Q7. “Abuse of authority begins where moral restraint ends”. Discuss how ethical restraint guides responsible use of discretionary power. Suggest ways to institutionalise moral accountability in public administration. (10 M)
Difficulty Level: Medium
Reference: TH
Why the question:
Issues of ethical governance and misuse of discretionary authority, seen in many recent administrative and financial scandals, highlighting the need for moral restraint and institutional accountability in public service.Key Demand of the question:
It requires explaining how ethical restraint shapes responsible exercise of discretion and suggesting institutional mechanisms to embed moral accountability within administrative systems.Structure of the Answer:
Introduction:
Define discretionary power and link it with the moral responsibility expected under constitutional and ethical norms.
Body:
- Explain how ethical restraint (integrity, justice, empathy) ensures fair and impartial decision-making in public authority.
- Suggest reforms like ethics codes, transparent systems, whistle-blower protection, and ethical leadership training to institutionalise moral accountability.
Conclusion:
Conclude by stressing that true authority lies in self-restraint and public trust, not unregulated discretion.
