A just energy transition for a low-carbon future

GS Paper 3

 Syllabus: Infrastructure (Energy)/Conservation, Environmental Pollution and Degradation

 

Source: TH

 Context: Given the significant impact that cities have on the environment, low-carbon cities are crucial to mitigate the effects of climate change.

 

How are cities impacting climate?

  • In 2020, cities across the world dumped 29 trillion tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere.
  • This CO2 along with other GHGs poses a serious health hazard and also manifests as extreme weather events, leading to the loss of lives and livelihoods.

 

Challenges ahead: By 2050, 7 billion people will be living in cities.

Need of the hour – A just energy-system transition:

  • This could reduce urban CO2 emissions by around 74%.
  • The transition must be implemented both on the demand and the supply sides.

 

Mitigation options on the supply side: Include phasing out fossil fuels and increasing the share of renewables in the energy mix, and using carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies.

 

On the demand side:

  • Using the Avoid, Shift, Improve framework – reducing and substituting the demand for fossil fuels with renewables.
  • Addressing residual emissions in the energy sector by implementing CO2 removal (CDR) technologies.

 

Why is a just energy transition needed?

  • A one-size-fits-all approach is unlikely to ensure a socially and environmentally just transition.
    • For example, transitioning to renewable energy sources could disproportionately affect communities and fossil fuels-dependent sectors in developing economies.
  • Other concerns include land dispossession related to large-scale renewable energy projects, spatial concentration of poverty, gendered impacts, etc.

 

Significance of Indian states to achieve energy transition goals:

  • States as spheres of implementation: The realisation of national goals often depends on how they are aligned with State priorities and capabilities.
  • States as laboratories of policy innovations: For example, PM KUSUM is a national adoption of successful State efforts on solarizing agriculture.
  • The legacy issues must be addressed at the State level: Such as high losses, unreliable supply and service quality in the electricity sector.

 

Good news: With rapid advancements in clean energy and related technologies and reduced cost, the economic and technological barriers to implementing low-carbon solutions have been crossed.

 

Way ahead:

  • Transitioning to low-carbon/net-zero cities: It is necessary to decarbonise urban systems.
  • Sector-coupling approach: Integrate mitigation and adaptation options in multiple sectors, including energy, buildings, transportation, industry, and urban land use.
  • A State-level framework: To understand plans, actions, and governance processes and to broaden the transition discourse.
  • Different strategies for different cities: The considerations are a city’s spatial form, land-use pattern, level of development, and the state of urbanisation.
    • The strategies include energy-efficient services and infrastructure, people-centric urban design, and implementing building codes while gradually shifting to low-emission construction materials.
  • For a just energy transition: The energy supply needs to be balanced against fast-growing energy demand (due to urbanisation), the need for energy security and exports.
  • Mitigation and adaptation responses: Must engage multiple stakeholders in energy governance and decision-making, scaling up investments and capabilities, etc.

 

Conclusion:

  • In the upcoming G20 forum, India is planning to propose a multiple energy pathways approach to accommodate the diverse development trajectories of countries.
  • The diversity of India’s States, which necessitates multiple pathways, will determine its own domestic energy transition.

 

Insta Links:

Low-cost finance for the energy transition report