Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
Consider the following statements regarding Department-Related Standing Committees (DRSC).
- The Department-Related Standing Committees (DRSC) are reconstituted every year by both the Presiding Officers of Parliament in consultation with the respective parties and the government.
- The constitution has made it mandatory for the members to attend the committee meetings since it scrutinises key legislations.
- The committees of the Lok Sabha are more in number than Rajya Sabha.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: b)
Only 16 members of the Rajya Sabha attended all the scheduled 361 meetings held in 2020.
Eight committees of the Rajya Sabha and 16 of the Lok Sabha are recast every year by both the Presiding Officers of Parliament in consultation with the respective parties and the government. Each committee has 10 members from Rajya Sabha and 21 from Lok Sabha.
Incorrect
Solution: b)
Only 16 members of the Rajya Sabha attended all the scheduled 361 meetings held in 2020.
Eight committees of the Rajya Sabha and 16 of the Lok Sabha are recast every year by both the Presiding Officers of Parliament in consultation with the respective parties and the government. Each committee has 10 members from Rajya Sabha and 21 from Lok Sabha.
-
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
The Article 19(2) of the Constitution of India imposes restrictions on free speech under which of the following situations?
- Interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India
- For friendly relations with foreign states
- Preventing incitement to the commission of an offence
Select the correct answer code:
Correct
Solution: d)
Telegraph Act, 1885: Under this law, the government can intercept calls only in certain situations — the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states or public order, or for preventing incitement to the commission of an offence. These are the same restrictions imposed on free speech under Article 19(2) of the Constitution.
Incorrect
Solution: d)
Telegraph Act, 1885: Under this law, the government can intercept calls only in certain situations — the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states or public order, or for preventing incitement to the commission of an offence. These are the same restrictions imposed on free speech under Article 19(2) of the Constitution.
-
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Consider the following statements.
- According to the Constitution of India, the Governor shall from time to time summon the House or each House of the Legislature of the State to meet at such time and place as he thinks fit.
- The Governor always has to act on the aid and advice of the cabinet and cannot decide on his or her own on summoning the House.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: a)
“The Governor shall from time to time summon the House or each House of the Legislature of the State to meet at such time and place as he thinks fit…” says Article 174 of the Constitution. The provision also puts on the Governor the responsibility of ensuring that the House is summoned at least once every six months.
Although it is the Governor’s prerogative to summon the House, according to Article 163, the Governor is required to act on the “aid and advice” of the Cabinet. So when the Governor summons the House under Article 174, this is not of his or her own will but on the aid and advice of the Cabinet.
There are a few instances where the Governor can summon the House despite the refusal of the Chief Minister who heads the Cabinet. When the Chief Minister appears to have lost the majority and the legislative members of the House propose a no-confidence motion against the Chief Minister, then the Governor can decide on his or her own on summoning the House.
But the actions of the Governor, when using his discretionary powers can be challenged in court.
Incorrect
Solution: a)
“The Governor shall from time to time summon the House or each House of the Legislature of the State to meet at such time and place as he thinks fit…” says Article 174 of the Constitution. The provision also puts on the Governor the responsibility of ensuring that the House is summoned at least once every six months.
Although it is the Governor’s prerogative to summon the House, according to Article 163, the Governor is required to act on the “aid and advice” of the Cabinet. So when the Governor summons the House under Article 174, this is not of his or her own will but on the aid and advice of the Cabinet.
There are a few instances where the Governor can summon the House despite the refusal of the Chief Minister who heads the Cabinet. When the Chief Minister appears to have lost the majority and the legislative members of the House propose a no-confidence motion against the Chief Minister, then the Governor can decide on his or her own on summoning the House.
But the actions of the Governor, when using his discretionary powers can be challenged in court.
-
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Consider the following statements regarding Indian Citizenship Act, 1955.
- According to the Act, any Indian citizen who acquires foreign citizenship ceases to be an Indian citizen.
- The Act specifies the procedure required for termination of Indian citizenship in case of acquisition of foreign citizenship.
- Some of the provisions of the law does not apply when India is at war with any country.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: b)
India does not allow dual citizenship. According to Section 9 of the Indian Citizenship Act, 1955, any Indian citizen who acquires foreign citizenship ceases to be an Indian citizen.
“Any citizen of India who by naturalisation, registration, otherwise voluntarily acquires, or has at any time between the 26th January, 1950 and the commencement of this Act, voluntarily acquired the citizenship of another country shall, upon such acquisition or, as the case may be, such commencement, cease to be a citizen of India,” Section 9 says.
The only exception when this law does not apply is when the two concerned countries are at war with each other.
Neither the Act nor the Citizenship Rules of 2009 specify any procedure required for termination of citizenship in case of acquisition of foreign citizenship. Legal experts say the law is clear that Indian citizenship will cease to exist the moment one acquires foreign citizenship.
Incorrect
Solution: b)
India does not allow dual citizenship. According to Section 9 of the Indian Citizenship Act, 1955, any Indian citizen who acquires foreign citizenship ceases to be an Indian citizen.
“Any citizen of India who by naturalisation, registration, otherwise voluntarily acquires, or has at any time between the 26th January, 1950 and the commencement of this Act, voluntarily acquired the citizenship of another country shall, upon such acquisition or, as the case may be, such commencement, cease to be a citizen of India,” Section 9 says.
The only exception when this law does not apply is when the two concerned countries are at war with each other.
Neither the Act nor the Citizenship Rules of 2009 specify any procedure required for termination of citizenship in case of acquisition of foreign citizenship. Legal experts say the law is clear that Indian citizenship will cease to exist the moment one acquires foreign citizenship.
-
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
Consider the following statements regarding the Sessions of Parliament in India.
- India does have a fixed parliamentary calendar.
- The summoning of Parliament is based on the provisions of the Government of India Act, 1935.
- By convention, Parliament meets for three sessions in a year.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: c)
India does not have a fixed parliamentary calendar. By convention, Parliament meets for three sessions in a year.
The summoning of Parliament is specified in Article 85 of the Constitution. Like many other articles, it is based on a provision of The Government of India Act, 1935.
Incorrect
Solution: c)
India does not have a fixed parliamentary calendar. By convention, Parliament meets for three sessions in a year.
The summoning of Parliament is specified in Article 85 of the Constitution. Like many other articles, it is based on a provision of The Government of India Act, 1935.