Topic: Security challenges and their management in border areas – linkages of organized crime with terrorism.
5. The Salwa Judum judgment was delivered 10 years ago, but it has not been effectively implemented by the government. Critically analyse in what way the tribals are still facing many hardships owing to human rights violation by the security forces. (250 words)
Reference: The Hindu
Why the question:
The article brings to us deeper insights from Chhattisgarh in the context of the Salwa Judum judgment.
Key Demand of the question:
Critically analyse in what way the tribals are still facing many hardships owing to human rights violation by the security forces.
Directive:
Critically analyze – When asked to analyse, you have to examine methodically the structure or nature of the topic by separating it into component parts and present them as a whole in a summary. When ‘critically’ is suffixed or prefixed to a directive, one needs to look at the good and bad of the topic and give a fair judgment.
Structure of the answer:
Introduction:
Start with brief background of the question.
Body:
The Supreme Court (SC) delivered a historic judgment on 5th July 2011 in Nandini Sundar and others versus the State of Chhattisgarh case.
The judgment was aimed to curb the misuse of power by the government and protect tribal rights.
Explain that the Salwa Judum judgment was delivered 10 years ago, but it has not been effectively implemented by the government. The tribals are still facing many hardships and there has been no prosecution of security forces for human rights violations.
Discuss the details of the judgment and its impact.
Discuss the impact of it on the tribal pockets, give the case study of Chhattisgarh.
Conclusion:
Conclude with suggestions.
