Topic: Case Study
7. You are appointed as an officer heading the section in Environment Pollution Control Board to ensure compliance and its follow – up. In that region, there were large number of small and medium industries which had been granted clearance. You learnt that these industries provide employment to many migrant workers. Most of the industrial units have got environmental clearance certificate in their possession. The environmental clearance seeks to curb industries and projects that supposedly hamper environment and living species in the region. But in practice, most of these units remain to be polluting units in several ways like air, water and soil pollution. As such, local people encountered persistent health problems.
It was confirmed that majority of the industries were violating environmental compliance. You issued notice to all the industrial units to apply for fresh environmental clearance certificate from the competent authority. However, your action met with hostile response from a section of the industrial units, other vested interest persons and a section of the local politicians. The workers also became very hostile to you as they felt that your action would lead to the closure of these industrial units, and the resultant unemployment will lead to insecurity and uncertainty in their livelihood. Many owners of the industries approached you with the plea that you should not initiate harsh action as it would compel them to close their units, and cause huge financial loss, shortage of their products in the market. These would obviously add to the sufferings of the labourers and the consumers alike. The labour union also sent you representation requesting against the closure of the units, You simultaneously started receiving threats from unknown corners. You however received supports from some of your colleagues, who advised you to act freely to ensure environmental compliance. Local NGOs also came to your support and they demanded the closure of the polluting units immediately.
(a) What are the options available to under the given situation?
(b) Critically examine the options listed by you.
(c) What type of mechanism would you suggest to ensure environmental compliance?
(d) What are the ethical dilemmas you faced in exercising your option? (250 Words) (20 M) (UPSC 2022)
Difficulty level: Moderate
Structure of the answer:
Start by giving the context. Bring out the key stakeholders in the above case study and major ethical issues present.
In the body, write about the rational course of action available for you as the officer in charge.
Next, give valid arguments for the both the above-mentioned courses of action that you can take. Evaluate its pros and cons in detail.
Next, write about the compliance you will take suggest justify that ethically.
Next, write about major ethical dilemmas you will face.
Conclude by stressing on the importance of rationality and courage in decision making.