UPSC Static Quiz – Polity : 10 January 2026 We will post 5 questions daily on static topics mentioned in the UPSC civil services preliminary examination syllabus. Each week will focus on a specific topic from the syllabus, such as History of India and Indian National Movement, Indian and World Geography, and more. We are excited to bring you our daily UPSC Static Quiz, designed to help you prepare for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination. Each day, we will post 5 questions on static topics mentioned in the UPSC syllabus. This week, we are focusing on Indian and World Geography.
Why Participate in the UPSC Static Quiz?
Participating in daily quizzes helps reinforce your knowledge and identify areas that need improvement. Regular practice will enhance your recall abilities and boost your confidence for the examination. By covering various topics throughout the week, you ensure a comprehensive revision of the syllabus.
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Best of Luck! 🙂
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
Consider the following statements regarding the financial procedures in the Parliament:
- The ‘Annual Financial Statement’ is laid before both Houses of Parliament under Article 112, but the Constitution does not explicitly use the term ‘Budget’.
- No demand for a grant can be made except on the recommendation of the President of India.
- The expenditure ‘charged’ upon the Consolidated Fund of India is not submitted to the vote of Parliament, but can be discussed in either House.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Correct
Solution: C
- Statement 1 is Correct: Article 112 of the Constitution mandates the President to lay the “Annual Financial Statement” (AFS) before Parliament. The word “Budget” is a colloquial term derived from the French word ‘bougette’ (leather bag) and finds no mention in the constitutional text.
- Statement 2 is Correct: Article 113(3) enshrines the principle of executive initiative in financial matters. It states that “No demand for a grant shall be made except on the recommendation of the President.” This ensures that financial proposals originate from the executive, preventing legislative populism where MPs might propose unlimited spending.
- Statement 3 is Correct: Article 113(1) separates expenditure ‘charged’ upon the Consolidated Fund of India (CFI) from expenditure ‘made’ from it. Charged expenditure (e.g., salaries of President, Judges, Debt charges) constitutes the sovereign obligations of the state. While it is non-votable to ensure the independence of these offices and the certainty of debt servicing, the Parliament retains the right to discuss these estimates.
Incorrect
Solution: C
- Statement 1 is Correct: Article 112 of the Constitution mandates the President to lay the “Annual Financial Statement” (AFS) before Parliament. The word “Budget” is a colloquial term derived from the French word ‘bougette’ (leather bag) and finds no mention in the constitutional text.
- Statement 2 is Correct: Article 113(3) enshrines the principle of executive initiative in financial matters. It states that “No demand for a grant shall be made except on the recommendation of the President.” This ensures that financial proposals originate from the executive, preventing legislative populism where MPs might propose unlimited spending.
- Statement 3 is Correct: Article 113(1) separates expenditure ‘charged’ upon the Consolidated Fund of India (CFI) from expenditure ‘made’ from it. Charged expenditure (e.g., salaries of President, Judges, Debt charges) constitutes the sovereign obligations of the state. While it is non-votable to ensure the independence of these offices and the certainty of debt servicing, the Parliament retains the right to discuss these estimates.
-
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
With reference to Article 293 of the Constitution of India, consider the following statements:
- A State Government can borrow directly from external (foreign) sources with the consent of the Parliament.
- A State may not raise any loan without the consent of the Government of India if there is any outstanding loan which has been made to the State by the Government of India.
- The Government of India may impose conditions while granting consent for state borrowings, such as the implementation of specific power sector reforms.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Correct
Solution: B
- Statement 1 is Incorrect: States are prohibited from borrowing externally. They can only borrow within the territory of India (Article 293(1)). External loans for state projects are routed through the Centre (Back-to-Back loans).
- Statement 2 is Correct: Article 293(3) stipulates that if a State owes a debt to the Centre (or has a Centre-guaranteed loan outstanding), it needs Centre’s consent for any fresh borrowing. This effectively places State fiscal sovereignty under Union check.
- Statement 3 is Correct: Article 293(4) allows the Centre to impose “conditions” while granting consent. The Centre has used this to enforce fiscal discipline (like FRBM targets) or specific reforms (like the additional borrowing space linked to Power Sector reforms or One Nation One Ration Card).
