EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : Growth charts — WHO standards versus India crafted

 

Source: The Hindu

 

  • Prelims: Current events of national importance(Different social service Schemes,WHO, micronutrients, MGRS, Anemia FAO, GHI, NFHS-5, ICDS, Mid-day meal scheme etc)
  • Mains GS Paper I & II: Social empowerment, development and management of social sectors/services related to Health.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

  • India uses the globally accepted World Health Organization (WHO) Growth Standards to measure malnutrition.
  • The WHO standards are based on a Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS) that was conducted in six countries between 1997 and 2003 (Brazil, Ghana, India, Norway, Oman and the United States).

INSIGHTS ON THE ISSUE

Context

Malnutrition:

  • Malnutrition is the condition that develops when the body is deprived of vitamins, minerals and other nutrients it needs to maintain healthy tissues and organ function.
  • Malnutrition occurs in people who are either undernourished or over nourished.

 

Importance of nutrition during adolescence period:

  • Adolescence is a pivotal period of cognitive development.
  • It improves the access to nutrition during this “second window of opportunity of growth”.
  • It compensates for any nutrient deficiencies acquired during early developmental stages in the girl child.
  • Adolescent health is a significant indicator of women’s labor force participation in India in the long term.
    • As better nutrition improves every young girl’s prospect to participate in productive activities.

 

Determinants of undernutrition are:

  • Food intake
  • Dietary diversity
  • Health
  • Sanitation
  • Women’s status

 

Measures of childhood undernutrition are based on anthropometric standards such as:

  • Height-for-age (stunting/chronic undernutrition)
  • Weight-for-height (wasting/acute undernutrition)

 

Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS):

  • It was conducted in six countries between 1997 and 2003
    • Brazil, Ghana, India, Norway, Oman and the United States.
  • The purpose was to determine the pattern of growth (from birth to five years) of children who did not face any known deficiencies in their environments.
  • The MGRS took a prescriptive approach, with the specific aim of setting growth ‘standards’ (how children ought to grow
    • provided they have a healthy environment) and not growth ‘references’ (how children of the reference group grow).
  • The sample for India in the MGRS was drawn from a set of privileged households living in South Delhi
    • children who met all the eligibility criteria for the study including
      • having a favorable growth environment
      • being breast-fed
      • having non-smoking mothers.

Difference between MGRS and Other Surveys:

  • An adequate number of equivalent samples are difficult to find in large-scale surveys in India given the high levels of inequality as well as the underrepresentation of the rich in these datasets.
  • For instance: Among children (six-23 months) in households of the highest quintile in National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-5 (2019-21)
    • only 12.7% meet the requirements of a ‘minimum acceptable diet’ as defined by WHO.
    • Almost all mothers in the MGRS sample had completed more than 15 years of education (in 2000-01)
    • 7% of women in NFHS-5 had completed 12 or more years of schooling.
  • The study norms of the WHO-MGRS are different from these prevalence studies.
    • For example: MGRS included a component of counseling to ensure appropriate feeding practices
    • It is missing in the NFHS or Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey.
  • The MGRS sample was for the purpose of setting prescriptive standards, most of the sampling concerns are resolved.
  • Difference in genetic growth potential of Indians with respect to others and the influence of maternal heights on child growth.
    • Maternal height is a non-modifiable factor for the growth of her child.
    • Low average maternal heights are a reflection of the intergenerational transmission of poverty and poor status of women
    • therefore, a measure of an environment of deprivation.
    • Replace: An appropriate indicator of a deficient environment, such as stunting,

Why WHO-MGRS seems to be more appropriate?

  • A number of countries with similar or even poorer economic conditions, including those in the South Asian region, have shown higher improvements in stunting prevalence using the same WHO-MGRS standards.
  • Regional differences within India, both in the prevalence of stunting as well as increases in adult heights
    • It indicates that some States such as Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Tamil Nadu and Kerala are achieving much faster reductions than others.
    • Gene pools shift at the population level with greater socio-economic development
    • Demonstrated by the growing average heights of countries such as Japan
    • It refutes the immutability of genetic potential.

What are the issues India is facing currently?

  • Inappropriately high standards leading to a misdiagnosis of the situation
  • Resultant potential overfeeding of misclassified children under programmes of the government to address undernutrition
    • Resulting in an increase in overweight and obesity.
  • Increasing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in India.
  • Dietary gaps in children
  • Poor coverage of schemes such as mid-day meals and supplementary nutrition in anganwadis

 

Way Forward

  • The quality of the meals under the schemes must be improved to ensure that they are not cereal-heavy
    • Include all nutrients, and contribute to dietary diversity.
  • Recommendations such as including eggs in meals for children and pulses in the Public Distribution System must be acted upon urgently.
  • Along with improving diets, multiple interventions such as better sanitation, access to health care, childcare services and so on are required for better nutritional outcomes.
  • Using the appropriate standards is important for international comparisons and intra-country trends
    • An advantage that would be ok lost with any new country-specific standard.
  • Indian Council of Medical Research has constituted a committee to revise the growth references for India.
    • Committee has recommended a detailed rigorous study to be conducted across the country to examine child growth with the purpose of devising national growth charts, if necessary.
  • Acquiring newer, and more precise information on child growth is a welcome move
    • Considering our high aspirations of reaching development to every last person by 2047
    • It seems logical to stick to the aspirationally high but achievable standards suggested by the WHO-MGRS.

 

QUESTION FOR PRACTICE

Can the vicious cycle of gender inequality, poverty and malnutrition be broken through microfinancing of women SHGs? Explain with examples.(UPSC 2021) (200 WORDS, 10 MARKS)