UPSC Static Quiz – Polity : 15 October 2024 We will post 5 questions daily on static topics mentioned in the UPSC civil services preliminary examination syllabus. Each week will focus on a specific topic from the syllabus, such as History of India and Indian National Movement, Indian and World Geography, and more.We are excited to bring you our daily UPSC Static Quiz, designed to help you prepare for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination. Each day, we will post 5 questions on static topics mentioned in the UPSC syllabus. This week, we are focusing on Indian and World Geography.
Why Participate in the UPSC Static Quiz?
Participating in daily quizzes helps reinforce your knowledge and identify areas that need improvement. Regular practice will enhance your recall abilities and boost your confidence for the examination. By covering various topics throughout the week, you ensure a comprehensive revision of the syllabus.
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Best of Luck! 🙂
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
Fundamental Rights in India are described as the Magna Carta of India. What does this imply?
Correct
Solution: c)
The Fundamental Rights in India are often referred to as the Magna Carta of India because they safeguard individual liberties and prevent the establishment of arbitrary or authoritarian rule. They serve as checks on the power of the executive and the legislature, ensuring that the rule of law prevails over despotism and tyranny. This is central to upholding political democracy and individual freedoms in India.
Incorrect
Solution: c)
The Fundamental Rights in India are often referred to as the Magna Carta of India because they safeguard individual liberties and prevent the establishment of arbitrary or authoritarian rule. They serve as checks on the power of the executive and the legislature, ensuring that the rule of law prevails over despotism and tyranny. This is central to upholding political democracy and individual freedoms in India.
-
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
Which of the following statements about the Fundamental Rights under Article 19 is correct?
Correct
solution: b)
The Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 19 are automatically suspended only during an external emergency (resulting from war or external aggression), not during internal emergencies (such as armed rebellion). This distinction reflects the seriousness of external threats to national security while maintaining certain freedoms during internal unrest. The rights under Article 19 include important freedoms like speech, assembly, and movement, but these freedoms are subject to reasonable restrictions during national emergencies for the sake of public order and security.
Incorrect
solution: b)
The Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 19 are automatically suspended only during an external emergency (resulting from war or external aggression), not during internal emergencies (such as armed rebellion). This distinction reflects the seriousness of external threats to national security while maintaining certain freedoms during internal unrest. The rights under Article 19 include important freedoms like speech, assembly, and movement, but these freedoms are subject to reasonable restrictions during national emergencies for the sake of public order and security.
-
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Consider the following statements about the enforcement and amendment of Fundamental Rights in India:
- The enforcement of Fundamental Rights is dependent solely on the discretion of the executive branch of the government.
- Fundamental Rights can be amended by a simple majority in Parliament.
- The courts in India have no role in the protection or interpretation of Fundamental Rights.
How many of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: d)
Statement 1 is incorrect. The enforcement of Fundamental Rights is a matter for the judiciary, not the executive. Individuals can approach the courts if their rights are violated, and the judiciary ensures their protection.
- Statement 2 is incorrect. Fundamental Rights cannot be amended by a simple majority; any amendment requires a constitutional amendment, which typically needs a special majority in both Houses of Parliament.
Statement 3 is incorrect. The judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court and High Courts, plays a critical role in protecting and interpreting Fundamental Rights. Judicial review ensures that the laws passed by the legislature do not violate these rights.
Incorrect
Solution: d)
Statement 1 is incorrect. The enforcement of Fundamental Rights is a matter for the judiciary, not the executive. Individuals can approach the courts if their rights are violated, and the judiciary ensures their protection.
- Statement 2 is incorrect. Fundamental Rights cannot be amended by a simple majority; any amendment requires a constitutional amendment, which typically needs a special majority in both Houses of Parliament.
Statement 3 is incorrect. The judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court and High Courts, plays a critical role in protecting and interpreting Fundamental Rights. Judicial review ensures that the laws passed by the legislature do not violate these rights.
-
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Consider the following statements regarding the limitations of Fundamental Rights in India:
- The Parliament can suspend Fundamental Rights at any time for national security reasons.
- Fundamental Rights can be suspended during a state of emergency, including the right to life and personal liberty.
- Fundamental Rights are granted only to individuals and not to groups or associations.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
solution: d)
- Statement 1 is incorrect. Parliament cannot suspend Fundamental Rights at will; they can only be suspended during a proclamation of emergency under certain conditions, as provided in the Constitution.
- Statement 2 is incorrect. Even during a state of emergency, the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 cannot be suspended. The suspension of other rights depends on the nature of the emergency and the specific provisions invoked.
Statement 3 is incorrect. Fundamental Rights are available to both individuals and groups or associations. For example, the right to form associations or unions is a collective right guaranteed under Article 19.
Incorrect
solution: d)
- Statement 1 is incorrect. Parliament cannot suspend Fundamental Rights at will; they can only be suspended during a proclamation of emergency under certain conditions, as provided in the Constitution.
- Statement 2 is incorrect. Even during a state of emergency, the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 cannot be suspended. The suspension of other rights depends on the nature of the emergency and the specific provisions invoked.
Statement 3 is incorrect. Fundamental Rights are available to both individuals and groups or associations. For example, the right to form associations or unions is a collective right guaranteed under Article 19.
-
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
Consider the following statements regarding the scope and applicability of Fundamental Rights in India:
- Fundamental Rights can only be claimed against private individuals, not against the state.
- The Supreme Court can issue writs to enforce Fundamental Rights, but the High Courts cannot.
- Fundamental Rights are the same in both the USA and India without any major differences.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct
solution: d)
- Statement 1 is incorrect. Fundamental Rights are primarily enforceable against the state, though some rights can be claimed against private individuals in specific situations, such as the right against untouchability.
- Statement 2 is incorrect. Both the Supreme Court and High Courts have the power to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights under Articles 32 and 226, respectively.
- Statement 3 is incorrect. While both India and the USA have provisions for Fundamental Rights (inspired by the Bill of Rights), the structure, scope, and implementation of these rights differ significantly between the two countries. Indian Fundamental Rights are more elaborate and cover a broader range of civil liberties.
Incorrect
solution: d)
- Statement 1 is incorrect. Fundamental Rights are primarily enforceable against the state, though some rights can be claimed against private individuals in specific situations, such as the right against untouchability.
- Statement 2 is incorrect. Both the Supreme Court and High Courts have the power to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights under Articles 32 and 226, respectively.
- Statement 3 is incorrect. While both India and the USA have provisions for Fundamental Rights (inspired by the Bill of Rights), the structure, scope, and implementation of these rights differ significantly between the two countries. Indian Fundamental Rights are more elaborate and cover a broader range of civil liberties.
Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE to watch Motivational and New
Join our Twitter Channel HERE
Follow our Instagram Channel HERE
Follow us on LinkedIn : HERE
Stay Consistent
Consistency is key in UPSC preparation. By making the UPSC Static Quiz a part of your daily routine, you will steadily improve your knowledge base and exam readiness. Join us every day to tackle new questions and make your journey towards UPSC success more structured and effective.