Incorrect
Solution: B
- Statement 1 is Incorrect: States are prohibited from borrowing externally. They can only borrow within the territory of India (Article 293(1)). External loans for state projects are routed through the Centre (Back-to-Back loans).
- Statement 2 is Correct: Article 293(3) stipulates that if a State owes a debt to the Centre (or has a Centre-guaranteed loan outstanding), it needs Centre’s consent for any fresh borrowing. This effectively places State fiscal sovereignty under Union check.
- Statement 3 is Correct: Article 293(4) allows the Centre to impose “conditions” while granting consent. The Centre has used this to enforce fiscal discipline (like FRBM targets) or specific reforms (like the additional borrowing space linked to Power Sector reforms or One Nation One Ration Card).
-
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Consider the following statements about the Parliamentary form of government:
- The head of the government is distinct from the head of the state.
- There is a strict separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches.
- The executive’s tenure is fixed and not dependent on the confidence of the legislature.
How many of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: A
- Statement 1 is correct. A key characteristic of the parliamentary system is the presence of a dual executive. The head of state (e.g., the President in India, the Monarch in the UK) is the nominal or ceremonial executive, while the head of government (the Prime Minister) is the real executive, who wields effective power. This contrasts with the presidential system, where the President is both head of state and head of government.
- Statement 2 is incorrect. The parliamentary system is defined by a fusion of powers or close collaboration between the executive and the legislature, not a strict separation. The ministers (executive) are drawn from the members of the legislature, and the executive is collectively responsible to the legislature. This overlap is a fundamental feature.
- Statement 3 is incorrect. The tenure of the executive (the Council of Ministers) is not fixed. It is entirely dependent on maintaining the confidence of the majority in the lower house of the legislature. If the government loses a no-confidence motion, it must resign. This principle of collective responsibility makes the executive’s tenure variable, unlike the fixed tenure in a presidential system.
Incorrect
Solution: A
- Statement 1 is correct. A key characteristic of the parliamentary system is the presence of a dual executive. The head of state (e.g., the President in India, the Monarch in the UK) is the nominal or ceremonial executive, while the head of government (the Prime Minister) is the real executive, who wields effective power. This contrasts with the presidential system, where the President is both head of state and head of government.
- Statement 2 is incorrect. The parliamentary system is defined by a fusion of powers or close collaboration between the executive and the legislature, not a strict separation. The ministers (executive) are drawn from the members of the legislature, and the executive is collectively responsible to the legislature. This overlap is a fundamental feature.
- Statement 3 is incorrect. The tenure of the executive (the Council of Ministers) is not fixed. It is entirely dependent on maintaining the confidence of the majority in the lower house of the legislature. If the government loses a no-confidence motion, it must resign. This principle of collective responsibility makes the executive’s tenure variable, unlike the fixed tenure in a presidential system.
-
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
With reference to the federal nature of the Indian Constitution, consider the following statements:
- The power of Parliament to form a new State by altering the boundaries of existing States under Article 3 renders the States non-sovereign.
- The provision for All-India Services (Article 312) is considered a feature that strengthens the federal principle of the Constitution.
- An amendment to the Constitution under Article 368 that affects the executive power of the States requires ratification by the legislatures of all the States.
- The phrase “Union of States” in Article 1 was chosen to signify that the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement among the States.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Correct
Solution: B
- Statement 1 is correct.Article 3 gives Parliament the power to alter the boundaries, area, or names of existing states. This provision makes the states “destructible” while the Union is “indestructible,” which is a significant unitary feature and confirms that the constituent states in India are not sovereign entities in the way they are in a classic federation like the USA.
- Statement 2 is incorrect.The provision for All-India Services (IAS, IPS, etc.) is a prominent unitary (or centripetal) feature, not a federal one. These services are recruited and trained by the Centre but serve in state cadres, allowing the Union government significant involvement and, to an extent, control over state executive machinery. It strengthens the Centre, which is contrary to the pure federal principle.
