Q7. From an ethical standpoint, should the right to parole be restricted for those convicted of heinous crimes? Justify your answer. (10 M)
Difficulty Level: Medium
Reference: TH
Why the question
Two convicts in Periye double murder case apply for parole, victims’ families oppose the move.Key demand of the question
The answer must examine whether the right to parole should be restricted for heinous crime convicts, considering justice, deterrence, rehabilitation, and ethical governance. It should present both sides of the argument and conclude with a balanced ethical stance.Structure of the Answer
Introduction
Briefly explain the ethical dilemma in granting parole to heinous crime convicts—balancing justice, public safety, and reformation—and mention relevant constitutional provisions or judicial interpretations.Body
- Ethical arguments in favor of restricting parole – Discuss the need for justice to victims, deterrence, public safety, and prevention of misuse, citing examples and legal principles.
- Ethical arguments against restricting parole – Highlight aspects of human rights, rehabilitation, judicial oversight, and best practices, supported by case laws and expert opinions.
Conclusion
Provide a balanced ethical viewpoint, suggesting a merit-based approach to parole with strict checks and judicial oversight to ensure both justice and fairness.
