Constitution provides that Parliament may create or abolish a Legislative Council only after the Legislative Assembly of the concerned State passes a resolution to that effect. This resolution must be supported by a special majority, reflecting the importance of State consent in altering its legislative structure. - Statement 3 – Correct:
The law enacted by Parliament for the creation or abolition of a Legislative Council is passed by a simple majority, following the procedure applicable to ordinary legislation. As per constitutional provisions, such a law is not treated as a constitutional amendment under Article 368, even though it affects the structure of the State Legislature. - Statement 4 – Correct:
The constitutional framework allows flexibility in the structure of State legislatures. While some States have a bicameral legislature, others function with a unicameral system. This reflects the principle of asymmetrical federalism, enabling States to adopt institutional arrangements suited to their specific political and administrative needs.
-
Question 8 of 15
8. Question
1 pointsConsider the following pairs:
Parliamentary Term Description I. Lame-duck Session Session held after dissolution of the Lok Sabha but before the newly elected House meets II. Calling Attention Motion A device to draw the attention of a Minister to a matter of urgent public importance without prior notice III. Shadow Cabinet A constitutionally recognised body to assist the opposition in legislative functions IV. Zero Hour A period immediately after Question Hour where members can raise matters without prior notice V. Point of Order A device used to raise questions regarding the procedure or conduct of business in the House How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
Correct
Answer: (b)
Explanation
Pair I – Correct
Lame-duck Session is Session held after dissolution of the Lok Sabha but before the newly elected House meets.Pair II – Incorrect
Calling Attention Motion requires prior notice and permission of the Speaker. The phrase “without prior notice” makes this incorrect.Pair III – Incorrect
Shadow Cabinet is neither constitutional nor formally recognised in India. It is only an informal political arrangement.Pair IV – Correct
Zero Hour follows Question Hour and allows members to raise issues without prior notice, making the description accurate.Pair V – Correct
Point of Order is used to raise issues related to rules, procedure, or conduct of business in the House. The description is precise and correct.Incorrect
Answer: (b)
Explanation
Pair I – Correct
Lame-duck Session is Session held after dissolution of the Lok Sabha but before the newly elected House meets.Pair II – Incorrect
Calling Attention Motion requires prior notice and permission of the Speaker. The phrase “without prior notice” makes this incorrect.Pair III – Incorrect
Shadow Cabinet is neither constitutional nor formally recognised in India. It is only an informal political arrangement.Pair IV – Correct
Zero Hour follows Question Hour and allows members to raise issues without prior notice, making the description accurate.Pair V – Correct
Point of Order is used to raise issues related to rules, procedure, or conduct of business in the House. The description is precise and correct. -
Question 9 of 15
9. Question
1 pointsWith reference to the Registrar-General of India (RGI), consider the following statements:
- The Registrar-General of India classifies languages and dialects during Census operations based on self-reported data.
- The data collected during Census operations cannot be used as evidence in any civil or criminal proceeding.
Which one of the following is correct?
Correct
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
- Statement 1 – Correct:
Information on language is collected on a self-declaration basis during Census enumeration. The Registrar-General of India subsequently undertakes technical scrutiny, grouping and standardisation of responses to classify languages and dialects for official publication. This process involves consolidation of numerous reported mother tongues into recognised linguistic categories. - Statement 2 – Correct:
The Census Act, 1948 provides strict safeguards for confidentiality of individual data. Information collected during Census operations cannot be disclosed or used as evidence in any civil or criminal proceedings. This legal protection ensures respondent privacy and enhances the reliability and completeness of data furnished during enumeration.
Incorrect
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
- Statement 1 – Correct:
Information on language is collected on a self-declaration basis during Census enumeration. The Registrar-General of India subsequently undertakes technical scrutiny, grouping and standardisation of responses to classify languages and dialects for official publication. This process involves consolidation of numerous reported mother tongues into recognised linguistic categories. - Statement 2 – Correct:
The Census Act, 1948 provides strict safeguards for confidentiality of individual data. Information collected during Census operations cannot be disclosed or used as evidence in any civil or criminal proceedings. This legal protection ensures respondent privacy and enhances the reliability and completeness of data furnished during enumeration.