- Statement 3 is incorrect.Article 368 requires that any amendment affecting the “federal provisions” (which includes the executive power of the States) must be ratified by the legislatures of not less than one-half of the States, not all the States.
- Statement 4 is correct. B.R. Ambedkar, in the Constituent Assembly, explicitly stated that the phrase “Union of States” was used over “Federation of States” to make two things clear: first, that the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement by the states to join (unlike the USA), and second, as a consequence, no state has the right to secede from it.
Incorrect
Solution: B
- Statement 1 is correct.Article 3 gives Parliament the power to alter the boundaries, area, or names of existing states. This provision makes the states “destructible” while the Union is “indestructible,” which is a significant unitary feature and confirms that the constituent states in India are not sovereign entities in the way they are in a classic federation like the USA.
- Statement 2 is incorrect.The provision for All-India Services (IAS, IPS, etc.) is a prominent unitary (or centripetal) feature, not a federal one. These services are recruited and trained by the Centre but serve in state cadres, allowing the Union government significant involvement and, to an extent, control over state executive machinery. It strengthens the Centre, which is contrary to the pure federal principle.
- Statement 3 is incorrect.Article 368 requires that any amendment affecting the “federal provisions” (which includes the executive power of the States) must be ratified by the legislatures of not less than one-half of the States, not all the States.
- Statement 4 is correct. B.R. Ambedkar, in the Constituent Assembly, explicitly stated that the phrase “Union of States” was used over “Federation of States” to make two things clear: first, that the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement by the states to join (unlike the USA), and second, as a consequence, no state has the right to secede from it.
-
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
With reference to the Indian Independence Act, 1947, consider the following statements:
- It provided that the British Paramountcy over the Princely States would lapse and revert to the respective States, leaving them legally independent.
- It empowered the Constituent Assembly of each Dominion to repeal any Act of the British Parliament, including the Independence Act itself.
- It designated the Governor-General of India as the constitutional head with full executive authority to act in his discretion on all matters until the new Constitution was framed.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Correct
Solution: B
- Statement 1 is Correct: Section 7 of the Indian Independence Act, 1947, declared the lapse of British Paramountcy. This meant the treaties between the Crown and Princely States ended. Legally, the states regained their independence and were free to join India, Pakistan, or remain independent (though the latter was practically difficult).
- Statement 2 is Correct: This was a unique feature of the Act. It granted the Constituent Assemblies of the new Dominions plenary sovereign power. They could frame any Constitution and repeal any British Act, including the very Act that gave them independence. This ensured that the new Constitution would be autochthonous (home-grown) and not derived from British authority.
- Statement 3 is Incorrect: Under the Act, the Governor-General became a Constitutional Head. He lost the “discretionary powers” he held under the 1935 Act. He was required to act on the advice of the Council of Ministers in all The era of the Viceroy acting on his own judgment ended on August 15, 1947.
Incorrect
Solution: B
- Statement 1 is Correct: Section 7 of the Indian Independence Act, 1947, declared the lapse of British Paramountcy. This meant the treaties between the Crown and Princely States ended. Legally, the states regained their independence and were free to join India, Pakistan, or remain independent (though the latter was practically difficult).
- Statement 2 is Correct: This was a unique feature of the Act. It granted the Constituent Assemblies of the new Dominions plenary sovereign power. They could frame any Constitution and repeal any British Act, including the very Act that gave them independence. This ensured that the new Constitution would be autochthonous (home-grown) and not derived from British authority.
- Statement 3 is Incorrect: Under the Act, the Governor-General became a Constitutional Head. He lost the “discretionary powers” he held under the 1935 Act. He was required to act on the advice of the Council of Ministers in all The era of the Viceroy acting on his own judgment ended on August 15, 1947.
Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE to watch Motivational and New
Join our Twitter Channel HERE
Follow our Instagram Channel HERE
Follow us on LinkedIn : HERE
Stay Consistent
Consistency is key in UPSC preparation. By making the UPSC Static Quiz a part of your daily routine, you will steadily improve your knowledge base and exam readiness. Join us every day to tackle new questions and make your journey towards UPSC success more structured and effective.









