Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Insights into Editorial: Rebuild cities as spaces of dignity

smart_city

 

Context:

The COVID-19 pandemic has unravelled deep inequalities in how basic services are accessed in urban India.

Preventive methods in combating the infection, at an individual level, have highlighted these disparities even more sharply.

Availability of Basic Services is very limited to some sections:

  1. In the case of access to water, the recent “Drinking Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing Condition” (2018) survey by the government found that there continue to be glaring gaps in water access in urban and rural India.
  2. Consider, for example, the limited access to water. Washing hands for a minimum of 20 seconds is a fundamental in avoiding the infection.
  3. However, for migrant labourers without proper dwelling units, this “home-based” precaution is a limiting exercise because of inequitable access to water.
  4. The largely informal nature of contract employment under which migrant labourers work exacerbated the crisis during the various phases of the national lockdown.
  5. With basic amenities lacking and means of livelihood shrinking, migrant labourers were forced to exit from cities. Thousands of them walked on foot to their villages some as far as 500 kilometres away at times, with tragic consequences.
  6. The institutional failings to provide access to basic infrastructure can be seen more clearly in hindsight.
  7. However, even this survey does not count migrant workers. For example, “floating populations” a term used to categorise “persons without any normal residence” in the respective state, such as migrant workers are not considered in the sample data.

Huge Gap in Data About Migrants:

  1. Though the Unorganised Workers Social Security Act 2008 laid down the process of registration it specified the role of urban local bodies in cities to register migrants and disseminate information regarding schemes and benefits and asked these bodies to disburse “smart cards” for identification it is apparent that these measures were not obligatory.
  2. This was evident from the gap in the data provided by the union labour ministry and various state governments, in the wake of the pandemic, to the Supreme Court on the number of migrants.
  3. Offline and online modes have equally failed in gathering this data. Surveys assess access mostly at a household level to provide more “reliable” estimates.
  4. The 2018 survey, for example, said that in-house piped water supply is the most used form of access in urban India, thereby ignoring how thousands of people get their water supply.
  5. It offered no clues as to how migrants accessed water. There seems to be three possible options on how migrants may have got their water supply.
  6. First, migrant labourers are likely to have relied more on public amenities such as hand pumps and public taps or standpipes which are connected to a municipal connection.
  7. These sources are generally unreliable hand pumps and municipal pipes, for example, do not always supply water of potable quality.
  8. Second, contractors employing migrant workers may provide them with water access. However, this is purely a voluntary practise.
  9. Urban water boards do have a role in providing water to migrants. However, their responsibility towards providing a minimum per capita daily amount is, by and large, geared towards people who are connected to piped water supplies.

The problem is even deeper. There is a huge gap in data about migrants.

We do not know how many migrants enter and leave our states and cities.

New Framework of Comprehensive policy is the need of the hour:

  1. The post pandemic world calls for a new framework of access. As long as migrants remain “invisible” to the state, they will be subject to work in an unsafe work environment. In our current context, this is an impending disaster.
  2. Recognition and identification of migrants is the first step towards a more enhanced framework to provide basic amenities. To begin with, an effort to create a database of migrant workers is most necessary.
  3. To begin with, a record of migrant workers entering and leaving every city and state is an elementary requirement.
  4. This could be a game-changer by creating a digital Pan-India database to ensure coordination with their home districts and respective states.
  5. Eventually, convergence around this could create a framework of health, banking, microfinance and insurance networks centred around workers and migrants in urban areas.
  6. Risky work conditions could lead to the resurgence of the virus, unless labourers can take adequate safety precautions at their workplace.

 Conclusion:

The crisis presents an opportunity to re-examine how our cities are developed on the backs of migrant labour.

Along with the responsibility of the state, businesses and contractors employing labourers can be involved in providing access to basic services.

The deployment of such measures could be made a requirement for building permits and clearances violations could attract penalties.

The Unorganised Workers Social Security Act hardly puts any responsibility on the contractors and businesses to provide any services.

It came as no surprise when most of them neglected the migrant workers during the crisis.

A greater role for businesses is not being idealistic. Rather, such roles are recognised as crucial by the International Labour Organisation.

Such measures give central importance to the dignity of labour, they also affirm the dignity of an individual “before” their labour.

It may go a long way in building our cities as spaces where access to basic services by the poor is rooted in a language of dignity and rights, not charity and voluntarism.


Insights Current Affairs Analysis (ICAN) by IAS Topper

 


  • Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates
  • Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE to watch Motivational and New analysis videos