EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The ‘India pole’ in international politics

 

Source: The Hindu

  • Prelims: Current events of international importance, G20, SCO, UNSC, NAM etc
  • Mains GS Paper II: Bilateral, regional and global grouping and agreements involving India or affecting India’s interests, Important international institutions agencies and fora etc

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

  • The ongoing war in Ukraine and the confrontation between Russia (India’s traditional partner) and the United States and the West (also India’s partners) on the other have increased the frequency/regularity of the question: which side India stands?

INSIGHTS ON THE ISSUE

Context

India First Policy:

  • With one-fifth of the world’s population, India has the right to have its own side and to weigh its own interests.
  • Realistic Diplomacy: India has a new voice in the global firmament, rooted in its domestic realities and civilizational ethos, as well as firm in the pursuit of its vital interests.
  • Indian Foreign Minister remarks at Raisina Dialogue:
    • It is better to engage with the world on the basis of “who we are” rather than try and please the world.
    • India is confident about its identity and priorities, the world will engage with India on its terms.

foreign

 

Moral Aspects of India’s Foreign Policy:

  • Panchsheel (Five Virtues):
    • Mutual respect for each other’s territorial integrity and sovereignty
    • Mutual non-aggression
    • Mutual non-interference
    • Equality and mutual benefit
    • Peaceful co-existence
  • Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (The World is One Family): It is based on the concept of Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas.

 

Reason for India not taking the sides:

  • Pole: It views itself as a pole in the international system, and not as a satellite state or a camp follower.
  • Interests: It views itself as a side whose interests are not accounted for by other camps or poles.

 

Why does India consider itself as a pole in the international system?

  • Character of the country’s long struggle for independence
  • The pre and post-Independence articulations of leaders such as Jawaharlal Nehru, Gandhiji, and Bal Gangadhar Tilak among others on international politics
  • Legatee(legacy)state: The primacy India inherited as the legatee state of the British empire in South Asia
  • Civilisational: India’s larger than life civilisational sense of self
  • Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) experiment: It contributed to India’s desire for a unique foreign policy identity and a voice in the comity of nations.

 

Evidence of India as pole since beginning:

  • NAM: pursuing non-alignment for several decades after Independence.

 

India’s stand:

  • South Asia: It has not actively sought to dominate the South Asian regional subsystem even when it could.
  • Balancing behavior: Its balancing behavior has been subpar
  • Alliances: India has refused to build alliances in the classical sense of the term.
  • Occasional balancing behavior: for instance, the 1971 India-Soviet Treaty during the Bangladesh war was contingent on emergencies.

 

Elements of India’s idea of being a pole:

  • Strategic periphery: India believes that it has a strategic periphery in South Asia where it has a natural claim to primacy.
  • Discourages interference by other powers in space.
  • Stand with underprivileged: India often tends to speak for ‘underprivileged collectives’, physical (South Asia) or otherwise (NAM, developing nations, global south, etc.
  • Rule of law: It welcomes the rule of law and regional order

 

Way Forward

  • NAM: India’s non-alignment is not neutrality, but the ability to take a position on a given issue on a case-by-case basis.
  • South Asia: India’s historical focus on the region has been more of a provider of common goods than as a rule setter or/of demand of allegiance.
  • India’s recent or past statements on issues of global importance: Ukraine or Iraq, NATO’s aerial campaign in Serbia, or bringing climate change to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC)
    • Taking positions not just suit its interests but are also informed by its sense of being a unique player on the global stage.
  • India is a pivotal power in the Indo-Pacific and beyond with an ability to help tackle security, climate and other challenges of global consequence.
  • India will chair the G20 and the SCO in 2022: It will further seek to assert itself as a major pole in the international system, and dissuade demands to follow one camp or another.

 

QUESTION FOR PRACTICE

Q. The long sustained image of India as a leader of the oppressed and marginalized nations has disappeared on account of its new found role in the emerging global order.’ Elaborate(UPSC 2019) (200 WORDS, 10 MARKS)