Q7. Examine the ethical dilemmas arising when perceptions of harm conflict with objective facts. How should administrators respond? (10 M)
Difficulty Level: Medium
Reference: TH
Why the question
Situations where subjective perceptions of harm clash with objective facts are increasingly visible in governance and public institutions, raising concerns about fairness, dignity, and impartiality in decision-making.Key Demand of the question
The question asks to examine ethical dilemmas that arise when perceptions of harm diverge from factual evidence, and to suggest how administrators should respond while balancing empathy, dignity, and rule of law.Structure of the Answer:
Introduction
Briefly highlight the tension between subjective perceptions and objective truth in governance, linking it to ethics in administration.
Body
- Ethical dilemmas – Dignity vs evidence, morality vs legality, impartiality vs social justice, fairness vs public trust, emotional truth vs factual truth.
- Administrator’s response – Empathy, transparent inquiry, procedural safeguards, mediation/dialogue, ethical leadership.
Conclusion
Emphasise a balanced approach where administrators uphold both dignity and truth, ensuring trust in institutions.
