Topic: India and its neighbourhood- relations
Q4. “In the absence of a coherent Tibet policy, India risks appearing both timid and reactive”. Analyse the risks of ambiguity. How can India craft a long-term approach? (10 M)
Difficulty Level: Medium
Reference: IE
Why the question
The question arises from the Dalai Lama’s recent succession announcement and China’s aggressive stance, which expose India’s lack of a structured Tibet policy and its strategic consequences.Key Demand of the question
It requires an analysis of the strategic, diplomatic, and narrative risks stemming from India’s ambiguity on Tibet, and suggestions for a well-defined long-term policy approach.Structure of the Answer:
Introduction
Highlight the strategic and civilizational relevance of Tibet to India and the rising urgency to clarify policy amidst China’s assertiveness.Body
- Analyse the risks of ambiguity, such as strategic perception loss, weakened border claims, and erosion of soft power.
- Propose long-term measures including official acknowledgment of Tibet’s relevance, institutional policy frameworks, cultural diplomacy, and regional narrative-building.
Conclusion
Argue for a calibrated yet firm policy posture that aligns national interest with regional stability and democratic values.
