QUIZ – 2017: Insights Current Affairs Quiz, 06 April 2018
QUIZ – 2017: Insights Current Affairs Quiz
The following quiz will have 5-10 MCQs . The questions are mainly framed from The Hindu and PIB news articles.
This quiz is intended to introduce you to concepts and certain important facts relevant to UPSC IAS civil services preliminary exam 2018. It is not a test of your knowledge. If you score less, please do not mind. Read again sources provided and try to remember better.
Please try to enjoy questions, discuss the concepts and facts they try to test from you and suggest improvements.
Hope you enjoy this quiz. If you like it, then please share it. Thank you.
INSIGHTS CURRENT EVENTS QUIZ 2017
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
The following Quiz is based on the Hindu, PIB and other news sources. It is a current events based quiz. Solving these questions will help retain both concepts and facts relevant to UPSC IAS civil services exam.
To view Solutions, follow these instructions:
-
Click on – ‘Start Quiz’ button
-
Solve Questions
-
Click on ‘Quiz Summary’ button
-
Click on ‘Finish Quiz’ button
-
Now click on ‘View Questions’ button – here you will see solutions and links.
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
| Average score |
|
| Your score |
|
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
| Pos. | Name | Entered on | Points | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Table is loading | ||||
| No data available | ||||
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
1 points‘Forests’, under the Seventh Schedule, is on the
Correct
Solution: c.
Prevention of cruelty to animals, Forests and Protection of wild animals and birds are subjects in the concurrent list.
Seventh Schedule: https://www.mea.gov.in/Images/pdf1/S7.pdf;
Improvisation: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/anti-forest-anti-forest-dweller/article23437396.ece;
Incorrect
Solution: c.
Prevention of cruelty to animals, Forests and Protection of wild animals and birds are subjects in the concurrent list.
Seventh Schedule: https://www.mea.gov.in/Images/pdf1/S7.pdf;
Improvisation: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/anti-forest-anti-forest-dweller/article23437396.ece;
-
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
1 pointsConsider the following pairs:
Provision in Representation of the People Act, 1951 – Description
- 29A – Registration with the Election Commission of associations and bodies as political parties
- 29C – Mandatory reporting to the EC of funds accrued to a party by way of electoral bonds
- 33(7) – Allowing candidates to contest from two constituencies at a time
Which of the descriptions given above correctly relate to the sections of the Act?
Correct
Solution: c.
- TH: The apex court had, on March 26, asked how convicted persons, who are barred from electoral politics, could decide on candidates for polls and ensure the maintenance of probity in public life. The apex court had posted the matter to May 3 for final disposal.. The top court had, on December 1 last year, sought the response of the Centre and the EC on the PIL and agreed to examine the constitutional validity of section 29A, RPA, which deals with the power of the poll panel to register a political party.
- Livemint: In May last year, the election commission had told a parliamentary committee that electoral bonds introduced by the government is a “retrograde” step.. The commission, in a written submission to the parliamentary standing committee on law and personnel, had said changes made in the election laws after the introduction of the bonds would compromise transparency in political funding.. “The amendment in section 29 C of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 making it no longer necessary to report details of donations received through electoral bonds is a retrograde step as transparency of political funding would be compromised as a result of the change,” it had said.
- TH: A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra was hearing a petition filed by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay seeking a declaration striking down Section 33(7) of the Representation of the People Act of 1951, which allows candidates to contest from two constituencies at a time, as invalid and unconstitutional. The EC informed the court that it had proposed the amendment of Section 33(7) way back in July 2004. It was one of the 22 “urgent electoral reforms” the EC had suggested to a Rajya Sabha Parliamentary Standing Committee. It had pointed out that there had been cases of a person contesting from two constituencies and winning from both. “The consequence is that a by-election would be required from one constituency, involving avoidable labour and expenditure…”
—
Incorrect
Solution: c.
- TH: The apex court had, on March 26, asked how convicted persons, who are barred from electoral politics, could decide on candidates for polls and ensure the maintenance of probity in public life. The apex court had posted the matter to May 3 for final disposal.. The top court had, on December 1 last year, sought the response of the Centre and the EC on the PIL and agreed to examine the constitutional validity of section 29A, RPA, which deals with the power of the poll panel to register a political party.
- Livemint: In May last year, the election commission had told a parliamentary committee that electoral bonds introduced by the government is a “retrograde” step.. The commission, in a written submission to the parliamentary standing committee on law and personnel, had said changes made in the election laws after the introduction of the bonds would compromise transparency in political funding.. “The amendment in section 29 C of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 making it no longer necessary to report details of donations received through electoral bonds is a retrograde step as transparency of political funding would be compromised as a result of the change,” it had said.
- TH: A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra was hearing a petition filed by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay seeking a declaration striking down Section 33(7) of the Representation of the People Act of 1951, which allows candidates to contest from two constituencies at a time, as invalid and unconstitutional. The EC informed the court that it had proposed the amendment of Section 33(7) way back in July 2004. It was one of the 22 “urgent electoral reforms” the EC had suggested to a Rajya Sabha Parliamentary Standing Committee. It had pointed out that there had been cases of a person contesting from two constituencies and winning from both. “The consequence is that a by-election would be required from one constituency, involving avoidable labour and expenditure…”
—
-
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
1 pointsThe ‘2018 Internal Security Threat Report’ was published by
Correct
Solution: a.
