Q7. “Silence in the face of moral wrong is complicity”. Analyse. What role do moral courage and whistle-blowing play in preventing such acts of injustice? (10 M)
Difficulty Level: Medium
Reference: TH
Why the question:
The police investigation into a mob violence case in Harduaganj has taken a twist after a laboratory report confirmed that the seized meat sample did not belong to a “cow or any cow progeny,” a police officer said.Key demand of the question:
The question asks for an ethical analysis of how silence sustains injustice and expects an evaluation of the role that moral courage and whistle-blowing play in disrupting such unethical outcomes.Structure of the Answer:
Introduction:
Briefly explain that ethical inaction enables systemic wrongs, while moral courage and whistle-blowing represent active resistance to injustice.Body:
- Explain how silence in public and institutional spheres legitimises injustice and weakens democratic values.
- Describe how moral courage enables individuals to stand up against unethical norms, even in adverse conditions.
- Analyse how whistle-blowing acts as a corrective tool by exposing hidden wrongs and demanding accountability.
Conclusion:
Emphasise the need to institutionalise protection and promote ethical consciousness to ensure silence does not become complicity.