-
Question 10 of 15
10. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements regarding the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA):
- It is a statutory body under the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.
- It functions as the nodal authority for regulating both in-country and inter-country adoption.
- It is empowered to grant final legal approval for adoption cases under the Juvenile Justice framework.
Which of the statements given above is/are incorrect?
Correct
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Statement I is incorrect. CARA is indeed a statutory body; however, it functions under the Ministry of Women and Child Development, not the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. Both ministries deal with vulnerable sections, but adoption falls specifically within the domain of child welfare.
Statement II is correct. CARA serves as the central nodal authority responsible for the regulation, monitoring, and facilitation of both in-country and inter-country adoption processes in India. It ensures standardisation, transparency, and compliance with national and international norms.
Statement III is incorrect. CARA does not possess adjudicatory or judicial powers to grant adoption orders. Under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, the final legal approval of adoption is vested in competent courts. CARA’s role is limited to regulation, coordination, and oversight.
Incorrect
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Statement I is incorrect. CARA is indeed a statutory body; however, it functions under the Ministry of Women and Child Development, not the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. Both ministries deal with vulnerable sections, but adoption falls specifically within the domain of child welfare.
Statement II is correct. CARA serves as the central nodal authority responsible for the regulation, monitoring, and facilitation of both in-country and inter-country adoption processes in India. It ensures standardisation, transparency, and compliance with national and international norms.
Statement III is incorrect. CARA does not possess adjudicatory or judicial powers to grant adoption orders. Under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, the final legal approval of adoption is vested in competent courts. CARA’s role is limited to regulation, coordination, and oversight.
-
Question 11 of 15
11. Question
1 pointsThe ratio of the incomes of A and B is 5:4, and the ratio of their expenditures is 3:2. If at the end of the year, each saves ₹16,000, and B’s income increases by 25% while his expenditure remains constant, what will be the new ratio of B’s savings to A’s savings?
Correct
Answer: (b) 3:2
Solution:
Let incomes = 5x and 4x
Expenditures = 3y and 2ySavings:
- A: 5x − 3y = 16000
- B: 4x − 2y = 16000
Multiply second by 3:
12x − 6y = 48000Multiply first by 2:
10x − 6y = 32000Subtract:
2x = 16000 → x = 8000Substitute:
4x − 2y = 16000
32000 − 2y = 16000 → y = 8000B’s income = 32000, expenditure = 16000
New income of B = 32000 × 1.25 = 40000
New savings of B = 40000 − 16000 = 24000A’s savings = 16000
Ratio = 24000 : 16000 = 3 : 2
Incorrect
Answer: (b) 3:2
Solution:
Let incomes = 5x and 4x
Expenditures = 3y and 2ySavings:
- A: 5x − 3y = 16000
- B: 4x − 2y = 16000
Multiply second by 3:
12x − 6y = 48000Multiply first by 2:
10x − 6y = 32000Subtract:
2x = 16000 → x = 8000Substitute:
4x − 2y = 16000
32000 − 2y = 16000 → y = 8000B’s income = 32000, expenditure = 16000
New income of B = 32000 × 1.25 = 40000
New savings of B = 40000 − 16000 = 24000A’s savings = 16000
Ratio = 24000 : 16000 = 3 : 2
-
Question 12 of 15
12. Question
1 pointsConsider the following statements regarding three numbers x, y, and z:
- If x is 20% more than y and y is 10% less than z, then the ratio x:z is 27:25.
- If x, y, and z are in continued proportion, then y² = xz.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct
Correct
Answer: (c) Both 1 and 2
Solution:
Statement 1: correct
x = 1.2y, y = 0.9z
⇒ x = 1.2 × 0.9z = 1.08z
⇒ x : z = 1.08 : 1 = 108 : 100 = 27 : 25Statement 2: correct
Continued proportion ⇒ x/y = y/z
⇒ y² = xzIncorrect
Answer: (c) Both 1 and 2
Solution:
Statement 1: correct
x = 1.2y, y = 0.9z
⇒ x = 1.2 × 0.9z = 1.08z
⇒ x : z = 1.08 : 1 = 108 : 100 = 27 : 25Statement 2: correct
Continued proportion ⇒ x/y = y/z
⇒ y² = xz -
Question 13 of 15
13. Question
1 pointsA vessel is full of a mixture of spirit and water in which there is 20% spirit. 5 litres of the mixture are drawn off and the vessel is filled up with water. If the spirit is now 12%, what is the total capacity of the vessel?
