Challenging the Special Marriage Act, 1954

GS paper  2

Syllabus: Social empowerment, Government policies and interventions for the development of the social sector and issues arising out of it, special marriage Act etc

 

Directions: These are contentious provisions. Know a few but no need to remember all.

Source: The Hindu

 

Context: The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition challenging provisions of the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954 requiring couples to give a notice declaring their intent to marry 30 days before their marriage.

 

What does the petition seek?

      • Article 21: This provision in the act violates the right to privacy of the parties.
      • Article 14: The requirement violates the right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution since no other laws prescribe such a requirement.

 

What are the provisions that have been challenged?

      • Section 5 of the SMA: It requires couples getting married under it to give notice to the Marriage Officer 30 days before the date of marriage.
      • Section 6: It requires notice to be entered into the Marriage Notice Book maintained by the Marriage Officer, which can be inspected by “any person desirous of inspecting the same.
      • Section 7: It provides the process for making an objection such as if either party has a living spouse, is incapable of giving consent due to “unsoundness of mind” or is suffering from a mental disorder resulting in the person being unfit for marriage or procreation.
      • Section 8:It Specifies the inquiry procedure to be followed after an objection has been submitted.

 

What did the Court say:

      • SC rejected the writ petition on the grounds that the petitioner(35- year-old Athira Sujatha) was no longer an aggrieved party as she had already solemnized her marriage under SMA.

 

Rules and laws in different states:

      • Haryana: The Haryana government has laid down 16 prerequisites which ask couples to issue a notice in a newspaper and that such notices be sent to their parents.
      • No-objection certificate: In certain States, couples have to seek a no-objection certificate from their parents.
      • Maharashtra: The Maharashtra Department of Registration and Stamps publicly shares the details of couples marrying under SMA on its website.
      • Love Jihad law: 11 States passed anti-conversion laws.example: Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh etc

 

 

How do these provisions make couples vulnerable?

      • Harassment by anti-social elements: Public notices have been used by anti-social elements to harass couples getting married.
      • Officers’ incompetence: There have been instances, where marriage officers have gone over and beyond the law and sent such notices to the parents of the couple.
        • Example: Muslim woman in Delhi being confined to her house by her parents in March 2020.

 

Special Marriage Act:

      • The SMA is a law which allows the solemnization of marriages without going through any religious customs or rituals.
      • People from different castes or religions or states get married under SMA in which marriage is solemnized by way of registration.

 

Insta Links:

Special Marriage Act 1954

 

Mains Links:

Q. Critically analyze the provisions of the special marriage Act 1954.

 

Prelims Links:

  • Special Marriage Act
  • Article 14 and 21

With reference to the Special Marriage Act, consider the following statements:

      1. It allows the solemnization of marriages without going through any religious customs or rituals.
      2. The prime purpose of the act was to address inter-religious marriages.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

a. 1 only

b. 2 only

c. Both 1 and 2

d. Neither 1 nor 2

Ans: (c)

Justification:

Refer to article