Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Insights into Editorial: Guaranteeing healthcare, the Brazilian way

Insights into Editorial: Guaranteeing healthcare, the Brazilian way

Healthcare_in_Brazil

 

Context:

As Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro visits New Delhi this Republic Day, one interesting field of cooperation to explore in the strategic partnership is healthcare.

Both Brazil and India are composed of large States with a reasonable degree of administrative autonomy. This fact implies great challenges and opportunities.

While universal health systems tend to consume around 8% of the GDP — the NHS, for instance, takes up 7.9% of Britain’s GDP, Brazil spends only 3.8% of its GDP on the Unified Health System (SUS), serving a population three times larger than that of the U.K.

Universal Health Coverage for India:

Achieving universal health coverage is a very complex task, especially for developing countries.

Here, the example of Brazil, the only country where more than 100 million inhabitants have a universal health system, is worth studying.

It can also provide lessons for Ayushman Bharat, currently the world’s largest and most ambitious government health programme.

Unified Health System (SUS) of Brazil:

  • The Brazilian society decided to achieve universal coverage by establishing a government-funded system.
  • The Unified Health System (SUS), which guaranteed free health coverage that included pharmaceutical services, was written into the new Constitution in 1988.
  • In the last 30 years, Brazilians have experienced a drastic increase in health coverage as well as outcomes: life expectancy has increased from 64 years to almost 76 years, while Infant Mortality Rate has declined from 53 to 14 per 1,000 live births.
  • In terms of service provision, polio vaccination has reached 98% of the population.
  • National Health Identification Card: It allows a patient’s health record to be accessed via a central database from any public or private hospital within the Unified Health System network.
  • Family Health Programme: Community-based healthcare network who perform monthly visits to every family enrolled in the programme. They conduct health promotion and prevention activities and effectively manage the relationship between citizens and the healthcare system
  • A 2015 report said that 95% of those that seek care in the SUS are able to receive treatment.
  • Every year, the SUS covers more than two million births, 10 million hospital admissions, and nearly one billion ambulatory procedures.
  • This has been made possible even amidst a scenario of tightening budget allocation.

Establishing wellness centres: Community-based healthcare:

  • The Brazilian experience can also inform the design of the expansion of primary care that underlies Ayushman Bharat, that is, the creation of 1,50,000 wellness centre by 2022.
  • The Family Health Programme, which relies on a community-based healthcare network, is the backbone of the rapid expansion of coverage in Brazil.
  • The strategy is based on an extensive work of community health agents who perform monthly visits to every family enrolled in the programme.
  • These agents carry out a variety of tasks. They conduct health promotion and prevention activities, oversee whether family members are complying with any treatment they might be receiving, and effectively manage the relationship between citizens and the healthcare system.
  • The strategy works: a large body of research shows that the programme has drastically reduced IMR and increased adult labour supply.
  • Equally impressive has been its expansion, from 4% of coverage in 2000 to up to 64% of the overall population in 2015; it was able to reach even the rural areas and the poorest States of the country.
  • The major challenge is that a one-size-fits-all approach for such heterogeneous regional realities is inconceivable.
  • States such as Tamil Nadu, Sikkim, and Bihar differ in so many ways and this diversity must be met by an intricate combination of standardised programmes and autonomy to adopt policies according to their characteristics.

Example for India by Healthcare system in Brazil:

India must record details of improvement in terms of access, production and population health on a year-by-year basis.

A starting point for this daunting task is funding. Public health expenditure is still very low in India, at around 1.3% of GDP in the 2017-2018 fiscal year.

A study conducted by the Brazil-based Institute for Health Policy Studies (IEPS) forecasts that public health spending in Brazil will need to increase by nearly 1.6 percentage points of the GDP by 2060 in order to cover the healthcare needs of a fast-ageing society.

National Health Identification Card scheme can be integrated by making use of Aadhar ecosystem so as to create a better system of coordination between public and private sector healthcare institutions regulated by the Health Agency.

The cost of the universal health system in Brazil averages around $600 per person, while in the U.K., this number reaches $3.428.

A partnership for health between the government or an institution and the community is based on the commitment of both actors to actively collaborate to support the quality of health services or to make public health programmes more effective.

This formal or informal collaboration can only be established if political leaders and administrators take on a specific commitment to social development and if the society is ready to assume its responsibility.

Conclusion:

Achieving universal coverage in India, a country with a population of 1.3 billion, is a challenge of epic proportions.

Hence, the advances in this field should be seen not in binaries but judged by its steady growth and improvement.

The health system is responsible for ensuring high-quality accessible health services, for providing clear information and advice on the benefits of health to the community and for facilitating its early involvement in assessing the situation, defining the problem and managing the action.

Moreover, regional disparities in terms of resources and institutional capabilities must be addressed. This diversity, nevertheless, can be a powerful source of policy innovation and creativity.