Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Considering the alarming importance of CSAT in UPSC CSE Prelims exam and with enormous requests we received recently, InsightsIAS has started Daily CSAT Test to ensure students practice CSAT Questions on a daily basis. Regular Practice would help one overcome the fear of CSAT too.
We are naming this initiative as Insta– DART – Daily Aptitude and Reasoning Test. We hope you will be able to use DART to hit bull’s eye in CSAT paper and comfortably score 100+ even in the most difficult question paper that UPSC can give you in CSP-2021. Your peace of mind after every step of this exam is very important for us.
Looking forward to your enthusiastic participation (both in sending us questions and solving them on daily basis on this portal).
Wish you all the best ! 🙂
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
In each question below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is Strong argument and which is Weak Argument
STATEMENT: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?
Arguments: I. Yes, It is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.
II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.
Correct
SOLUTION: (b)
Clearly, restricts on the diet of people will be denying them their basic human right. So, only argument II holds.
Incorrect
SOLUTION: (b)
Clearly, restricts on the diet of people will be denying them their basic human right. So, only argument II holds.
-
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
In each question below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is Strong argument and which is Weak Argument
STATEMENT: Should India become a permanent member of UN security Council?
Arguments: I. Yes, India has emerged as a country which loves peace and amity.
II. No, let us solve problems of our own people like poverty, malnutrition.
Correct
SOLUTION: (a)
A peace- loving nation like India can well join an international forum which seeks to bring different nations on friendly terms with each other. So, argument I holds strong. Argument II highlights a different aspect. The internal problems of a nation should not debar it from strengthening international ties. So, argument II is vague.
Incorrect
SOLUTION: (a)
A peace- loving nation like India can well join an international forum which seeks to bring different nations on friendly terms with each other. So, argument I holds strong. Argument II highlights a different aspect. The internal problems of a nation should not debar it from strengthening international ties. So, argument II is vague.
-
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
In each question below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is Strong argument and which is Weak Argument
STATEMENT: Should the persons below the age of 18 years be allowed to join armed forces?
Arguments: I. No, Persons below the age 18 do not attain both physical and mental maturity to shoulder such burden.
II. Yes, This will help the country develop its armed forces which will serve the country for a longer time.
Correct
SOLUTION: (a)
The armed forces must consist of physically strong and mentally mature individuals to take care of defence properly. So, argument I holds strong. Clearly, argument II is vague.
Incorrect
SOLUTION: (a)
The armed forces must consist of physically strong and mentally mature individuals to take care of defence properly. So, argument I holds strong. Clearly, argument II is vague.
-
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
In each question below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is Strong argument and which is Weak Argument
STATEMENT: Should there be a ban on product advertising?
Arguments: I. No, it is an age of advertising. Unless your advertisement is better than your other competitors, the product will not be sold.
II. Yes, the money spent on advertising is very huge and it inflates the cost of the product.
Correct
SOLUTION: (c)
Clearly, it is the advertisement which makes the customer aware of the qualities of the product and leads him to buy it. So, argument I is valid. But at the same time, advertising nowadays has become a cost affair and expenses on it add to the price of the product. So, argument II also holds Strong.
Incorrect
SOLUTION: (c)
Clearly, it is the advertisement which makes the customer aware of the qualities of the product and leads him to buy it. So, argument I is valid. But at the same time, advertising nowadays has become a cost affair and expenses on it add to the price of the product. So, argument II also holds Strong.
-
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
In each question below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is Strong argument and which is Weak Argument
STATEMENT: Should those who receive dowry, despite the law prohibiting, be punished?
Arguments: I. Yes, those who violate the law, must be punished.
II. No, Dowry system is firmly rooted in the society since time immemorial.
Correct
SOLUTION: (a)
Clearly, laws are made to ensure that no person pursues the practice. So, persons who violate the laws need to be punished. Thus, argument I holds Strong. Dowry system is a wrong practice, no matter how firmly rooted, and needs to be ended. So, argument II is vague.
Incorrect
SOLUTION: (a)
Clearly, laws are made to ensure that no person pursues the practice. So, persons who violate the laws need to be punished. Thus, argument I holds Strong. Dowry system is a wrong practice, no matter how firmly rooted, and needs to be ended. So, argument II is vague.