Correct
Answer: (b) 12.5 litres
Solution:
Let total capacity = V
Initial spirit = 0.2V
When 5 litres is removed, it contains 20% spirit:
Spirit removed = 1 litreRemaining spirit = 0.2V − 1
After refilling with water:
Final spirit = 0.12VEquation:
0.2V − 1 = 0.12V
⇒ 0.08V = 1
⇒ V = 12.5 litresIncorrect
Answer: (b) 12.5 litres
Solution:
Let total capacity = V
Initial spirit = 0.2V
When 5 litres is removed, it contains 20% spirit:
Spirit removed = 1 litreRemaining spirit = 0.2V − 1
After refilling with water:
Final spirit = 0.12VEquation:
0.2V − 1 = 0.12V
⇒ 0.08V = 1
⇒ V = 12.5 litres -
Question 14 of 15
14. Question
1 pointsTwo jars P and Q contain wine and water in the ratios 5:2 and 7:6 respectively. In what ratio should the contents of the two jars be mixed so that the new mixture contains wine and water in the ratio 8:5?
Correct
Answer: (a) 7:9
Solution:
Wine fraction:
- P = 5/7
- Q = 7/13
- Required = 8/13
Apply alligation:
Difference:
|5/7 − 8/13| = 9/91
|7/13 − 8/13| = 1/13Ratio (P : Q):
1/13 : 9/91Multiply by 91:
= 7 : 9Incorrect
Answer: (a) 7:9
Solution:
Wine fraction:
- P = 5/7
- Q = 7/13
- Required = 8/13
Apply alligation:
Difference:
|5/7 − 8/13| = 9/91
|7/13 − 8/13| = 1/13Ratio (P : Q):
1/13 : 9/91Multiply by 91:
= 7 : 9 -
Question 15 of 15
15. Question
1 pointsRead the following Passage and answer the question that follows.
“The erosion of institutional autonomy is often a silent process, masked by the language of efficiency and ‘national interest.’ While centralized oversight can streamline decision-making, it frequently stifles the very dissent that fuels scientific and social progress. In a democracy, the strength of an institution is measured not by its compliance with the executive, but by its ability to provide objective, often uncomfortable, truths. When the metrics of success for a university or a research body are dictated solely by political exigency, the pursuit of knowledge becomes a secondary casualty to the pursuit of consensus.”
Which of the following is the most logical inference?
Correct
Answer: (c)
Solution:
The passage highlights that institutional autonomy enables independent decision-making and objective outcomes, which are essential for a healthy democracy. It suggests that gradual erosion of autonomy reduces the capacity of institutions to function impartially and provide unbiased assessments. While it does not completely reject oversight, it emphasizes the importance of maintaining a balance where institutions are not excessively controlled. Options (a) and (b) are extreme and unsupported, while (d) contradicts the core idea of autonomy. Therefore, the most logical inference is that institutional independence is crucial for ensuring objective functioning in a democratic system.
Incorrect
Answer: (c)
Solution:
The passage highlights that institutional autonomy enables independent decision-making and objective outcomes, which are essential for a healthy democracy. It suggests that gradual erosion of autonomy reduces the capacity of institutions to function impartially and provide unbiased assessments. While it does not completely reject oversight, it emphasizes the importance of maintaining a balance where institutions are not excessively controlled. Options (a) and (b) are extreme and unsupported, while (d) contradicts the core idea of autonomy. Therefore, the most logical inference is that institutional independence is crucial for ensuring objective functioning in a democratic system.
Click Here to Download the Insta Test PDF – Question Paper Click Here to Download the Insta Test PDF – Synopsis
Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE
Please subscribe to Our podcast channel HERE
Subscribe to our YouTube ChannelHERE
Follow our Twitter Account HERE
Follow our Instagram ID HERE
Follow us on LinkedIn : HERE