- India emerged as the third most vulnerable country in terms of risk of cyber threats, such as malware, spam and ransomware, in 2017, moving up one place over previous year, according to a report by security solutions provider Symantec.
- In 2017, 5.09% of global threats detected were in India, slightly less than 5.11% in 2016. The U.S. (26.61%) was most vulnerable to such attacks, followed by China (10.95%), according to ‘Internet Security Threat Report’.
- The global threat ranking is based on eight metrics — malware, spam, phishing, bots, network attacks, web attacks, ransomware and cryptominers.
Incorrect
Solution: a.
- India emerged as the third most vulnerable country in terms of risk of cyber threats, such as malware, spam and ransomware, in 2017, moving up one place over previous year, according to a report by security solutions provider Symantec.
- In 2017, 5.09% of global threats detected were in India, slightly less than 5.11% in 2016. The U.S. (26.61%) was most vulnerable to such attacks, followed by China (10.95%), according to ‘Internet Security Threat Report’.
- The global threat ranking is based on eight metrics — malware, spam, phishing, bots, network attacks, web attacks, ransomware and cryptominers.
-
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
1 points‘Cryptojacking’, increasingly appearing in the news, refers to
Correct
Solution: b.
Widely publicized hacks such as the WannaCry worm, which affected systems on several continents in May 2017, encrypted victims’ files and demanded cryptocurrency ransoms – bitcoin, in the case of WannaCry – in order to decrypt them.
Cryptojacking takes a different approach, harnessing victims’ machines to “mine”: perform the computations necessary to update cryptocurrencies’ blockchains, creating new tokens and generating fees in the process. These new tokens and fees are deposited to wallets owned by the attacker, while the costs of mining – electricity and wear and tear to computers – are borne by the victim.
In the news: “The (Internal Security Threat) report also pointed out that with the threat landscape becoming more diverse, attackers are working harder to discover new avenues of attack and cover their tracks while doing so. “From the sudden spread of WannaCry and Petya/NotPetya, to the swift growth in coinminers, 2017 provided us with another reminder that digital security threats can come from new and unexpected sources,” it said. Cyber criminals, it said, are rapidly adding “cryptojacking” to their arsenal as the ransomware market becomes overpriced and overcrowded. “Cryptojacking is a rising threat to cyber and personal security… The massive profit incentive puts people, devices and organisations at risk of unauthorised coinminers siphoning resources from their systems, further motivating criminals to infiltrate everything from home PCs to giant data centers.”
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cryptojacking.asp;
—
Incorrect
Solution: b.
Widely publicized hacks such as the WannaCry worm, which affected systems on several continents in May 2017, encrypted victims’ files and demanded cryptocurrency ransoms – bitcoin, in the case of WannaCry – in order to decrypt them.
Cryptojacking takes a different approach, harnessing victims’ machines to “mine”: perform the computations necessary to update cryptocurrencies’ blockchains, creating new tokens and generating fees in the process. These new tokens and fees are deposited to wallets owned by the attacker, while the costs of mining – electricity and wear and tear to computers – are borne by the victim.
In the news: “The (Internal Security Threat) report also pointed out that with the threat landscape becoming more diverse, attackers are working harder to discover new avenues of attack and cover their tracks while doing so. “From the sudden spread of WannaCry and Petya/NotPetya, to the swift growth in coinminers, 2017 provided us with another reminder that digital security threats can come from new and unexpected sources,” it said. Cyber criminals, it said, are rapidly adding “cryptojacking” to their arsenal as the ransomware market becomes overpriced and overcrowded. “Cryptojacking is a rising threat to cyber and personal security… The massive profit incentive puts people, devices and organisations at risk of unauthorised coinminers siphoning resources from their systems, further motivating criminals to infiltrate everything from home PCs to giant data centers.”
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cryptojacking.asp;
—
-
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
1 pointsUltimately, ensuring that order is brought to the Lower House in order for it to function effectively is the responsibility of
Correct
Solution: a.
“Given the membership of the Lok Sabha, it is evident that this government enjoys a comfortable majority. That said, this position still needs to be tested if questioned. Parliamentary democracy works because there is a broadly held belief in the fair and just exercise of power by the state. The inability of Parliament to function and to test the support for the government undermines the very basis of our democratic structure. The Speaker has the responsibility of ensuring that the House functions and taking whatever steps are necessary — including suspension of members, if needed – to ensure order and check whether there is requisite support to admit the debate on the no-confidence motion.”
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/confidence-in-the-house/article23437310.ece;
—
Incorrect
Solution: a.
“Given the membership of the Lok Sabha, it is evident that this government enjoys a comfortable majority. That said, this position still needs to be tested if questioned. Parliamentary democracy works because there is a broadly held belief in the fair and just exercise of power by the state. The inability of Parliament to function and to test the support for the government undermines the very basis of our democratic structure. The Speaker has the responsibility of ensuring that the House functions and taking whatever steps are necessary — including suspension of members, if needed – to ensure order and check whether there is requisite support to admit the debate on the no-confidence motion.”
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/confidence-in-the-house/article23437310.ece;
—








