Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
Consider the following statements regarding the status of Fundamental Rights vs Directive Principles of State policy.
- The Supreme Court in Golaknath Case, 1967 held that the Indian Constitution is founded on the bedrock of the balance between the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles.
- The Parliament can completely amend Directive Principles of State policy in order to improve the administration of any of the Fundamental Rights.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: d)
In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court also held that ‘the Indian Constitution is founded on the bedrock of the balance between the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles.
This harmony and balance between the two is an essential feature of the basic structure of the Constitution.
The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing the Directive Principles, so long as the amendment does not damage or destroy the basic structure of the Constitution.
However, the Parliament cannot amend the Directive principles on its whims and fancies and affect the ‘welfare state’ credential of Indian constitution since it forms a part of the basic structure.
Incorrect
Solution: d)
In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court also held that ‘the Indian Constitution is founded on the bedrock of the balance between the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles.
This harmony and balance between the two is an essential feature of the basic structure of the Constitution.
The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing the Directive Principles, so long as the amendment does not damage or destroy the basic structure of the Constitution.
However, the Parliament cannot amend the Directive principles on its whims and fancies and affect the ‘welfare state’ credential of Indian constitution since it forms a part of the basic structure.
-
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
Consider the following statements regarding Governor’s legislative powers.
- If a bill passed by the state legislature endangers the position of the state high court, the Governor shall reserve the bill for consideration of the President.
- If a bill sent by Governor for the reconsideration of the State legislature is passed again without amendments, the Governor is under no constitutional obligation to give his assent to the bill.
Which of the above statements is/are incorrect?
Correct
Solution: b)
Article 200 provides that when a Bill passed by the State Legislature, is presented to the Governor, the Governor shall declare—
(a) that he assents to the Bill; or
(b) that he withholds assent therefrom; or
(c) that he reserves the Bill for the President’s consideration; or
(d) the Governor may, as soon as possible, return the Bill (other than a Money Bill) with a message for re-consideration by the State Legislature. But, if the Bill is again passed by the Legislature with or without amendment, the Governor shall not withhold assent therefrom; or
(e) if in the opinion of the Governor, the Bill, if it became law, would so derogate from the powers of the High Court as to endanger its constitutional position, he shall not assent to but shall reserve it for the consideration of the President.
Incorrect
Solution: b)
Article 200 provides that when a Bill passed by the State Legislature, is presented to the Governor, the Governor shall declare—
(a) that he assents to the Bill; or
(b) that he withholds assent therefrom; or
(c) that he reserves the Bill for the President’s consideration; or
(d) the Governor may, as soon as possible, return the Bill (other than a Money Bill) with a message for re-consideration by the State Legislature. But, if the Bill is again passed by the Legislature with or without amendment, the Governor shall not withhold assent therefrom; or
(e) if in the opinion of the Governor, the Bill, if it became law, would so derogate from the powers of the High Court as to endanger its constitutional position, he shall not assent to but shall reserve it for the consideration of the President.
-
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Consider the following statements regarding the ‘sealed covers’ submitted by the government or its agencies to the Supreme Court during case hearing.
- The practice of submission of confidential material to the court in sealed covers is not backed by any law.
- The Government has the privilege of non-disclosure of some documents and communications on the ground of national security.
- The action taken report on any case cannot be submitted to the court in a sealed cover.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Correct
Solution: a)
In the Muzaffarpur shelter home sexual abuse case, the former Chief Justice N.V. Ramana wondered why even an ‘action taken’ report should be in a sealed envelope.
It is true that the law permits the submission of confidential material to the court in some cases. In addition, courts can order some contents to be kept confidential. The Evidence Act also allows the privilege of non-disclosure of some documents and communications.
Incorrect
Solution: a)
In the Muzaffarpur shelter home sexual abuse case, the former Chief Justice N.V. Ramana wondered why even an ‘action taken’ report should be in a sealed envelope.
It is true that the law permits the submission of confidential material to the court in some cases. In addition, courts can order some contents to be kept confidential. The Evidence Act also allows the privilege of non-disclosure of some documents and communications.
-
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Part XVII of the Constitution deals with the official language. Its provisions are divided into
- Official Language of the Union
- Regional languages
- Language of the judiciary and texts of laws
Select the correct answer code:
Correct
Solution: d)
Part XVII of the Constitution deals with the official language in Articles 343 to 351. Its provisions are divided into four heads—
- Language of the Union,
- Regional languages,
- Language of the judiciary and texts of laws and
- Special directives.
Incorrect
Solution: d)
Part XVII of the Constitution deals with the official language in Articles 343 to 351. Its provisions are divided into four heads—
- Language of the Union,
- Regional languages,
- Language of the judiciary and texts of laws and
- Special directives.
-
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
The Constitution of India lays down a functional separation of the organs of the State in which of the following manner?
- The President or the Governor shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office.
- The validity of proceedings in Parliament and the Legislatures cannot be called into question in any Court.
- Parliament cannot discuss the conduct of the judges except when the proceeding to remove a judge is being carried out.
Select the correct answer code:
Correct
Solution: d)
The Constitution of India lays down a functional separation of the organs of the State in the following manner:
- Article 50: State shall take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive. This is for the purpose of ensuring the independence of judiciary.
- Article 122 and 212: validity of proceedings in Parliament and the Legislatures cannot be called into question in any Court. This ensures the separation and immunity of the legislatures from judicial intervention on the allegation of procedural irregularity.
- Judicial conduct of a judge of the Supreme Court and the High Courts’ cannot be discussed in the Parliament and the State Legislature, according to Article 121 and 211 of the Constitution.
- Articles 53 and 154 respectively, provide that the executive power of the Union and the State shall be vested with the President and the Governor and they enjoy immunity from civil and criminal liability.
Article 361: the President or the Governor shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office.
Incorrect
Solution: d)
The Constitution of India lays down a functional separation of the organs of the State in the following manner:
- Article 50: State shall take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive. This is for the purpose of ensuring the independence of judiciary.
- Article 122 and 212: validity of proceedings in Parliament and the Legislatures cannot be called into question in any Court. This ensures the separation and immunity of the legislatures from judicial intervention on the allegation of procedural irregularity.
- Judicial conduct of a judge of the Supreme Court and the High Courts’ cannot be discussed in the Parliament and the State Legislature, according to Article 121 and 211 of the Constitution.
- Articles 53 and 154 respectively, provide that the executive power of the Union and the State shall be vested with the President and the Governor and they enjoy immunity from civil and criminal liability.
Article 361: the President or the Governor shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office.









