Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
The “Sovereignty” of India means
- No external power can dictate the government of India.
- Citizens cannot be discriminated against on any grounds.
- There is freedom of speech and expression for Indian citizens.
How many of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: a)
Only Statement 1 is correct.
Sovereignty simply implies that India is a state that takes its own decisions ultimately guided by the people. No external agency dictates terms to India.
However, the notion of sovereignty does not seep into the framework of all democratic rights. For e.g. a sovereign state might very well discriminate between its citizens.
A sovereign state may very well restrict freedom of speech, as it is not an absolute right, even though it is vital to a democracy.
Incorrect
Solution: a)
Only Statement 1 is correct.
Sovereignty simply implies that India is a state that takes its own decisions ultimately guided by the people. No external agency dictates terms to India.
However, the notion of sovereignty does not seep into the framework of all democratic rights. For e.g. a sovereign state might very well discriminate between its citizens.
A sovereign state may very well restrict freedom of speech, as it is not an absolute right, even though it is vital to a democracy.
-
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
Consider the following statements.
- Parliamentary democracy, with a cabinet form of government, is part of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.
- A balanced federal structure mandates that the States enjoy freedom without any unsolicited interference from the Central Government with respect to matters which exclusively fall within State’s domain.
Which of the above statements is/are incorrect?
Correct
Solution: d)
Parliamentary democracy, with a cabinet form of government, is part of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution. Its first article reads, “India that is Bharat shall be a Union of States.”
The Constitution has mandated a federal balance wherein independence of a certain required degree is assured to the State Governments.
As opposed to centralism, a balanced federal structure mandates that the Union does not usurp all powers and the States enjoy freedom without any unsolicited interference from the Central Government with respect to matters which exclusively fall within their domain.
Incorrect
Solution: d)
Parliamentary democracy, with a cabinet form of government, is part of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution. Its first article reads, “India that is Bharat shall be a Union of States.”
The Constitution has mandated a federal balance wherein independence of a certain required degree is assured to the State Governments.
As opposed to centralism, a balanced federal structure mandates that the Union does not usurp all powers and the States enjoy freedom without any unsolicited interference from the Central Government with respect to matters which exclusively fall within their domain.
-
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Consider the following statements regarding the observations made by Supreme Court with respect to Right to privacy.
- Right to privacy is as sacrosanct as human existence and is inalienable to human dignity and autonomy.
- This is an absolute right.
- Any surveillance done on an individual by the state is an infringement of that person’s right to privacy.
- Any violation of right to privacy by the state in national interest, has to follow procedures established by the law.
How many of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: c)
Statement 2 is incorrect.
The Court, pointing to its own judgment in K S Puttaswamy, has said that “right to privacy is as sacrosanct as human existence and is inalienable to human dignity and autonomy”. While agreeing that it is not an absolute right, the Court has said any restrictions “must necessarily pass constitutional scrutiny”.
Any surveillance or snooping done on an individual by the state or any outside agency is an infringement of that person’s right to privacy. Hence, any violation of that right by the state, even in national interest, has to follow procedures established by the law.
Incorrect
Solution: c)
Statement 2 is incorrect.
The Court, pointing to its own judgment in K S Puttaswamy, has said that “right to privacy is as sacrosanct as human existence and is inalienable to human dignity and autonomy”. While agreeing that it is not an absolute right, the Court has said any restrictions “must necessarily pass constitutional scrutiny”.
Any surveillance or snooping done on an individual by the state or any outside agency is an infringement of that person’s right to privacy. Hence, any violation of that right by the state, even in national interest, has to follow procedures established by the law.
-
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
The Constitution of India provides which of the following protection for Minorities?
- Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India having a distinct language, script or culture of its own have the right to conserve the same.
- All minorities, whether based on religion or language, have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
- A Special Officer for linguistic minorities has been appointed by the President.
How many of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: c)
What does the Constitution say about minorities?
* Article 29, which deals with the “Protection of interests of minorities”, says that “any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same”
* Article 30 deals with the “right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions”.
It says that all minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
* Article 350(A) says there shall be a Special Officer for linguistic minorities to be appointed by the President.
Incorrect
Solution: c)
What does the Constitution say about minorities?
* Article 29, which deals with the “Protection of interests of minorities”, says that “any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same”
* Article 30 deals with the “right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions”.
It says that all minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
* Article 350(A) says there shall be a Special Officer for linguistic minorities to be appointed by the President.
-
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
Consider the following statements.
- Access to justice for the weaker sections of the society is a constitutional mandate to ensure fair treatment under Indian legal system.
- Equal justice and free legal aid is one of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) under the Indian Constitution.
- Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, was enacted by Parliament to organise Lok Adalats outside the formal adjudicatory system, to address the problems of crowded cases.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Correct
- Solution: c)
Access to justice for the poor is a constitutional mandate to ensure fair treatment under our legal system. Hence, Lok Adalats (literally, ‘People’s Court’) were established to make justice accessible and affordable to all. It was a forum to address the problems of crowded case dockets outside the formal adjudicatory system.
The Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976, inserted Article 39A to ensure “equal justice and free legal aid”. To this end, the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, was enacted by Parliament and it came into force in 1995 “to provide free and competent legal services to weaker sections of the society” and to “organise Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on a basis of equal opportunity”.
Incorrect
- Solution: c)
Access to justice for the poor is a constitutional mandate to ensure fair treatment under our legal system. Hence, Lok Adalats (literally, ‘People’s Court’) were established to make justice accessible and affordable to all. It was a forum to address the problems of crowded case dockets outside the formal adjudicatory system.
The Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976, inserted Article 39A to ensure “equal justice and free legal aid”. To this end, the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, was enacted by Parliament and it came into force in 1995 “to provide free and competent legal services to weaker sections of the society” and to “organise Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on a basis of equal opportunity”.
Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE to watch Motivational and New
Join our Twitter Channel HERE
Follow our Instagram Channel HERE
Follow us on LinkedIn : HERE